This is a Test of the National Elite Big Brother Association!

Terrorism is not defined by its intentions to kill a few people, or even more than a few people; it is to bring about mass terror...to paralyze a people in fear, and to dent the public purse of their target. The Boston Marathon was a relatively small event, in comparison to let's say a nuclear attack on one or more of our cities. Yet, despite this, our government launched full scale--extraordinarily expensive-- martial law, which, incited much more fear than the attack itself. House to house paramilitary searches of homes, making innocent American citizens blatantly submit to the state is about as un-American as it gets.

What happened to, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Meanwhile, those in authority treat the public as if they're in Kindergarten: "Stop asking questions," and "Wait for further instructions."

Not to say that there is a lot of subtle disinformation out there regarding the Boston Marathon bombing. You have to really pay attention to catch it, otherwise, it appears legitimate. However, there are more than enough signs that this event is much bigger than the two boys accused.

One, being the the questions that the authorities refuse to take seriously.

Two, the lack of tangible quality evidence--video, images, etc.-- presented to the public.

Three, the lack of due process afforded to the accused.

Fourth, the media frenzy that surrounded this event. Always a red flag!

Lastly, but perhaps, most importantly, the unbelievable and unprecedented scale and nature of the response from the American government to supposedly, catch a teenage "terrorist". Even if he was a terrorist, shutting down an entire city, and overrunning its streets with paramilitary-cops, in humvees with manned machine gun turrets on top, barking orders in residential neighborhoods, while snipers aim at innocent families, with orders that people come out of their homes, and then the invading and searching--without legal basis-- of those homes, is that the kind of nation we want to live in?

They claim it wasn't martial law, that it was a "Stay-In-Place" order, and that compliance was somehow, voluntary. Really? When dozens of cops dressed in SWAT gear--armed with fully automatic rifles--trained snipers positioned on neighboring rooftops, and tanks parked outside your house, what kind of choice is that? I don't care how many guns you own, you're outgunned. To protest would be suicide. I think the message is clear, "cooperate, or else". You and your family have no choice. Not to mention, it gives the police ample opportunity to plant evidence. However, there was a choice made to cheer the tyrannical oppressors after all was said and done. What's funny if there is anything funny in a situation like this, is that the seige everyone cheered for did not find the suspect.

So, what now?

Will cities, states, perhaps, even our entire nation go into "lock down" mode every time a serial killer's on the loose? Every time an "underwear bomber" gets loose? Every time a bomb goes off?

Read more...

Big Pharma and the Nazi Roots of the European Union.

Slowly but surely, step by step, over the last six decades, Europe has appeared to be awkwardly stumbling toward a more cohesive union, thee Brussels European Union (EU). I say appeared because the truth is, from the very beginning, dating back to 1938--officially--the path of this union was a carefully planned route to establishing a dictatorship of corporate interests in Europe.

That's right, the people conducting the monstrous medical experiments were only executing the commercial interests of Bayer and Hoecht, who wanted to test their newly patented drugs in Auschwitz and Buchenwald to ready them for the world market. The bottom line here is that the history leading up to the gradual establishment of the EU is much more interesting, and in some ways, much worse, than what's reported in the mainstream media or taught in the schools. Of course, this is true for most of history, but I digress.

Before we get started, please take note of the propaganda terminology, or Nazi Newspeak, that is used in documents, speeches, and articles before, during and after the war. For example, the inscription on the Auschwitz concentration camp that read: "Labor liberates" was this Oil and Drug cartel's Nazi new-speak for extermination through labor.

Okay, back to the Nazi roots of the EU. It was German Scientific Researcher,  Dr. Matthais Rath, former director of the Linus Pauling Institute and now director of the Rath Foundation, who, while investigating problems of human health, discovered approximately 50,000 documents that reveal and prove that the "undemocratic structure of the “Brussels EU” has its roots in the post WWII plans of the IG Farben/Nazi-coalition in a conquered Europe." Moreover, he discovered that patents--in this case, Big Pharma--are used as a tool for obstructing innovation in the area of health and welfare, that the un-patentable--vitamins and other natural substances--are being actively fought against for primarily economic reasons. After all, perpetuating illness is big business.

Here's the dirty little secret that is gradually being exposed through people like Dr. Rath and author of IBM and the Holocaust, amongst several other very well documented books, Edwin Black.  WWII, like WWI was initiated on behalf of the German pharmaceutical/chemical cartel, and other commercial interests. Hitler and the Nazis were merely the ruthless puppets; yes, the corporate interests invested in the Nazis. In fact, unbeknownst to many, after the war, in 1945, 24 men from IG Farben were put on trial for their crimes. The IG Farben cartel became the largest supporter of the Nazi's rise to power, and eventually the rise of the Brussels European Union. The terms 'coalition' and 'marriage' were used during the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunals to characterize the relationship between the Cartel and the Nazis in preparing and launching WWII.

"The I.G. Farben Trial, the sixth Subsequent Nuremberg Proceeding, was tried by Military Tribunal VI, which had been created by the US Military Government for Germany on August 8, 1947.

An indictment filed on May 3 named 24 defendants, all in the I.G. Farben industrial concern, and listed five counts: the planning, preparation, initiation, and waging of wars of aggression and invasions of other countries; committing war crimes and crimes against humanity through the plunder and spoliation of public and private property in countries and territories that came under German occupation; committing war crimes and crimes against humanity through participating..."

After WW II, in the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal, the military and political puppets, the Nazi henchmen, were presented to the world, a few punished for their egregious crimes against humanity, while the engineers of the war, the puppeteers and political experts for the Cartel's conquest plans escaped, receiving at most, a slap on the wrist behind the scenes.

For example, in 1948, the CEO of Bayer, Fritz Ter Meer was sentenced to seven years in prison in the Nuremberg Trials. By 1956, he was not only out of prison, but, once again, chairman of the board at Bayer, the corporate flagship and driving force of the Brussels EU. However, that's only a small part of the story, there is so much more. The European Union was planned well in advance to WW II.  Not to mention,  the overall process began before WW I.

The key architect or founding father (12 founding fathers) of the EU,  known as "the first King of modern Europe" was a man named, Walter Hallstein, a prominent lawyer in Nazi Germany. As a prominent lawyer, he was a member of the delegation, "Working Group of German-Italian Legal Relations," obviously a deceptive cover.  In June 1938, the Hitler regime sent Hallstein to Rome to negotiate with Mussolini's lawyers to lay the dictatorial framework for the EU. His assignment: "to model the 'Brussels EU' after the original plans of the Nazi/IG Farben coalition to rule Europe through a 'Central Cartel Office'."

After the war, Hallstein was interrogated by the Denazification committee of the allies. However, he blatantly denied any association with the Nazis when, in reality, he was associated with the most notorious professional pillar of the Nazi regime  called the Rechtswahrer Organization or the Nazi Association of Law Protectors .

From there he was picked up by the first German chancellor, from the IG Farben cartel, Konrad Adenauer--several chancellors came directly from this cartel--and promoted to first chief negotiator for preparing the Rome treaties, which became the legal foundation of the Brussels EU in 1957. Subsequently, he was promoted by West German government as the first president of the EU commission, and was given a staff of  8,000  to create what we know today as the Brussels EU.

The EU has the exclusive right to initiate legislation. It's an outright dictatorship on behalf of corporate interests masked by the propaganda that praises Europe as the model of peace and prosperity. The ultimate goal is the subjugation of Europe --and later, the entire world--under complete economic, political, and judicial control of the Nazi/IG Farben coalition better known as the "Thousand Year Reich".

Fast forward to today and the global powers have not yet given  up.  Far from it.  While they are forgoing a military attempt to finally institute this global dictatorship, they are, instead, using economic strangulation and political coercion to further their long-term economic and political goals.

Links:

Interview with Dr. Rath.

The Nazi Roots of the Brussels EU

Read more...

Technotronic Society: Living to 1,000 Years Old and Technological Feudalism.

The "technetronic" society - "a society that is shaped culturally, psychologically, socially, and economically by the impact of technology and electronics—particularly in the area of computers and communications." that Zbigniew Brzezinski predicted in his book, Between Two Ages : America's Role in the Technetronic Era is here.  In this book, he argued that in order to prevent global instability from emerging from economic equality, developed nations would have to come together to coordinate policy.  In other words, a new world order.

It's interesting to note that two years prior to writing the book, "Between Two Ages", Brzezinski wrote an article called "America in the Technetronic Age" for the CIA-funded publication , "Encounter Magazine" which is no longer published, of which he wrote:.

"At the same time, the capacity to assert social and political control over the individual will vastly increase. As I have already noted, it will soon be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and to maintain up-to-date, complete files, containing even most personal information about the health or personal behaviour of the citizen, in addition to more customary data.

These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities. This will encourage tendencies through the next several decades toward a technotronic era, a dictatorship, leaving even less room for political procedures as we know them.

Finally, looking ahead to the end of the century, the possibility of biochemical mind control and genetic tinkering with man, including beings which will function like men and reason like them as well, could give rise to some difficult questions". - Zbigniew Brzezinski, "America in the Technetronic Age" The Encounter. January, 1968

There is no doubt that humanity is on the cusp of developing the capacity to transcend itself, creating a superior life-form that will transcend human limits. This, hands down, is the biggest challenge to society in this new age...actually,  in the history of humankind, this potential ability to transform man into Nietzsche's "Overman" (Übermensch), essentially, god-men.

According to gerontologist Aubrey de Grey the person who lives to be 1,000 years-old has already been born. This should raise the question, who gets to live to be 1,000-years old? Because, surely, this only applies to those who can afford to live that long. We can't even deal with the extended life span of baby boomers, most of which will not even make it to 100 years!  Not to mention, our current materialistic value system, where, as Martin Luther King said, "machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people", makes the likelihood of an extension of even 50 years very problematic for the 99%.

The exploitative transnational elites.

And unfortunately, from what we've seen thus far, the maxim, 'power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely, is absolutely true. Not so long ago, the manifestation of this maxim was clearly seen in Nazi Germany, which one can argue, lurks beneath the surface of our current political power structure. Truth be told, a covert system of eugenics and classism is already in place.  Granted, this system cannot be compared to Hitler's system; however, the less money, the less white, the less power and status you have, the less likely it is that you will receive health care,  or have the resources needed to extend your lifespan.   However, now that we're face to face with the prospect of people living 1,000 years, to be sure, the emergence of a bolder, in your face techno-eugenics system of mass control and technological feudalism/classism is all but inevitable. That is, if left in the hands of the exploitative, transnational elites, which, of course, it will be..

In 1958, Aldous Huxley wrote in Brave New World Revisited, “The future dictator’s subjects will be painlessly regimented by a corps of highly trained social engineers.” He quotes an advocate of this new science: "The challenge of social engineering in our time is like the challenge of technical engineering 50-years ago. If the first half of the twentieth century was the era of technical engineers, the second half may well be the era of social engineers." He then went on to say, “The twenty-first century, I suppose, will be the era of World Controllers, the scientific caste system and Brave New World.”

As Brzezinski noted, "in the industrial age, the introduction of the machine was the beginning of utopia; for others it meant the unleashing of evil".  In the technotronic age, the introduction of transhumanism is the beginning of utopia; for the great majority it means the potential unleashing of an evil that most cannot imagine.

"Human life is reduced to real suffering, to hell, only when two ages, two cultures and religions overlap. . . .There are times when a whole generation is caught in this way between two ages, two modes of life, with the consequence that it loses all power to understand itself and has no standard, no security, no simple acquiescence." —Herman Hesse, Steppenwolfe

Related Links:

In An Appraisal of the Technologies of Political Control, author Steve Wright observed that a revolution in military affairs was indeed occurring, and warned that the technology will be used by the security forces of various countries for suppressing internal dissent.

Read more...

Scaring the American Public into Submission

Paul Craig Roberts who was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration warns,

"Unless Congress immediately impeaches Bush and Cheney, a year from now the United States could be a dictatorial police state at war with Iran."

The Bush Administration is in a no-win situation right now and the only way out is scaring the American public into submission with something on the scale of 9/11.

Ask yourself: Would a government that has lied us into two wars and is working to lie us into an attack on Iran shrink from staging "terrorist" attacks in order to remove opposition to its agenda?

Read more...

US in Danger of a Dictatorship.

Presidential candidate Ron Paul has cautioned that the United States is now at a crisis point. He feels "the people", so indifferent to protecting their liberties, are opening the door for a dictatorship. The "elite" may be preparing a take-over even if it means they must make up events to scare "the people".

He has a point.

Read more...