Showing posts with label election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label election. Show all posts

Sunday, November 11, 2012

US Government's Dual Accounting System and Their Enormous Hidden Surplus

Our nation was setup as a Republic supposedly governed by the "Rule of Law" in order to protect wealthy and powerful individuals and their property from the tyranny of government and the tyranny of the mob. It is not a democracy as we're so often told. But what they don't tell you is that our nation is a massive and all-powerful corporation, complete with a Dun and Bradstreet number(s). Not only that, every single agency, county, city, township, municipality, etc., is also a corporation, also complete with Dun and Bradstreet numbers.

While some may brush this aside as the government's need to act as a corporation in order to do business on a large scale--to purchase/to supply/invest--it does not explain the two sets of books the government keeps: public and "public".  The public budget, we're told, has such a severe deficit and that is used as justification for cutting basic human services to the 99% of taxpayers who have sacrificed a good portion of their paycheck to gain these services when most needed. However, what you're not told is that this public budget only records approximately only one-third of our tax money, which brings us to the "public" budget, where the other two-thirds is reported?

As I've posted about before: here, here, here, here, here, and here,  hidden in plain sight, silenced from public disclosure, it's called the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, the CAFR. These CAFRs, various “investment funds,” “dedicated funds” and “pension funds” show the billions, possibly trillions of public dollars that are not available to us.

"The scam works something like this: Anything that was a cost or expense for public services (the traditional side of the Annual Service Budget, such as the Department of Transportation, health and welfare, etc.) was reported on the Budget where public taxes paid 100% of the bill for those services...

However, any governmental agency that was a profit center (the Port Authority for New Jersey, the New Jersey Turnpike, an investment account, etc.) that generated non-tax revenue was “restricted by statute” from being reported in the Annual Budget. Why? Because the state legislature passed laws to prevent reporting the income from profit centers on the Budget. Instead, income from these profit centers was disclosed only on the CAFR.

But that disclosure was not immediately apparent. For example, when Mr. Burien looked for New Jersey’s 1989 “gross cash receipts” in the CAFR, he found the figure buried on page 174, under the “Waste Water Treatment Trust Fund.” It showed the amount of the total cash receipts for 1989 from all 69 autonomous state agencies and departments was almost $87 billion. In other words, New Jersey was charging $87 billion to provide $17 billion in public services. New Jersey citizens were paying $5 for every $1 in services they received, and the state was pocketing the other $4 as “profit”.

The CAFR also reported the state owned $32 billion in common stocks – but this figure was footnoted. The footnote revealed that the stocks were valued according to their original purchase price, not current market value. In other words, if the state bought a stock in 1968 at $1.25 a share and it’s worth $3,000 a share now, they still report it on the CAFR as worth $1.25 a share. Burien determined that the true market value for the “$32 billion” in stocks reported on the New Jersey CAFR was actually about $70 billion.[...]

[As of 1998] “CAFR reports indicate that the composite totals for all government
(Federal, state, county and city) ownership of publicly traded stock exceeds $32 TRILLION (53% of the total ownership of all listed stocks), $8 TRILLION in insurance company equity (should we be surprised by high priced mandatory auto insurance or unaffordable health care?), and $5 TRILLION in Bond Surety Escrow Accounts for future liability of existing or potential debt."
So while our legislators cry poverty and bankruptcy, proclaiming "austerity for the masses" from every rooftop, the truth is our government has a surplus of billions, if not trillions, in very profitable investments, unaccounted for in the budgets that  are disclosed to a very uninformed, and all too trusting We-the-People. That's right. Our federal and state governments own at least 53% of the stock in all publicly traded companies. This, of course, allows our government, at all levels, to wield enormous power over the stock market, and our economy in general, all the while casting "We, the People" into an ever-growing black hole.

Take the state of Washington's fiscal crisis and their proposal to use state higher education funds to gamble in the derivatives markets that was on the ballot--Washington SJR 8223, which thankfully did not win--once again and may be coming to a state near you. Many of these government investments are in toxic investment instruments such as collateralized debt options (CDOs) set on unstable “trading platforms,”  set to collapse in the near future. These toxic investment instruments are based on the purchase of packaged debts, and constitute legalized gambling on the stock markets with billion/trillions of our money using the most irresponsible methods imaginable. (1)

Moreover, there is a little known agency of the Federal Reserve called the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC) or Cede, INC. Notice, the website link is .com, not .gov. It is a private, for profit corporation as are all the government agencies. What is the DTCC? Well, once you invest money, as an individual or institutional, and it's registered with a stock broker, which is required, that money or investment is ceded--property of--to the DTCC. In other words, according to corrupt corporate statutory law, you no longer own that stock, you are a beneficiary.

(1) Now is the Time -
Rebecca Campbell, who owns this website, filed a lawsuit on behalf of all of the peoples of the world so that they might hold their own governments accountable for the crimes that these governments have perpetrated in their names against other peoples, as well as against themselves.

Read more...

Tuesday, November 06, 2012

Voting Charade

As someone commented on the George Carlin video below, "Fuck this illusory nonsense. It's hypocrisy disguised as righteousness and I'm sick of it."

Read more...

Monday, March 19, 2012

Rick Santorum and Gay Porn.

Couldn't resist posting this masterpiece: Rick Santorum composed entirely from gay porn.

Read more...

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Save Grandma! Pull the Plug on the Tea Party!

What happens when a tea-bagger loses his or her job and can't find another one? Do they still spout the Tea Party "redistribute my work ethic, not my wealth" rhetoric?  What happens when a tea-bagger gets old? Sick? Disabled?  Are their 401ks immune to market crash?  Do they live in a giant tea-potted alternative universe? They're so quick to demonize anyone who falls on hard times; so quick to protest Social Security, Medicare, and entitlement programs; so quick to jump on the corporate bandwagon and support the extension of Bush tax cuts for the wealthy...

As Rachel Maddow pointed out, Wall Street charges five times as much as the federal government does to manage retirement funds, not to mention, the risk considering Wall Street's nothing but a giant casino. 

If only Obama really would say this:
"Believe me...these people getting elected scare the hell outta me! President Obama needs to get up there and say: 'Listen people. I know you're frustrated. Let me tell you how frustrated...when I had to deal with my Dixiecrats. Let me tell ya..if you elect these people...remember during the debate for healthcare? That I was going to pull the plug on Grandma? Guess what? These people will!! They want to get rid of social security!! There's no Grandma left! -- Chris, who called Tom Ashbrook, host of On Point regarding tea party candidates.
Links: 

GOP ready to make 'Pledge to America'

Read more...

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Tea Party 'Astroturf Front for Corporate Agenda' Movement Gets Richer.

An anonymous donor contributed $1 million to the Tea Party Patriots, and the Tea Party's national coordinators who intend to use the funds to get out the vote for the Nov election.

Conveniently, the Tea Party Patriots are organized as a social welfare organization, [501(c)4 of the tax code], therefore not regulated by federal finance campaign laws and not required to disclose funding sources.
"As long as the Tea Party Patriots do not mention candidates' names in their material or explicitly advocate for or against a specific candidates' election, they don't have to meet federal requirements to disclose their donors.[...] There certainly seems to be an increase in the use of 501(c)4s to launder political donations. Big donors find them attractive because they can give money without getting their names in public." -- Paul Ryan, an expert at the Campaign Legal Center, a non-partisan watchdog group that monitors election law.
However, despite the anonymity of the donor, thanks to Jane Mayer's article in The New Yorker, Covert Operations , it's fairly safe to assume that the incredibly rich Koch brothers, of Koch Industries, an oil refiner and the nation’s second largest private company with about $100 billion in annual revenue, and who are tied at #24 on Forbes top billionaire's list  are behind most large donations.
Many of the groups on the right receive funding from a network of influential conservative foundations, including those connected to the Koch brothers of Wichita, Kan., who run the largest private energy firm in the United States. Records show that the Koch-connected Claude R. Lambe Charitable Foundation, for example, has given $3.1 million to Americans for Prosperity, a group that has taken a leading role in organizing "tea party protests" and other anti-reform efforts.






Links:

'Shadow RNC' American Crossroads Raises Millions in August from Wealthy Individuals, Corporations - American Crossroads is a tax-exempt group organized under section 527 of U.S. tax code, created to primarily influence elections. In July, the group registered with the Federal Election Commission as an independent expenditure-only committee and now reports its income and expenditures to the FEC on a monthly basis

Shadow RNC

Read more...

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Will Multinational Corporate Lobbyists Define America Now?

The Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission decision opened up a huge loophole in the restrictions that we have on foreign entities participating in our elections. Now, foreign corporations with U.S. subsidiaries will be able to make 'independent expenditures' to American political campaigns.

Democrats have already begun drafting legislation that could restrict the possibility of foreign influence in our election campaigns. However, it is doubtful that anything, short of a constitutional amendment, will impact on the ruling.

Democrats are also eyeing restrictions on U.S. companies that are subsidiaries of foreign-owned corporations; they believe the public will be outraged by the possibility of foreign influence in U.S. election campaigns. The high court's majority opinion avoided addressing possible implications for foreign-owned firms, which are barred from direct participation in U.S. elections but can use their American subsidiaries to form political action committees.
Foreign subsidiaries are already "lashing out at reports that congressional Democrats are looking to block foreign-owned corporations from seizing on the Supreme Court's campaign finance ruling last week".

Saudi Arabia has already asserted that the development of renewable energy is their biggest threat. Now, they can do something to stop their "biggest threat". Saudi Arabian-owned subsidiaries operating in the U.S. can and will expend as much as they want to advocate for the defeat of candidates who support clean energy legislation.

Tough legislation must be drafted to keep domestic corporations from operating on their own as if they were not foreign-controlled companies.

Read more...

Monday, June 29, 2009

Iran: Faces of the Dead and Detained


Help put a face to each of those hundreds - possibly thousands - killed or arrested since the Iranian election.

Other links that might help people understand better or support the Iranian people in their protests for democracy:

Why we protest - IRAN : Topics such as Keeping Your Anonymity In Iran; News and Current Events; Protest Advice; Activism resources; Help Iran Online; Translation: English to Farsi and Farsi to English; ETC...

Livestation : Free English versions of Al Jazeera, PressTV (Iran's state-controlled station), Russia Today, CCTV-9 (China), France 24...

Iran in crisis.

The fall-out from the Iranian presidential elections has reverberated around the world.

The BBC's World Affairs Editor, John Simpson, was in Tehran as the protests against the outcome of the vote reached their climax. John's been reporting on Iran since the Islamic revolution of 1979 and, in a change to the advertised schedule, he reflects on what he saw during the two weeks he was there.

In this special edition of Assignment, he reveals exclusive new material that exposes how the protests, and the police reprisals that followed, are intricately linked to the rivalry inside the clique of clerics who created the Islamic state.
Iranian Web Spying Aided by Western Technology:
The Iranian regime has developed, with the assistance of European telecommunications companies, one of the world's most sophisticated mechanisms for controlling and censoring the Internet, allowing it to examine the content of individual online communications on a massive scale (deep packet inspection).
Nokia Siemens Networks has stated that they sold the Monitoring Center to Iran but denies selling the Intelligence Platform. Here are the two Nokia Siemens products:

The Intelligence Platform
The Intelligence monitoring center

Read more...

Images of the Iranian Uprising

















"I received this from an anonymous Iranian student: “I will participate in the demonstrations tomorrow. Maybe they will turn violent. Maybe I will be one of the people who is going to be killed. I’m listening to all my favorite music. I even want to dance to a few songs. I always wanted to have very narrow eyebrows. Yes, maybe I will go to the salon before I go tomorrow!”

And she concludes: “I wrote these random sentences for the next generation so that they know we were not just emotional under peer pressure. So they know that we did everything we could to create a better future for them. So they know that our ancestors surrendered to Arabs and Mongols but did not surrender to despotism. This note is dedicated to tomorrow’s children.”

I bow my head to the youth of Iran, the youth that is open-eyed, bold and far more numerous than the near-beardless vigilantes. One such youth was Neda, whose music teacher, Hamid Panahi, was at her side when she died. I asked Panahi if she said anything after the bullet struck. “Yes,” he told me, “She said, ‘Mr. Panahi, I burnt.’"








Read more...

Thursday, August 21, 2008

John McCain is to the Economy as George W. was/is to Foreign Policy.

There's a refreshing lack of pretense about a man who doesn't know how many homes he owns ...it brings back memories of the 2000 election, when, then, Gov. George W. Bush, generated the "warmth" of the "regular" man, ignorant of the blue-blooded protocol and knowledge that seemed to radiate abundantly from his "eggheaded" opponent Al Gore.

That is, it's "refreshing" when your only expectation of that man is meeting him at the local pub to chug down a few brewskis and discuss the latest on your favorite team.

However, when the man in question is running for the most powerful office in the world, ignorance, and even worse, deliberate ignorance, can only serve to debilitate, drain, exhaust and impoverish our already weakened state.

John McCain's ignorance about information, almost as obvious as your given name, sheds additional light on John McCain's discomfort with anything related to finance or economics. Just as George W.'s deliberate ignorance of anything "international" - in combination with a multitude of other factors - has resulted in tragic consequences, John McCain's obvious disquietude about anything economic/financial could prove disastrous.

Read more...

Friday, April 11, 2008

Could John McCain Be Worse Than George Bush?

There is no doubt that John McCain is a man of integrity and has gained wisdom from what he has observed and encountered as a prisoner of war, however; in some ways, John McCain's "super-human" qualities...qualities that the average American does not have often times, may "over qualify" him to be President, if that's possible.

Yes, courage and integrity make for a great leader and God only knows we need one right now, but is John McCain that man? Can he really empathize with the average person? Can he put himself in the shoes of someone who may not be as strong as he is?


After writing the aforementioned words a few days ago, the facts have raised serious doubts about the "integrity" or "wisdom" I said John McCain gained from what he has observed and encountered as a prisoner of war, because the more I find out about John McCain the scarier it gets! Apparently his ignorance about the economy and my ignorance about him is only the tip of the iceberg.

From the Daily Kos:

In mid 2007, Senator Reid noted that McCain missed 10 of the past 14 votes on Iraq. However, here is a summary of a dozen votes (two that he missed and ten that he voted against) with respect to Iraq, funding for veterans or for troops, including equipment and armor. I have also included other snippets related to the time period when the vote occurred.

September 2007: McCain voted against the Webb amendment calling for adequate troop rest between deployments. At the time, nearly 65% of people polled in a CNN poll indicted that "things are going either moderately badly or very badly in Iraq.

July 2007: McCain voted against a plan to drawdown troop levels in Iraq. At the time, an ABC poll found that 63% thought the invasion was not worth it, and a CBS News poll found that 72% of respondents wanted troops out within 2 years.

March 2007: McCain was too busy to vote on a bill that would require the start of a drawdown in troop levels within 120 days with a goal of withdrawing nearly all combat troops within one year. Around this time, an NBC News poll found that 55% of respondents indicated that the US goal of achieving victory in Iraq is not possible. This number has not moved significantly since then.

February 2007: For such a strong supporter of the escalation, McCain didn’t even bother to show up and vote against a resolution condemning it. However, at the time a CNN poll found that only 16% of respondents wanted to send more troops to Iraq (that number has since declined to around 10%), while 60% said that some or all should be withdrawn. This number has since gone up to around 70%.

June 2006: McCain voted against a resolution that Bush start withdrawing troops but with no timeline to do so.

May 2006: McCain voted against an amendment that would provide $20 million to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for health care facilities.

April 2006: McCain was one of only 13 Senators to vote against $430,000,000 for the Department of Veteran Affairs for Medical Services for outpatient care and treatment for veterans.

March 2006: McCain voted against increasing Veterans medical services funding by $1.5 billion in FY 2007 to be paid for by closing corporate tax loopholes.

March 2004: McCain once again voted for abusive tax loopholes over veterans when he voted against creating a reserve fund to allow for an increase in Veterans' medical care by $1.8 billion by eliminating abusive tax loopholes. Jeez, McCain really loves those tax loopholes for corporations, since he voted for them over our veterans' needs.

October 2003: McCain voted to table an amendment by Senator Dodd that called for an additional $322,000,000 for safety equipment for United States forces in Iraq and to reduce the amount provided for reconstruction in Iraq by $322,000,000.

April 2003: McCain urged other Senate members to table a vote (which never passed) to provide more than $1 billion for National Guard and Reserve equipment in Iraq related to a shortage of helmets, tents, bullet-proof inserts, and tactical vests.

August 2001: McCain voted against increasing the amount available for medical care for veterans by $650,000,000. To his credit, he also voted against the 2001 Bush tax cuts, which he now supports making permanent, despite the dire financial condition this country is in, and despite the fact that he indicated in 2001 that these tax cuts unfairly benefited the very wealthy at the expense of the middle class.


More recently John McCain has not yet signed the "Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2007", which would establish a program of educational assistance for members of the Armed Forces who serve in the Armed Forces after September 11, 2001. Altogether, 52 senators, including nine Republicans have signed the bill, however; the bill needs 60 co-sponsors to make it filibuster proof.

So, after all that, I can answer the questions I posed a few days back:

Yes, courage and integrity make for a great leader and God only knows we need one right now, but is John McCain that man?

No, absolutely not.

Can he really empathize with the average person?

Obviously not.

Can he put himself in the shoes of someone who may not be as "strong" as he is?

No.

I should have known that anyone who would associate themselves with the greedy, brainless people who have ruined our economy is severely lacking in the wisdom, integrity and intelligence so desperately needed in our next leader.

Read more...

Monday, December 31, 2007

Biden says we Must "Reengage America in the World."

In November, 2007 U.S. Senator Joseph Biden, chairman of the Senate foreign relations committee and among the most experienced foreign policy experts in Washington, gave a speech before the Center for U.S. Global Engagement, called for "A New Approach to Pakistan." Biden is the only Presidential candidate who understands the ever-increasing complexity of global challenges and threats that America faces now and in the future.

We can't afford to elect another President who does not comprehend the ripple effect the smallest of his decisions can make, and because our world is shrinking, that those ripples can come back to us in the form of all consuming tidal waves the likes of which we've never seen.

Read more...

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

Connecting the Dots is Crucial to Our Survival


Joe Biden, presidential candidate and current chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, in a recent interview with Salon, spelled out why he calls himself the "odd man out"...because as he says he has the ability to "connect the dots".

He's right. More than ever we need a President who is an expert in foreign policy who has the ability to assemble the pieces, synthesize the information, and integrate the facts into a conceptual understanding...in other words, see the big picture. We're living in an age of specialization, which can be tremendously useful, and a great advantage as long as we continue to make the connections between the vastly different distinctions, all the while keeping things in proper perspective.

“Reason is understanding the connection between the general and the particular” -- Immanuel Kant

Ironically, Joe Biden's vote for the bankruptcy bill -- the bill I absolutely despise -- clarified my decision as to who I believe should replace Bush.

Unfortunately, Joe Biden resides in one of the only states in the country where there is no cap on interest rates credit card companies can offer, hence the reason every single credit card issuer incorporates in the state of Delaware, making it almost impossible to totally ignore their greedy demands. This puts Mr. Biden at a clear disadvantage if he decides to take on that industry.

As we all know, decisions are not always as clear cut as they appear. One must give priority to certain factors over others, weighing the pros and cons of each one and then incorporate what they've discovered to make a final decision that will hopefully support their overall agenda or goal.

Mindful of Mr. Biden's long history as a Senator including he was the youngest man elected to the Senate in history while at the same time having to overcome the tragedy of losing his wife and daughter in a car accident while raising two young sons, that he was listed as the "poorest" Senator in the Senate, that he drives an economical car, he commutes to Washington DC by train every day and overall has proven himself to be a man of integrity I came to the conclusion his decision may have been made taking the following into consideration.

He knew voting against the bill would make no difference to the outcome; he was pretty sure he would enter the 2008 Presidential race; he knew that foreign affairs is a critical issue to our future; and he knew his expertise in this area is far superior to all of the other candidates. Voting against the bill may have accomplished nothing more than to kill his political career at a time when his knowledge and leadership is invaluable to America.

Joe Biden's response voting for the bankruptcy bill:

"At the outset, I refused to support bankruptcy reform until fundamental changes were made. I fought to establish a "safe harbor" for those below their state's median income. I also insisted on a provision requiring lenders to post a clear warning about the dangers of making minimum monthly payments, one of the worst debt traps for consumers.

This bill establishes unprecedented protections for child support and alimony, making bankruptcy part of the enforcement system for women and children, who now will be at the head of the line, in front of every other creditor. Is this bill perfect? No. But over several congresses it has earned the kind of bipartisan consensus only balanced legislation can achieve."

We can no longer depend on our advantageous geographical location to protect us. As our world shrinks more and more each day, it is crucial to the survival of our country, perhaps the world, that our next President has the ability to as Joe Biden says, "connect the dots".

No candidate is perfect but there is no question Joe Biden has the integrity, strength, wisdom, experience and resolve needed to put this country back together.

Read more...

Sunday, February 04, 2007

I Really Like This John Edwards.


I wasn't overly impressed with John Edwards when he was running for Vice President in the last election. He exuded the charm of youthfulness with all the qualities associated with it, such as enthusiasm, energy and hope, but I found he lacked the depth that only reflection upon real life experience can bring. In a very short time, he has integrated his recent hardships; loss of the election; his wife's breast cancer, transforming himself into a person with a depth of understanding that can filter the inessential from the essential. He has learned in a few years what takes most of us a lifetime to learn, and I believe he has what it takes to lead our country.

Read more...
Iraq Deaths Estimator
Petitions by Change.org|Start a Petition »

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP