Sounds of Silence Technologies and Nervous System Manipulations and HDTV.

By now, most people are familiar with the terms, 'neuromarketing' and 'neuroeconomics', and most people have heard of the CIA mind control research program that lasted from the 1950s through the 1970s, called Project MK-ULTRA.   These experiments were often conducted without the subjects' knowledge or consent.

To be sure, whatever was discovered some 50-years ago is considered child's play, today, as we live in a era of exponential technological growth with no end in sight. In fact, psychotrnic weapons, which are non-lethal weapons that use electromagnetic waves to effect the "human nervous system and brain, altering emotional states and behavior" dates back to the 1930s. 

In January, 1991, in the first Gulf War, Silent Sound Spread Spectrum (SSSS) waves were used against Iraqi troops to cause mass surrender (without a shot being fired) of thousands of Iraqi troops from underground bunkers in Kuwait and Iraq.

The physical, emotional, and psychological effects of this technology were so severe that hundreds of thousands of Iraqi troops surrended en masse without firing even a single shot against US led coalition forces. The numbers reported in the news were staggering: 75,000 and then annother 125,000 (or more) Iraqi troops would come out of their deep desert bunkers waving white flags and falling to their knees before approaching US troops and literally kiss their captor’s boots or hands if given the opportunity.

The technology called FMRI (Functional Magnetic Resonance) Patent for ssss waves

USP # 6,488,617 (December 3, 2002)

Title: Nervous System Manipulation by EM Fields from Monitors.

Issued to: Loos, Hendricus.

Abstract: Physiological effects have been observed in a human subject in response to stimulation of the skin with weak electromagnetic fields that are pulsed with certain frequencies near 1/2 Hz or 2.4 Hz, such as to excite a sensory resonance.

Many computer monitors and HD TV screens, when displaying pulsed images, emit pulsed electromagnetic fields of sufficient amplitudes to cause such excitation. It is therefore possible to manipulate the nervous system of a subject by pulsing images displayed on a nearby computer monitor or DIGITAL TV set. For the latter, the image pulsing may be embedded in the program material, or it may be overlaid by modulating a video stream, either as an RF signal or as a video signal.
The image displayed on a computer monitor may be pulsed effectively by a simple computer program.

For certain monitors, pulsed electromagnetic fields capable of exciting sensory resonances in nearby subjects may be generated even as the displayed images are pulsed with subliminal intensity.

The following is from a study published by the U.S. Army’s Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) released under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The section titled “Incapacitation Effect: Microwave Hearing,” reads as follows:

Microwave hearing is a phenomenon, described by human observer as the sensations of buzzing, ticking, hissing or knocking sounds that originate within or immediately behind the head. There is no sound propagating through the air like normal sound. This technology in its crudest form could be used to distract individuals: if refined, it could also be used to communicate with hostages or hostage taken directly by Morse code or other message systems, possibly even by voice communications.

Application of the microwave hearing technology could facilitate a private message transmission. It may be useful to provide a disruptive condition to a person not aware of the technology. Not only might it be disruptive to the sense of hearing, it could be psychologically devastating if one suddenly heard “voices within one’s head.”

Congressman Dennis Kucinich attempted to ban “non-lethal” weapons in (HR2977), Space Preservation Act of 2001.

Links:

“Bioeffects of Selected Nonlethal Weapons,” U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM), 17 February 1998

This addendum to Nonlethal Technologies -- Worldwide (NGIC-1147-101-98) study addresses, in summary, some of the most often asked about questions of non-lethal weapons technology, the physiological responses observed in clinical settings of the biophysical coupling and susceptibility of personnel to nonlethal effects weapons.

We are moving ever closer to the era of mind control

Books:

"Hidden Persuaders” by Vance Packard, 1957

“Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television,” by Jerry Manders 1977

Read more...

Devastating Power of Nuclear Weapons!

Read more...

What the Hell is Going On?

Larry Johnson from No Quarter asks the following questions:

"What the hell is going on?"

"Why would we want to preposition nuclear weapons at a base conducting Middle East operations?"

"Did someone at Barksdale try to indirectly warn the American people that the Bush Administration is staging nukes for Iran?"

Read more...

Family Fun?

A planned Republican fundraiser in New Hampshire aims to promote gun ownership in America by letting supporters fire powerful military-style weapons -- from Uzi submachine guns to M-16 rifles.
The Manchester Republican Committee is inviting party members and their families to a "Machine Gun Shoot" where, for $25, supporters can spend a day trying out automatic weapons, said organizer Jerry Thibodeau.
"It's a fun day. It's a family day," said Thibodeau of the August 5 event. "It's quite exciting."
Local Democrats say the event is in poor taste amid a spike in violent crime in Manchester and seeks to glorify the use of machine guns for political gain. The right to own guns has come under heightened scrutiny since the April shooting at Virginia Tech where a gunman killed 32 people.
"It is downright offensive," Chris Pappas, the Manchester Democratic party chairman, told the Union Leader newspaper.
Thibodeau said he invited all the Republican candidates in the 2008 presidential race to the event at Pelham Fish and Game Club outside of Manchester, the state's largest city, but he said they declined. He said all shooters would undergo training.
Buying a gun in New Hampshire, whose official motto is "Live Free or Die," is relatively easy.
The state does not require buyers to obtain a handgun license or undergo safety training before buying a handgun, according to the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, a gun-control lobby group.

Read more...

Is Bush Leading Us to Nuclear War?

As we know, the Bush administration is very concerned about eliminating nuclear programs in other countries, especially in the Middle East. At the same time, Bush is building our nuclear weapons program up, spending more money on it than we spent during the Cold War.

The Bush administration is pumping this money -- more than $6 billion this year -- into renovating the nuclear weapons complex and designing new nuclear weapons. Such hypocrisy is one of the main obstacles to nuclear arms reductions because it runs the risk of shattering the 1970 Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty in which the nuclear-armed states pledged to begin the process of disarmament if the non-nuclear states opted not to pursue the deadly technology.

The centerpiece of the administration's move toward developing a new generation of nuclear weapons is "Complex 2030," a multiyear plan introduced last April by the National Nuclear Security Administration (the semi-autonomous agency within the Department of Energy that oversees the nuclear weapons program).

Complex 2030 calls for the construction of new or upgraded facilities at each of the National Nuclear Security Administration's eight nuclear weapons-related sites throughout the country. The plan also calls for building a new nuclear weapon, the Reliable Replacement Warhead (RRW), inside the old warheads. The program was conceived in response to concerns that the cores of existing nuclear weapons could be wearing out and need to be replaced. But RRW development has gone much further than that.

The Department of Energy (DOE) notes in its summary of Complex 2030 that one of the major goals of the program is to "improve the capability to design, develop, certify and complete production of new or adapted warheads in the event of new military requirements." In short, while the Bush administration has publicly stressed reductions in nuclear weapons, it is working to produce new, more usable nuclear weapons.

Read more...

Have We Become Dependent on the Military-Industrial Complex?

With 737 military bases in over 130 countries, it's hard to argue that the United States has not become dependent on "The Military-Industrial Complex" Dwight D. Eisenhower spoke of in his farewell address to the nation, January 17, 1961.

The weapons industry survives only if the creation of local, regional, and global conflicts continues. Therefore, the United States, being the largest manufacturer and exporter of weapons in the world, has a huge stake in making sure there is always great demand for this industry's products.

From a very practical point of view, it only makes sense that the planning and plotting of present and future wars is ongoing. This may also answer the question why America consistently contributes toward the creation of dictatorships that prove afterwards to be so brutal, and why we augment the weaponry of both our ally and foe at the same time as we are currently doing in Iraq.

Chalmers Johnson, in a trilogy of books, tells us that history has shown there is no more unstable combination than that of a domestic democracy and a foreign empire. In his first book, Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire, published the year before 9/11, he explained why we are hated around the world and why our long history of secret operations overseas would surely lead to retaliation at home.

In a follow up called The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic , Chalmers Johnson described a global network of military bases he says creates a modern version of colonialization.

Johnson's final book, Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic demonstrates why he believes the maintenance of the American empire will inevitably undercut our domestic democracy and lead to either military dictatorship or to its civilian equivalent.

In addition to President Dwight D. Eisenhower, other great leaders have warned us about the military-industrial complex:

"Hence, likewise, they will avoid the necessity of those overgrown military establishments which, under any form of government, are inauspicious to liberty, and which are to be regarded as particularly hostile to republican liberty."

- George Washington 1796.

"Our country is now geared to an arms economy bred in an artificially induced psychosis of war hysteria and an incessant propaganda of fear."

-- General Douglas MacArthur

"As a result of the war, corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed. I feel at this moment more anxiety for the safety of my country than ever before, even in the midst of war.God grant that my suspicions may prove groundless."

-- U.S. President Abraham Lincoln, Nov. 21, 1864

There is still time to take back our country on the principles of which it was founded if "We the People" start paying attention to the actions of those we elect to lead us with the same fervor we have when watching our favorite team play. With that kind of scrutiny, our government could never get away with the atrocities it is capable of creating.

"We have the greatest opportunity the world has ever seen, as long as we remain honest which will be as long as we can keep the attention of our people alive. If they once become inattentive to public affairs, you and I, and Congress and Assemblies, judges and governors would all become wolves."

-- Thomas Jefferson

Read more...

US Iran Attack Plans Revealed

US contingency plans for air strikes on Iran extend beyond nuclear sites and include most of the country's military infrastructure, the BBC has learned.

It is understood that any such attack - if ordered - would target Iranian air bases, naval bases, missile facilities and command-and-control centres.

The US insists it is not planning to attack, and is trying to persuade Tehran to stop uranium enrichment.

The UN has urged Iran to stop the programme or face economic sanctions.

But diplomatic sources have told the BBC that as a fallback plan, senior officials at Central Command in Florida have already selected their target sets inside Iran.

That list includes Iran's uranium enrichment plant at Natanz. Facilities at Isfahan, Arak and Bushehr are also on the target list, the sources say.

Two triggers

BBC security correspondent Frank Gardner says the trigger for such an attack reportedly includes any confirmation that Iran was developing a nuclear weapon - which it denies.

Alternatively, our correspondent adds, a high-casualty attack on US forces in neighbouring Iraq could also trigger a bombing campaign if it were traced directly back to Tehran.

Long range B2 stealth bombers would drop so-called "bunker-busting" bombs in an effort to penetrate the Natanz site, which is buried some 25m (27 yards) underground.

The BBC's Tehran correspondent France Harrison says the news that there are now two possible triggers for an attack is a concern to Iranians.

Authorities insist there is no cause for alarm but ordinary people are now becoming a little worried, she says.

Deadline

Earlier this month US officials said they had evidence Iran was providing weapons to Iraqi Shia militias. At the time, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said the accusations were "excuses to prolong the stay" of US forces in Iraq.

Middle East analysts have recently voiced their fears of catastrophic consequences for any such US attack on Iran.

Britain's previous ambassador to Tehran, Sir Richard Dalton, told the BBC it would backfire badly by probably encouraging the Iranian government to develop a nuclear weapon in the long term.

Last year Iran resumed uranium enrichment - a process that can make fuel for power stations or, if greatly enriched, material for a nuclear bomb.

Tehran insists its programme is for civil use only, but Western countries suspect Iran is trying to build nuclear weapons.

The UN Security Council has called on Iran to suspend its enrichment of uranium by 21 February.

If it does not, and if the International Atomic Energy Agency confirms this, the resolution says that further economic sanctions will be considered.

Read more...