The Lawless America Revolution

Lawless America is a project created by William M. Windsor, and GRIP -- Government Reform & Integrity Platform dedicated to exposing dishonesty and corruption in government while presenting ways to battle this epidemic. Mr. Windsor ventured out, by himself, and interviewed thousands of people on a 173 day road trip throughout the United States. These stories are, plain and simple, horror stories of unbelievable accounts of judicial and government corruption. But as unbelievable as they sound, they're true. Most provide evidence, not to mention Mr. Windsor thoroughly checks out each person interviewed.

Ultimately, Mr. Windsor plans to edit the countless hours of the footage he's taken down to a two-hour film and enter it in the Sundance Film Festival. But his most important goal is to deliver the videos of testimony he's already produced to Congress the first weekend in February 2013.

Meet Me in DC. February 5-6, 2013.

"We hope to have at least one constituent for every member of Congress to hand-deliver the 50+ hours of Congressional testimony filmed by Lawless America from over 1,000 people filmed during the Road Trip....This is going to be a truly special event. Hundreds, perhaps thousands, of victims of government and judicial corruption will be in Washington DC. There has never been a larger group of whistleblowers to let their voices be heard. We will be presenting over 50 hours of testimony to Congress, part of over 2,000 hours of interviews conducted by Bill Windsor for Lawless America."

Here are a few stories that, in my humble opinion, are so compelling they should be considered required viewing.

Mind-blowing accounts of Child "Protective" Services and Family Court corruption:



Here (below) is the amazing story of Dr. Elizabeth Rohr of Dallas Texas, who, as someone commented: "Elizabeth's story sounds like the book of Job in the Bible" due to her well-connected monster ex-husband and the very corrupt Texas system of "justice."



See also: Another Family Blames Dawson State Jail For Inmate Death Dawson State Jail, where Dr. Rohr was incarcerated, is a low security facility for people convicted of non-violent crimes run by Corrections Corporation of America, a private prison management company that has a contract with the State of Texas. As Dr. Rohr stated in her testimony, inmates are treated like cattle, or worse.

Dawson State Jail Intolerable Conditions - more first hand accounts at the "house of horrors". Remember, these non-violent inmates are extraordinarily profitable for the prison industrial complex.

These are just...heartbreaking.

Read more...

When the Lie Becomes the Pillar of the State

In the Shadow of Hermes

The documentary In the Shadow of Hermes by Jüri Lina shows how freemasons, international bankers, and communists joined forces in an unholy alliance and through the Bolshevik Revolution of November 1917 established in Russia the most brutal and dehumanizing slave society the world has ever seen.

Russian writer Alexander Solzhenitsyn in 1974 admonished his countrymen:

"Live without lies!" This applies equally to the West. The Truth in our time is in no way self-evident. Most official facts about communism are not true. Solzhenitsyn emphasized: "In our country the lie has become not just a moral category, but a pillar of the state."

The facts have been suppressed both in the East and the West.

The film "In the Shadow of Hermes" is an important documentation of those financial masonic forces that cold-bloodedly worked behind the scenes through communism to profit from the suffering of others.

The director, Jüri Lina, stresses that it is his duty to tell the truth about communism and its grey eminences, and not just superficially treat its psychopathic symptoms, while the truth today is not highly valued.

History is made every day, but by whom? The answer is given in this film, the aim of which is to unmask the truth, despite the falsifications of history, so meekly reported by the media.

To know the real history of communism is the best insurance against ideological impostors. Based on the book "Under the Sign of the Scorpion" by the Estonian dissident Jüri Lina who narrates this documentary in Swedish.

Read more...

The Reagan Revolution Against the 99%.

Former CIA case officer, former member of National Security Council (NSC) and former CIA Angola Task Force Commander John R. "Bob" Stockwell provides an analysis of the Reagan Revolution. He discusses the fundamental restructuring of the economy and foreign policy, and how Reagan accomplished this. Stockwell scrutinizes Reaganomics and shows how it has weakened the U.S. economically while carrying out an enormous transfer of wealth from the poor and middle classes to the rich. He also criticizes the Reagan record on civil liberties and the interventionist foreign policy.

Recorded July, 1987
News: June 24, 1987; April 14, 1987

Read more...

The Myth of Spontaneous Revolution.

Do we, the masses, really desire "freedom"? Or, are "we" often pushed/inspired/coached to fight for our "freedom"? Were the French and American revolutions the result of an angry population? Or were they cultivated and provoked, perhaps, by another, more powerful entity with an agenda of destabilization and regime change?

Read more...

Read more...

The Black Awakening: Rise of the Satanic Super Soldiers and the Coming Chaos

After 28-years of research and hands on experience wrestling with the demons of ritual abuse victims plagued with intentionally created  Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD), Russ Dizdar  learned a lot about the incredible power of dissociative states.  Moreover,  from the multiples, themselves, he learned that a very sinister agenda behind the creation of these multiples, which led to his book: The Black Awakening: Rise of the Satanic Super Soldiers and the Coming Chaos.

What is The Black Awakening?  It is a day when the aforementioned victims, who Dizdar refers to as the "chosen ones",  will be unleashed on society on society to create hell on earth.  Sound like a horror movie?  It's not. It's a real possibility, and based on a very old strategy of inducing revolution - helter-skelter - to wipe away the old and bring in the new. Order out of chaos.

According to Dizdar, these sleeper assassins/anarchists have already infiltrated law enforcement, the military, the FBI, and first responder organizations, and when the time is right, they will be triggered.

What will they do? Well, already pre-programmed, they will target pastors, senators, military, and a whole host of people. They will shoot, kill, explode, shut down electrical grids, poison water, etc. Why? To collapse the US internally in order to create order out of chaos.

As farfetched as this may sound, there is plenty of evidence that this "Manchurian Candidate" type scenario is, indeed, very possible. Mr. Dizdar is not the first person to author a book on this subject.  Not only that, the CIA's mind control projects, still going on today, are public knowledge, now that the government has  declassified some of the documents that detail the workings of these projects.  In fact, many of the guardians of orthodox psychiatry were often themselves witting participants in MK/ULTRA.

Project Bluebird  was the CIA's first behavior modification program, initiated in 1949, overtaken by Project Artichoke in 1950 and then morphed into the massive Project MKULTRA in 1953.  These projects utilized the expertise of Nazi scientists brought over and released after WWII in the CIA created, Operation Paperclip.

After World War II, thousands of Nazi scientists, researchers and administrators were "smuggled" into the United States against direct written orders from President Harry S. Truman, through Operation Sunrise, Operation Blowback, Operation Paperclip and other covert ops.

Project Monarch appears to be the CIA undertaking most closely associated with MPD. It was originally called Marionette Programming prior to being imported from Nazi Germany. Through extreme trauma, conditioning, hypnosis, and chemicals, scientists came up with a sophisticated way to manipulate the mind to induce MPD, or Disassociative Disorder.

G.H. Estabrooks, a renowned psychiatrist and head of the American Psychological Association, in the 1940s, who was brought in by the CIA.  He was/ is the only mind-control doctor who has publicly acknowledged the building of "Manchurian Candidates". In his book Spiritism, Dr. Estabrooks describes experiments done to create multiple personality, and in his book Hypnotism, Dr. Estabrooks discusses the training of these sub-personalites in reconnaissance, assassination, and disinformation. He also states that the creation of experimental multiple personality for operational use in military subjects, whom he refers to as super spies, is ethical because of the demands of war.

“By the 1920’s not only had they [clinical hypnotists] learned to apply posthypnotic suggestion to deal with this weird problem [multiple personality], but also had learned how to split certain complex individuals into multiple personalities like Jeckyl-Hydes.…During World War II, I worked this technique with a vulnerable Marine lieutenant I’ll call Jones.…I split his personality into Jones A and Jones B. Jones A, once a ‘normal’ working Marine, became entirely different. He talked communist doctrine and meant it. He was welcomed enthusiastically by communist cells, and was deliberately given a dishonorable discharge by the Corps (which was in on the plot) and became a card-carrying party member.…Jones B was the deeper personality, knew all the thoughts of Jones A, was a loyal American and was ‘imprinted’ to say nothing during conscious phases. All I had to do was hypnotize the whole man, get in touch with Jones B, the loyal American, and I had a pipeline straight into the Communist camp. It worked beautifully.” G.H. Estabrooksn in a 1971 article in Science Digest

Dr. Estabrooks also did experiments on children. Four MKULTRA subprojects were on children. The deliberate creation of multiple personality in children is an explicitly stated plan in the MKULTRA Subproject Proposal submitted for funding on May 30, 1961.


As hard as this "horror movie" scenario is to believe, there is enough evidence to, at the very least, consider it as feasible. Public awareness, and/or the exposure is the only way to prevent or, at least, postpone the playing out of this Hegelian Dialectic.


Links:

Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance

Former Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in 1928, the framers of the Constitution sought "to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations." It is for this reason that they established, as against the government, the right to be let alone as "the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men."

BLUEBIRD Deliberate Creation of Multiple Personality by Psychiatrists By Colin A. Ross MD

"Multiple personality disorder patients in treatment throughout the United States and Canada are describing involvement in mind control research that is much more sophisticated than MKULTRA. Deliberate sexual abuse of children to make them more dissociative ... I would be pleased to testify at length at any hearings on CIA and military mind control." -- Colin Ross, M.D. Psychiatrist Richardson Texas

Neo Nazis are in the Army Now

Read more...

Earning the Right to Divorce

...or she does
I am not an attorney nor do I have in depth knowledge of the law, but after observing a few friends and family members going through divorce, the laws and rules of evidence and civil procedure regarding divorce confused me to say the least. After discussing this with many people, I discovered I was not the only one confused by "divorce court".

I believe my confusion stems from the establishment of no-fault grounds laws where neither party is considered at fault. I am not referring to childless couples, as I believe, in most instances; divorcing couples without children do not carry the same burden of responsibility as married couples with children. There are no innocent victims involved when a childless couple divorce.

This lack of a clearly defined "defendant" leads to what I would call a more casual atmosphere where the outcome of each case can partially result from the bond the attorneys have with the judges and/or the bond attorneys have with each other. More "off the record" discussions between attorneys and judges (I witnessed this first-hand) occur making impartiality practically impossible. In addition, the judge may be focused on adhering to the "no fault" aspect of the law, at the expense of true justice where the truly innocent (children) are protected. It's not the fault of the individual attorneys or judges, rather the "fault" of the "no fault" laws governing divorce that try so hard not to condemn either party that it overlooks the real victims, the children.

I understand the reason behind no fault divorce and agree that prior to the "divorce revolution" in the 1970s; divorce court did compromise the integrity of the American justice system by making perjury a likely occurrence. Anyone living in a marriage from hell will find a way to end their misery any way they can. The courts realized this and amended divorce legislation allowing spouses to initiate divorce proceedings without any proof of marital wrongdoing, therefore eliminating the need to fabricate situations to get out of one's commitment.

Yet, it seems this issue was solved at the peril of many other issues the most profound being the injustice to children. Children have financial and psychological advantages when both parents are married and fully supporting them. They lose these advantages when one or both parents decide to divorce because of the lack of adequate laws in place governing divorce. Therefore, unless the divorcing parents are diligent about putting the children first, the children become the victims through no fault of their own.

Non-adversarial divorce is not the problem in and of itself, rather there needs to be reform to the existing laws requiring both parents to be more responsible to their children. Currently, the children and/or the spouse without the career or the financial means usually suffer the most because "justice" is so expensive. If the parent retaining primary custody can afford to pay $300/hr to an attorney for countless hours, sometimes until that child is 18-years old, the child's rights will be protected. Most Americans do not have that kind of money, especially the parent normally left to care for the children. He or she, and the children are left at the mercy of the other spouse who makes the money and therefore wields the power.

Parents should be required to "earn" a divorce instead of having the divorce granted, just because one or both parents want it. An agreement in writing, providing specific details about how both parents intend to support their children in much the same way as when they were married, should be mandatory before the divorce decree is granted. In other words, the divorce decree comes after settlement takes place, not before, as it is now. Of course, this only applies if both spouses do not pose a danger to the children.

Marriage is a contract between two people and the government agreeing that each spouse is obliged to support the other and any offspring that should result of their marriage. The government, in return, will provide certain rights and protections -- over 1500 federal and approx. 500 state, depending on the state --to the married couple and their offspring. If the couple decides to end the contract, they should be obliged to support each other in the manner of which they grew accustomed when there are children involved, no matter what the socioeconomic status of the couple.

"We the People" end up paying for the "deadbeat dad" or mom who might make six-figures but just does not feel like living up to his or her responsibly any more. Currently, without the money and resources it's extremely difficult for the custodial parent to make the irresponsible parent face up to his or her responsibility, because the irresponsible parent has to turn into "Jack the Ripper" for the courts to aggressively pursue him or her and by the time the court finally does pin that parent down the child is usually married with kids of his or her own.

Instead of "No Fault" divorce, we should have "No Fault of the Children" divorce, putting the focus on children's rights first and taking the focus off making sure the ones truly at fault, the divorcing couple, remain faultless.

It seems another "divorce revolution" is needed to correct the injustices of the last one.

Read more...