Showing posts with label Apple. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Apple. Show all posts

Sunday, August 25, 2013

Besieged by EMF Pollution and Weaponized Frequencies



What do we know about the possible ill health effects from exposure to the transmitting antennas for our wireless communications? If you rely on the mainstream media, next to nothing. Electromagnetic (EMF) pollution (especially by microwaves) is hardly ever discussed. It's often asserted that there are not enough studies to reliably assess high frequency EMF pollution but that's simply not true. The truth is that by 1990, there were more than 10,000 publications on the danger of EMF/RFR, and today, there are probably twice that many. It's just that the telecommunications industry doesn't want to risk trillions of dollars in profit, thus the negative effects of EMF pollution are still denied by official science. Keep in mind, the cell phone industry has funded 87% of the research on this subject.

It may be possible – and tempting – to exploit for strategic political purpose the fruits of research on the brain and on human behaviour. Gordon J.F. MacDonald, a geophysicist specialising in problems of warfare, has written that artificially excited electronic strokes ‘could lead to a pattern of oscillations that produce relatively high power levels over certain regions of the earth…In this way, one could develop a system that would seriously impair the brain performance of very large populations in selected regions over an extended period.’

No matter how deeply disturbing the thought of using the environment to manipulate behaviour for national advantages to some, the technology permitting such use will very probably develop within the next few decades.” -- Zbigniew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era:

Moreover, the military knew the effects of  EMFs as far back as the 1970s, after compiling 2300 studies to show the effects of microwaves on humans.

These antennas are found on all wireless communications devices, such as cell towers, WiMax systems, internet routers, cell and cordless phones, smart meters, smart boards, ebook readers not to mention, baby monitors. You can find out how many antennas and towers are located within a 4-mile radius of your address at Antennasearch.
Antennas are the actual signal emitters for cellular, paging and other radio services. Antennas can be placed on towers or be stand alone and placed on top of offices, condos, churches, light poles, signs, etc. Stand alone Antennas are small and difficult to spot as they are easily hidden/camouflaged.

Towers are tall structures (typically over 200 ft) used for Cellular, Paging and other radios services. Towers can contain multiple antennas owned by various companies.
World-renowned neurosurgeon and research scientist Dr. Lief Salford's  (Lund University, Sweden)  research findings--since 1988-- show blood brain barrier leakage in thousands of rat brains exposed to much lower doses of microwave radiation than cell phone usage, leading to increased albumin (neurotoxin) uptake, memory loss and damage of up to 2% of brain cells. Dr. Salford said that today, "two-thirds of the world's population volunteer as guinea pigs in the world's largest biological experiment."



Is Wifi making your kid sick?



Then, if the smart meters, cell towers, etc aren't bad enough, our domestic law enforcement is being encouraged to use "non-lethal" directed energy weapons on us. In order to avoid violation of international defense/agency treaties, the Department of Defense uses the Department of Justice to test "non-lethal" weapons classified as "crowd control", in their "non-lethal" electromagnetic weapons program. In 1993, the National Institute of Justice Initiative on Less than Lethal Weapons recommended that local and state police departments in America utilize psychotronic, electromagnetic, and other mind control weapons against American citizens involved in "domestic disturbances," an open-ended term that can include pretty much anything. The Washington Post reported, “The Pentagon and the DOJ have agreed to share state-of-the-art military technology with civilian law enforcement agencies, including exotic non-lethal weapons."
Short term research will be completed to adopt military technology to use by domestic law enforcement including laser microwave and electromagnetic weapons."

History teaches us that waiting for legislation and officials to protect our health is like closing the barn door after the horses escape. History teaches us that public health almost always loses to powerful commercial interests. Now that we have the information at our fingertips, there is no excuse for ignorance.

Links:

Apple IPAD 3G has Five Antennas

BioInitiative 2012

Is Wifi Safe For Children? Beware of Health Risks.

Cellular Telephone Russian Roulette by Robert Kane,a former top Motorola engineer, traces the history of cell phone development (in which he was involved) and analyzes the cell phone radiation bioeffects research base from 1950 to 1996.
Talking on a cellular phone can be likened to holding a microwave oven to one's head."
Cellular Radiation: Is This Our Next Titanic?

StopTheCrime.net

SmartMetersMurder.com

Read more...

Thursday, October 06, 2011

Is Apple’s 1987's Extraordinarily Accurate Prediction a Coincidence?

Is there such thing as coincidence? Of course...to a point. However, even though we've been conditioned to believe everything is coincidence, pure coincidence is a rare occurrence.

Take technology, for instance. There is no doubt that technology's 20-30 years - or more - ahead of what we're told. Think about it. If you discovered something that gave you an advantage over everyone else, would you share it immediately? No, not if you were interested in retaining power. And unless you live in fantasy land, you know the wealthy and powerful want to stay wealthy and powerful. In fact, there is no doubt that they're not satisfied with the power they have...they want more. Hence, they wait to release technology until they discover something that gives them a much bigger advantage.

Two days ago, people eagerly awaited the announcement of iPhone 5. Instead, to the disappointment of many, including the stock market, which plummeted, along with the changing of the guard, Apple released iPhone 4s. Sadly, the next day, Steve Jobs died. 

Just hours before the death of Steve Jobs, it was released that Apple predicted the release of iPhone 4s in 1987, 24-years, prior.  Below, you can see the video from 1987 which demonstrates   Knowledge Navigator, almost exactly the same as Siri, the new language-based voice assistant, which enables one to converse with other iPhone users. It was the apple of Apple's eye decades before yesterday's announcement.

 The similarities are incredible. The agent lists messages and appointments which the user replies to and rearranges by speaking in normal english. He then searches for information, extracts graphs from a large data store (just as Siri will connect to Wolfram Alpha) and contacts a colleague by saying her name aloud.
The prediction was accurate, almost to the day.  Now, Apple is known for their long incubation periods; however, 24-years is a very long incubation period. One has to wonder, in this day and age of exponential technology growth, why areas such as the cancer, and aeronautical industries haven't experienced any real breakthroughs of note, as compared to the telecommunications and computer industry.

Read more...

Saturday, June 04, 2011

In China, Selling Your Organs for Cash or an Ipad 2 is a Mouse Click Away

The illegal organ trade is widespread in China. It's made easier by a lack of proper regulations and hospital loopholes.

1.5 million Chinese require organ transplants, however, only 10,000 receive them each year. 65% of the organs come from executed prisoners. But new government regulations have reduced the number of organs available for transplant, and few Chinese agree to donate their organs upon death, widening the gap between supply and demand.

A 17-year-old student in Anhui Province sold one of his kidneys for 20,000 yuan only to buy an iPad 2. Now, with his health getting worse, the boy is feeling regret but it is too late, the Global Times reported today.


"I wanted to buy an iPad 2 but could not afford it," said the boy surnamed Zheng in Huaishan City. "A broker contacted me on the Internet and said he could help me sell one kidney for 20,000 yuan."

On April 28 Zheng went to Chenzhou City in neighboring Hunan Province for the kidney removal surgery arranged by the broker. His parents knew nothing about it, Zheng said. He was paid 22,000 yuan after his right kidney was taken out at the Chenzhou No. 198 Hospital.

When he returned home, his mother found out and reported to the police immediately. But they could not locate the broker whose cell phone was always powered off, the report said.

It turned out that the Chenzhou No. 198 Hospital was not qualified to perform organ transplant. The hospital claimed they had no idea about Zheng's surgery because the department that did the surgery had been contracted to a Fujian businessman.

The case is still under investigation, the report said.

Links:

The Red Market On the Trail of the World's Organ Brokers, Bone Thieves, Blood Farmers, and Child Traffickers

Regarding other black markets, the author of the book, Scott Carney, said:
I actually don't go into Kosovo at all in the book. It's a shame because what happened there during the war is horrible. In fact, I found during my research that there were far too many ways that the body is sold illegally for me to ever possibly cover. There are huge gaps where I don't explore organ rings in south america, the bone thefts of Biological Tissue Services in New Jersey, the NY Rabbi caught in a kidney ring, plastinated cadavers in South Shore Seaport. The list is extensive. Instead I have tried my best to look at ten or twelve distinct markets and look a similarities that might provide a lens to examine all red markets.

Read more...

Monday, March 31, 2008

Not All Brands Are Created Equal


Apple, Google, Microsoft, Coca-Cola, McDonald's and Starbucks seem to dominate the results from Interbrand's Brand channel 2008 Brandjunkie Survey:

What brand would you most like to sit next to at a dinner party?
Top answers:

  1. Apple
  2. Virgin
  3. Google
  4. Coca-Cola
  5. Nike
  1. Chanel
  2. Victoria's Secret
  3. Microsoft
  4. Nokia
  5. Absolut
  1. ARMANI
  2. Diesel
  3. innocent
  4. BMW
  5. adidas
  1. Disney
  2. PRADA
  3. Starbucks
  4. None
  5. Louis Vuitton

What brand, if sent back 100 years would have the biggest impact on the course of history?
Top answers:
  1. Apple
  2. Microsoft
  3. Google
  4. Coca-Cola
  5. Ford
  1. IBM
  2. McDonald's
  3. Virgin
  4. Nokia
  5. Nike
  1. None
  2. Sony
  3. Greenpeace
  4. Toyota
  5. Durex
  1. Boeing
  2. Intel
  3. USA
  4. GE
  5. Starbucks

What brand that no longer exists would you resurrect?
Top answers:
  1. None
  2. Pan Am
  3. ATARI
  4. TWA
  5. Cingular
  1. Oldsmobile
  2. Marathon
  3. Compaq
  4. IBM
  5. MG
  1. Polaroid
  2. Baniff
  3. Eaton's
  4. Studebaker
  5. Netscape
  1. Ansett
  2. Fresca
  3. Amena
  4. Plymouth
  5. TAB

Which brand do you want to argue with?
Top answers:
  1. Microsoft
  2. Apple
  3. None
  4. Coca-Cola
  5. McDonald's
  1. Wal-Mart
  2. Starbucks
  3. Nike
  4. Sony
  5. Google
  1. General Motors
  2. Dell
  3. Pepsi
  4. AT&T
  5. BP
  1. USA
  2. Ford
  3. Yahoo!
  4. Levi's
  5. Shell

Brandchannel If you were to describe yourself as being a brand, what brand would you be?
Top answers:
  1. Apple
  2. Nike
  3. Coca-Cola
  4. Virgin
  5. BMW
  1. Audi
  2. Target
  3. Toyota
  4. None
  5. Google
  1. Sony
  2. adidas
  3. Mercedes
  4. Chanel
  5. Pepsi
  1. Volkswagon
  2. Puma
  3. MINI
  4. Starbucks
  5. Disney

Which brand inspires you the most?
Top answers:
  1. Apple
  2. Nike
  3. Coca-Cola
  4. Google
  5. Starbucks
  1. Virgin
  2. BMW
  3. None
  4. Target
  5. Nokia
  1. Innocent
  2. adidas
  3. Dove
  4. Barack Obama
  5. Mercedes
  1. Disney
  2. Chanel
  3. Toyota
  4. Sony
  5. IKEA

If you could rebrand any brand, what brand would it be?
Top answers:
  1. Microsoft
  2. USA
  3. Ford
  4. Coca-Cola
  5. Pepsi
  1. General Motors
  2. None
  3. Gap
  4. Starbucks
  5. Sony
  1. BMW
  2. Nike
  3. Apple
  4. Reebok
  5. McDonald's
  1. Wal-Mart
  2. Levi's
  3. Mercedes
  4. Avon
  5. Sears

What brand can you not live without?
Top answers:
  1. Apple
  2. None
  3. Coca-Cola
  4. Google
  5. Starbucks
  1. Nokia
  2. Microsoft
  3. Pepsi
  4. Nike
  5. Sony
  1. McDonald's
  2. Colgate
  3. Nestlé
  4. Blackerry
  5. adidas
  1. Intel
  2. Procter & Gamble
  3. Dell
  4. BBC
  5. Target

What brand is most likely to revolutionize the branding industry in the next five years?
Top answers:
  1. Apple
  2. Google
  3. Doesn't exist yet
  4. Facebook
  5. Nike
  1. Nokia
  2. Virgin
  3. Microsoft
  4. YouTube
  5. Barack Obama
  1. Sony
  2. Toyota
  3. Coca-Cola
  4. Interbrand
  5. Starbucks
  1. Target
  2. Second Life
  3. China
  4. Samsung
  5. innocent

What brand do you think is truly (going) "green"?
Top answers:
  1. None
  2. Toyota
  3. BP
  4. The Body Shop
  5. Honda
  1. General Electric
  2. Virgin
  3. Patagonia
  4. Greenpeace
  5. Whole Foods Market
  1. Marks & Spencer
  2. Apple
  3. Wal-Mart
  4. Starbucks
  5. Innocent
  1. Shell
  2. BMW
  3. Seventh Generation
  4. Aveda
  5. Clorox
2007 Best Global Brands

Read more...

Monday, October 29, 2007

Steve Jobs Makes Bill Gates Look Like a Saint.

I get the feeling Steve Jobs is not a very nice person. This is not the first story I've heard about the kind of man he is. I apologize if it turns out Jobs is giving away his fortune anonymously and is some kind of saint, but I doubt it.

Jobs, worth $3.3 billion, making him the 67th richest American, is certainly in a position to make the world a better place, but if this story is any indication of the way he runs his business, I'll never buy an Ipod, iMac or anything with the Apple name. Viruses and all, I'll stick with Bill Gates...at least the guy puts his money where his mouth is.

I like Mr. William H. Gates, Sr., Bill Gate's father, as well. I posted about him a few years back.

William Gates Sr., Bill Gates' father, is an advocate for a fair economy and Responsible Wealth which is a national network of businesspeople, investors and affluent Americans who are concerned about deepening economic inequality and are working for widespread prosperity. Our three primary areas of work are tax fairness, corporate responsibility, and living wages.

He truly believes that the wealthiest of us have a debt to the "source of their opportunity" which is the United States that enabled them through a stable government that educates its citizens, provides law and order and keeps us safe from harm, and supports research that gives them the necessary information to build wealth.

Read more...
Iraq Deaths Estimator
Petitions by Change.org|Start a Petition »

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP