No Worries. It's Just President Sanctioned Extrajudicial Murder.

Last month, the New York Times published an article about President Obama's "secret kill" list.   This list includes Americans and two teenagers, of which the one "looked even younger than her 17 years".   One has to ask what is the objective here? Why does our top secret government want this information made public?   Moreover, why hasn't there been any follow-up?  And why aren't more people demanding discussion on this issue?

In answer to the first couple of questions, there are a few possibilities. One, they're trying to rile us up into revolution in order to crack down and declare martial law. This possibility is clearly not working. Two, when the slaughtering state sets you in its sight, you cannot say you were not warned.  Three, it's a continuation, and I might add, an escalation, of the desensitization process, which is clearly working. Four, to instill terror, ensuring obedience to a ruthless state, plain and simple. Five, all of the above.

As to the rest of my questions, either we don't care, we don't take it seriously, or we would rather not face the fact that the Obama administration has just announced that it signed off on extrajudicial murder of people all over the world.

Could it be that the apathy of citizens, the lack of any kind of reaction is primarily due to this president's political affiliation: the Democratic party?  I mean, imagine, if you will, this "kill list" article  coming out at the time President Bush occupied the White House.  Somehow, I think there would be outrage, and rightly so.

Now, is President Obama the first president in the history of the US to have a secret kill list? Absolutely not. To be sure, both former President Bush's, and Reagan had their secret kill lists. What makes President Obama's kill list stand out is the deliberate publication of such a list, not to mention the method by which he creates it on a weekly basis.

And to think this is an election year should tell you all you need to know.