Imposing a Gender Neutral Gender Fluid World Order?

Immediately after a baby is born, before it is even handed over to the mother, "It's a boy!" or "It's a girl!" is exclaimed in celebration of a precious new life. Why? Because it's so obvious at first glance and really it's the only thing we can determine at this point, all the immutable rest--height, shoe size, etc.-- about this new life will slowly unfold over time. But if external genitalia is not enough--as it's not in incredibly rare cases of hermaphroditic anatomy (0.02% of newborns)--to convince one of the biological reality of males and females, different chromosomes, genes (new study finds 6,500 genes expressed differently according to biological sex), hormones, and internal reproductive organs or lack thereof, and later on, secondary sex characteristics (body shape, voice pitch, breasts, facial hair, etc.) should. Yet, we're told otherwise because...

...gender is irrelevant, yet, at the same time, more relevant than ever before, in the 21st century!

And so it is that gender identity has blossomed into an inescapable frontline issue. You can't turn on your TV, radio, Internet, or open a magazine or newspaper without being confronted with massively-funded gender politics, or more accurately, gender propaganda that cloaks itself in virtue, tolerance, social-justice and anti-bullying campaigns. This so-called fight for gender justice calls for new legislation, educational reform, and a total attitude readjustment for the masses that obliterates fundamental biological differences and once again, tries to redefine nature and turn creation on its head.

'Theybies': Letting Children Decide Their Gender

Is your baby a boy or a girl? Maybe, it’s a “theyby,” or maybe it's a dog or a cat or a labrat. Yes, there is a movement that wants to impose unisêx existence on children keeping their sêx a secret from everyone and referring to individuals in the plural. If this isn't an example of how a post-truth culture of personal conviction evolving into an Alice in Wonderland world, I don't know what is. "Theybies" is the result of the soft-headed, tender-minded ideology and post-modern imaginary thinking world of the coming global civilization as observational and scientifically proven reality is replaced with globally-dictated fantasies that are projected into the immense void that was created when Truth was obliterated. In this case, children become labrats when the will of God is replaced with the will of those who think they are gods or wannabe gods.

Please don't misunderstand.  Like so many people, I was a prime target for bullies throughout my childhood. I was bullied for being too tall, for wearing glasses, for being too shy, for having curly hair, for squinting in the sun, etc., etc. It has left me with my own scars to bear, with a nebulous sense that something was/is wrong with me, with an internalized sense of otherness, and with a sense of disempowerment, because the damage continues even after the bullying has stopped. After a while, children constantly intimidated, harassed and bullied for who they are perceived to be can't help but start to believe their bullies. On the other hand, being bullied in childhood has given me great compassion, sympathy, and empathy for victims of bullies, for underdogs, and the marginalized. In other words, I am in no way condoning bullying behavior, and/or overlooking the plight of those who can't conform to gender stereotypes nor those who are attracted to their own gender. But feelings and beliefs do not determine reality. If that were so I guess I'm 5'8" instead of 6'6". I guess I'm 34-years old instead of 56-years old. I guess I'm black instead of white.  I guess I'm a giraffe instead of a human being....

Although this is changing, most people know  that children  who don't conform to gender roles/norms are at highest risk of abuse by not only their peers but by adults--teachers, parents, coaches, bus drivers,, etc.-- as well. These children are punished every day for failing to fit the ideals of the traditional gender binary. To simply say this is wrong--punishing children for failure to conform to biological sex-- is woefully understated. However, the answer is not to eliminate gender as if that is even possible. The answer is not to encourage children to change their gender at will or replace the gender binary with an array of choices that boggles even the most mature mind. The answer is not to educate children about various forms of sexuality before they even understand sexuality itself. The answer is not to punish those who identify as male or female, and/or punish those who "maintain that there are men and there are women and that the difference between them is fundamental." Well, you get the picture.

My point is that the bullying issue--an issue that's been around since the dawn of man--should not be fodder for cultural and political agendas, because, you see, national "anti-bullying" campaigns and educational reform and adding more laws to the books  have very little to do with stopping bad behavior or with protecting the traditional targets of bullies and everything to do with creating an Orwellian postmodern society that denies objective and immutable reality; it has everything to do with socially engineering dysfunction because in doing so, they create an indoctrinated, traumatized population  that will accept the illusion they call "reality," where hate is love, war is peace, white is black (see Rachel Dolezal’s claim to identify as a black woman when she is clearly not) and people are genderless, like robots.

Under the guise of "social justice" and "anti-bullying", the political elite use the machinery of state education, the mainstream media, and their power to craft legislation to compel children and adults alike into adopting "politically correct" attitudes that supplant objective reality with the supremacy of the subjective desire of elite globalists who push extreme egalitarianism to the point that anyone who states evidence of difference is considered a bigot and/or prejudiced. Today, even to question the notion of gender fluidity is considered a hate crime in a growing number of  circles, despite the fact that it leaves children confused or distressed as the political elite endeavor to "undo" normative concepts of fixed, binary gender identities within our culture.

Gender politics continues to escalate despite the fact that incidents of bullying and intimidation have dropped markedly in recent years, according to surveys by the Department of Justice, yet the transgender or gender neutralizing ideological propaganda continues.  People who don't feel comfortable identifying with their biology are real human beings and should be taken seriously, they should not be marginalized, however transforming the problems of an infinitesimally small fraction of the population into an ideology, a movement that in reality is cover for a much more sinister agenda is not the solution.

“And while the task force gives the impression that LGBT students are a primary focus of bullying, evidence suggests that the vast majority of bullying is directed at other students. The DOJ surveys indicate that the percentage of 12- to 18-year-old students who reported being targets of hate-related words based on their sexual orientation fell from 1.0 percent in 2007 to 0.6 percent in 2009.

You see, this is why modern day "scientists"  claim "philosophy is dead" because by eliminating philosophical and critical thinking,  it allows them to recreate reality on their own terms  and push it on a highly brainwashable population who has been taught what to think, not how to think.

“Philosophy is dead is the declaration of scientific materialists because it leaves the individual epistemologically stymied because you’re only left with what is quantifiable and empirically demonstrable. Because philosophy is dependent on terminological exactitude and definitional clarity, by eliminating philosophy it allows them to play fast and loose with the terms they invoke such as evolution. They invoke these terms with a great deal of interpretive elasticity. Without terminological exactitude, they invoke this esoteric vernacular that can mean whatever happens to be advantageous to them, the masters of the Anglosphere or Anglo-American empire whose operating system or doctrine is Darwinism, materialism."-- Phillip/Paul Collins

 Despite the fact that bullying is decreasing, the most powerful sectors of our society are bullying us into accepting a prescribed orthodoxy--by using the buzzwords of identity politics to trump both clear thinking and civic disagreement--in this case, muddling gender, claiming it is mutable, irrelevant, and strictly a social construct. We are being bullied into accepting state-approved views of sexuality with sweeping new statewide antibullying regimes that bully because using classic indoctrination techniques to pressure children into adopting the curriculum designers' attitudes and beliefs is bullying. Any differentiation in value between behavior or attitudes from this orthodoxy is considered bigoted and strictly prohibited. Moreover, by pushing extreme gender ideological agendas on the masses, they're not only failing to adequately address the real issue of LGBTQ rights in employment, housing, healthcare, government services, and the military, they're playing divide and conquer games.

The bottom line is that gender identity issues that promote philosophical postulates "Cogito, ergo sum" are best left to, well, philosophy, not science because there is more than enough scientific evidence that proves biological sex is a scientific reality.

“...the central issue is not to determine whether one says yes or no to sex…but to account for the fact that it is spoken about, to discover who does the speaking, the positions and viewpoints from which they speak, the institutions which prompt people to speak about it...

...one had to speak of it [sexuality] as of a thing to be not simply condemned or tolerated but managed, inserted into systems of utility, regulated for the "greater good" of society. Sex was not something one simply judged; it was a thing one administered."

“We must not think that by saying yes to sex, one says no to power; on the contrary, one tracks along the course laid out by the general deployment of sexuality”-- Michel Focault   (emphasis mine)

I know I have not fully answered, why, as Michel Foucault asserts, campaigns are whipped up by the ruling class and its middle-class allies to impose family structures and values, [or lack thereof,] upon the masses," as that would require, at the very least, a book that fully explores all of the reasons, but to put it very simply: destruction of God + destruction of family + destruction of objective reality including a total rewrite of the biosphere (HG Well wrote of the complete control of all biological forms of life) = personal and state power-motive to arbitrarily define and or create "reality" without any regard for Truth.

Links/Sources:

It’s dangerous and wrong to tell all children they’re ‘gender fluid’

Legalised lying and gender engineering. This is conservative?

Cultural homogenization

The real agenda behind antibullying campaign

Why is the political class is obsessed by gender issues?

The Philosophical Contradictions of the Transgender Worldview

When Harry Became Sally

New Israeli Research Reveals that Men Are Men and Women Are Women

“The researchers also found that biological sex also plays a role in preventing specific illnesses. For example, some genes expressed only in the left ventricle of the heart in women work to protect their hearts from disease until the women reach menopause. Another gene, in the liver, processes drugs differently according to the gender.

6,500 genes biased toward one sex or the other

“6,500 genes with activity that was biased toward one sex or the other in at least one tissue, adding to the already major biological differences between men and women.’

'Language Is So Important': Non-Binary/Trans Listener Weighs In On 'Theyby' Discussion

Read more...

Immersed In an Ocean of Electromagnetic Radiation

We can't turn on the TV/radio, open a newspaper/magazine/book without being bombarded by warnings about anthropomorphic global warming/climate change (by the way, a multi-billion dollar industry based on psuedoscience), yet we hear nothing about the very real danger of anthropomorphic electrosmog. The earth is completely smothered in man-made electromagnetic radiation.

“The pulse of the earth 7.83 Hz. The human alpha waves of the human brain is 7.83 Hz. That's not a coincidence, but the power grid, crisscrossing the country, radio, TV, satellite, pagers, cell phone,wireless networking, etc., surrounding us have almost totally permeated our environment with an invisible electromagnetic attack practically impossible to escape.

In the mid eighties fewer than 3% of all people in most of the countries were using cell phones, but if you fast forward to today almost 100% of the people are using cell phones so the question we should all be asking, "is there anyone protecting the public from the invisible ocean of microwave radiation generated from the trillion dollar telecommunications industry?" The answer is a resounding NO!

Brushing aside smart meters, Wifi, and other forms of electromagnetic radiation, the most popular gadget of our age--the cell phone-- has now been shown to damage DNA, break down the brain's defenses, reduce sperm count, increase memory loss, and dramatically increase the risk of Alzheimer's disease and cancer. The growing brains of children make them especially vulnerable, yet half of the world's four billion cell phone users are under twenty.

So, with the constant smog of man-made frequencies surrounding our daily lives and no testing as to its safety, is it any wonder people's bodies have started to react?"

“Measuring Schumann resonance in or around a city has become impossible. Electromagnetic pollution from cell phones has forced us to make our measurements at sea. – Dr. Wolfgang Ludwig, physicist

Links:

Disconnect: The Truth About Cell Phone Radiation, What the Industry Has Done to Hide It, and How to Protect Your Family by Devra Davis

“Davis, the founding director of the toxicology and environmental studies board at the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, takes listeners through the dark side of this trillion-dollar industry. Health experts have long been frozen out of policy-making decisions about cell phones; federal regulatory standards are set by the cell phone industry itself. Cell phone manufacturers have borrowed the playbook of the tobacco industry. One secret memo reveals their war plan against reports of cell phone dangers. Among a host of fascinating characters, Davis introduces Om P. Gandhi, a world expert on how cell phone radiation penetrates the human brain. Once a consultant to major cell phone companies, Gandhi now refuses to work with them. We also meet Franz Adlkofer, who led the multi-lab study that showed once and for all that brain cell DNA is unraveled by cell phone microwave radiation-and, as Davis dramatically portrays, it nearly cost him his career. As this eye-opening call to action shows, we can make safer cell phones now. Why would we put our children at risk of a devastating epidemic of brain illness in the years to come?

Read more...

Is Mainstream Science a Religion?

Why Mainstream Science is a Religion

“Mainstream science, despite all its claims of objectivity, and despite the fact it attempts to lay claim to the truth, is itself a religion. Science places itself on a pedestal and assures everyone it has dispassionately arrived at its conclusions. Meanwhile, however, it is full of assumptions, denials and limitations, and makes the serious mistake of presenting its theories as facts. The errors of mainstream science are gladly seized upon by technocrats, eager to use science and technology to further their own ambitions of control, and include forcing the vaccine, GMO, surveillance, man made global warming, geoengineering, SMART and micro-chipping agendas onto an unsuspecting public. The planned New World Order has a massive technocratic aspect. Materialism, the driving force behind mainstream science, has been shown again and again to lack the capacity to explain the world around us, especially in relation to idealism or other theories that account for the energetic nature of reality. Yet, despite this, we remain collectively bedazzled by materialism, because science is a religion that has induced a certain faith in us. Up until recently, it has still been difficult for society at large to accept the fact that the unseen energetic realms are more powerful and more primal than the material realms we can see and touch … but that is starting to change.

This is certainly not the first time we have struggled with the debate of whether the world can best be described by materialism. The ancient Greek philosophers and scientists thought long and hard about the issue. Materialism vs. idealism is really the philosophical battle between the ideas that matter exists independently (and that consciousness doesn’t exist or is secondary), as opposed to the idea that consciousness, thought and energy are primary (and that matter is secondary). Democritus championed the first viewpoint (and his ideas were taken further by Aristotle), whereas Plato proposed the second with his famous theory of the World of Forms or World of Ideas. According to Plato, our materialist reality is an inferior copy of a more perfect world. This is exactly in alignment with what various cultures, shamans, religions and spiritual traditions have been saying about the preeminence of energy and mind over matter.

Even many distinguished mainstream Western scientists over the last 100+ years have grasped the point that matter is not solid. Here are the very best and brightest of them alluding to the fact that energy is preeminent to matter:

“All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter.” – Max Planck

“If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.” – Nikola Tesla

“The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence.” – Nikola Tesla

“The atoms or elementary particles themselves are not real; they form a world of potentialities or possibilities rather than one of things or facts.” – Werner Heisenberg

“We may therefore regard matter as being constituted by the regions of space in which the field is extremely intense … there is no place in this new kind of physics for the field and matter, for the field is the only reality.” – Albert Einstein

“The field is the sole governing agency of the particle.” – Albert Einstein

“Everything we call real is made of things that cannot be regarded as real.” – Niels Bohr

Plato also wrote that the entire universe can be explained mathematically by numbers. This exactly aligns itself with the idea that we live in a holographic universe – a kind of computer simulation with digital numbers at its foundation.



The Renaissance was heralded as a golden age for humanity, and in many ways it was, but it also further cemented the left-brain materialist view of the world, which can be found in the works of Copernicus, Galileo, Descartes and Newton. Copernicus and Galileo famously proposed heliocentrism over the existing geocentric model, but as the recent rise of the flat earth movement has shown, there is a copious amount of evidence to suggest that the heliocentric theory is far from being complete and foolproof. It was Descartes who famously claimed “I think, therefore I am” and gave birth to the falsehood that thinking, reason and logic is the base of our existence, when in fact being or consciousness is. There is no brain to think without a consciousness that animates it.

Newton, for all the great work he did for physics, came up with a set of abstract, mathematically-based, mechanical formulae which he called “the laws of nature”. Though he was to live several centuries after Newton, genius inventor and true scientist Nikola Tesla made a very telling comment regarding the tendency of mainstream science and scientists to get stuck in a rut with their abstract mathematical theories. This statement could most definitely be applied to Einstein, who despite his brilliance in proposing the theory of relativity, worked for 3+ decades afterwards and could never come up with a more complete theory. Tesla said:

“Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.”

Darwinian Eugenics and Evolution

Charles Darwin, for those of you who didn’t know, was part of an elite family who favored eugenics, and it is not surprising that his theory of evolution emphasized dog-eat-dog competitiveness, survival of the fittest and might is right – all habits and values of the psychopathic ruling class. Those who insist that the idea that “science is a religion” is false may be hard-pressed to explain why someone like Darwin chose to focus on those elements of Nature in this theory, instead of focusing on the incredible symbiosis and cooperation which are also widespread in Nature – and to a greater extent than competition.

Fast forward to today, and it seems science is a religion like never before. What’s happening at CERN with the Hadron Collider’s search for ever smaller and smaller particles seems like materialistic mainstream science desperately trying to justify itself and its outmoded theory, like a dog forever chasing its tail in vain. Recently in November 2014 Dr. Brian Whitworth published a paper which contrasted the materialistic and idealistic views, which he framed as physical realism and quantum realism. When he matched them to data, he found the quantum realism (simulation) model fit the observations and facts much better. He writes:

“The Higgs boson is the virtual particle created by an invisible field to explain another virtual particle created by another invisible field to explain an actual effect (neutron decay). Given dark energy and dark matter, it explains at best 4% of the mass of the universe, but the standard model needs it, so when after fifty years CERN found a million, million, million, millionth of a second signal in the possible range, physics was relieved. There is no evidence this “particle” has any effect on mass at all, but the standard model survives.

By piling fields upon fields, the standard model now has at least 48 point particles, 24 fitted properties, 5 overlapping invisible fields and 14 virtual particles that pop in and out of existence on demand, anywhere, anytime. And it isn’t finished yet, as each new effect needs a new field, e.g. inflation needs an inflaton field. If this approach, founded on physical realism, is preferred, it isn’t because of its simplicity, as it is hard to imagine anything more complicated! Chapter 4 suggests that while the fitted calculations work, their interpretation is a mythology on a scale not seen since Ptolemy’s epicycles.”

Materialism places so much stock in what we can apprehend with our 5 senses, especially sight, since it is the dominant sense for most people. Yet, of what we know exists in the full electromagnetic spectrum, we can only see a tiny range from approximately 700 nanometers (abbreviated nm) to 400 nm, between the infrared and ultraviolet rays. According to this short video clip, if the electromagnetic spectrum were a reel of film 2500 miles long (stretching from California to Alaska), then the band of visible light would be around 1 inch! According to my calculations, if these numbers are correct, that means that we only perceive 0.00000000631313% of what is really there. So why does mainstream science place so much faith in our 5-sense reality and disregard the unseen as fantasy or imagination, when we are so blind?
fraudulent-scientific-research

The fraudulent scientific research of Big Pharma is rife, and has been acknowledged as untrustable by medical journal editors, professors, doctors, government officials and former Big Pharma insiders.

Mainstream Science – Bogged Down by Fraud and Fakery

So far, I have discussed the reasons why mainstream science is ideologically or theoretically on the wrong track. I haven’t even begun to touch the ways in which science is horribly misguided and mistaken on a practical level. Sad to say, science has been totally corrupted by special interests who fund and determine the outcome of much of the research. They can pay for whatever “scientific result” they want for their agenda, not only because one’s very act of observation determines one’s reality, but also because they can slant, distort and omit data in line with their goals. Simply put, a scientist discovering the “wrong” result will be quickly rejected and defunded.

This fake and fraudulent science, which is not true science at all but rather corporate junk science which passes under the rubric of science, is all pervasive. See my articles The Massive Flaw with the Scientific Hierarchy of Evidence, The Top 10 Tricks Used by Corporate Junk Science and Most Scientific Research of Western Medicine Untrustable & Fraudulent, Say Insiders and Experts for a fuller discussion of this point. As Marcia Angell, former editor-in-chief of the esteemed New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), had to say about the pervasive fraudulent scientific research:

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines … I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.”

Happily, there are many true scientists standing outside of the fakery and putting forth alternative evidence to consider (e.g. with the political manmade global warming agenda). The truth cannot be hidden forever.

Mainstream scientists will probably feel aghast to hear it, but the truth is that science is a religion with its own high priests – they just wear white coats rather than black gowns. It requires belief (faith) in its theories (doctrine) which can never ultimately be proven (Evolution, Relativity, Big Bang) because they are full of assumptions and contradictions. There is always at least one question that can never be answered, and constantly redefining terms, omitting numbers or inventing new factors becomes, at a certain point, like twisting facts to suit theories, rather than twisting theories to suit facts, as the fictional character Sherlock Holmes liked to say.

Terrence McKenna humorously put it like this:

“Modern science is based on the principle: ‘Give us one free miracle, and we’ll explain the rest.’ The one free miracle is the appearance of all the mass and energy in the universe and all the laws that govern it in a single instant from nothing.”

Materialist science has tried to convince us that everything can be explained with solid atoms, but as various experiments have proven, only theories which account for consciousness, energy, non-locality and other phenomena make sense. Particles are probability distributions, not little hard things. Materialism falls short again and again in describing and predicting our world. We actually live in a holographic universe – a computer simulation which looks and feels real but which is composed of stuff which is not solid.

Mainstream materialistic science is a religion – and the time is long overdue to give up the faith.

Read more...

The Ultimate Deception: Scientism Exposed

Is the ultimate agenda to take God out of everything? Counterfeit the creation through science? All signs point to exactly that.

Many Christians today are taught to compromise Biblical Scripture with the ever-changing theories of what's claimed to be "science." But is it really science? Because true science is simply the scientific method or empirical data. It is a method of inquiry and the knowledge acquired by that method. The scientific method involves hypothesizing, experimenting, observing and drawing conclusions.

Central to the method of science is that no theory is ever considered final. All theories are subject to scrutiny and reexamination, and it is assumed that all will eventually be proven false by a more comprehensive theory. Yet try to question Evolution, Relativity, Big Bang, the heliocentric universe, gravity, dark matter, dark energy, black holes, etc., and you will be mocked, called names, and/or ignored for your stupidity and utter ignorance, no matter how much real evidence you provide, or how well articulated your argument is.

What is commonly called science these days is actually religion of the world. Full of fabrication and anti-God agenda. The failing of science is not about the scientific method; it is about a largely unrecognized epistemology that developed as a result of the successes of "science". This faulty epistemology can be called scientism, and we should make a sharp distinction between science and scientism.

However, in order to accomplish such a feat, they, the global elite, must systematically create an entire paradigm/”reality” without God, that is anti-Christian, anti biblical, and that dehumanizes, and discredits that you are special, loved, uniquely made in the image of an all-loving, all powerful God. Is it possible that this deception started long ago, maybe even as far back as Pythagoras?



Again, science is nothing more that metaphysics if we simply proclaim it true without confirmation. Science requires repeated confirmation by testing predictions. A clever theory does not solve a problem if it can't confirm the prediction. Where is the confirming example?

"It’s when we allow the world to provide the lens through which we look, that we lose our 'deception perception'."

“Let no man deceive himself. If any man from you seemeth to be wise in the world, let him become a fool that he may be wise For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, he taketh the wise in their own craftiness. And again, the Lord knoweth the thoughts of the wise, that they are vain. Therefore let no man glory in men” 1Corinthians 3:18-21

Read more...

Talk About False Advertising: Just Say No to no!no!

While the FDA is busy attacking legitimate companies like Blue Diamond for making truthful claims about walnuts, based on hard science, companies like PhotoMedex-Radiancy [PHMD], manufacturer of no!no! Hair Removal System engages in an extraordinarily heavy campaign of national television and Internet advertising to promote the sale of this product, making false claims, supposedly supported by science and research in order to rob decent people of their time and money.

“As Radiancy documents submitted in court show, Radiancy deliberately engaged in a massive advertising campaign based on bogus claims lacking any scientific basis, including knowingly false claims that the no!no! "provides an effect similar to what lasers accomplish in the dermatologist office"; produces "laser-like results"; is "like laser and IPL [intense pulsed light] treatments, the heat gradually disrupts the hair growth cycle." Mimicking medical laser claims, Radiancy claimed that the no!no! Hair provided "up to 94% reduction in hair re-growth", allowed users to "get rid of unwanted hair and keep it gone" and "have a life of freedom from hair." As Radiancy admitted in papers filed with the court shortly before the settlement, it has dropped all such claims as a result of Tria's lawsuit.

In these hard-to-avoid infomercials, the aforementioned company declares that no!no! not only slows down hair regrowth, it actually helps keep it from growing back. It asserts that the use of their product results in “up to 94% less hair regrowth with no pain, no mess, no stress,” when it's an outright lie. Not only that, according to thousands of customer complaints, they refuse to honor their 60-day return policy unless the customer has the wherewithal to devote all of their time and effort to the refund, or the customer threatens with legal action.

Now, the manufacturer has not submitted these so-called "studies" about the use and efficacy of its product to the FDA and despite the fact that these blatantly unsupported claims are designed to mislead and deceive consumers into buying this expensive and ineffective, and even potentially dangerous product, the FDA ignores them.

In fact, a blinded, controlled, prospective clinical study by the Department of Ophthalmology, Dermatology, Otolaryngology, out of Vanderbilt University Medical Center, found that the no!no! Hair Removal System is no more effective than shaving with a razor.

“CONCLUSIONS: Relative to shaving, the hot-wire (no!no!) device does not produce lessened hair density, decreased hair re-growth rate, greater duration of effect, nor induce changes in hair thickness and color. We conclude that the hot-wire device does not offer any benefit as compared to shaving.

Read more...

Predators in Your Backyard

Across the world scientists are releasing predators, nature’s ultimate killers, close to where people live. In Florida, a new population of panthers, feared as ambush predators, have been released near to the busy town of Naples. In the Italian Alps, bears have been reintroduced after they became virtually extinct, and now try to get into people’s homes in the middle of the night. And in Yellowstone National Park, wolves have been brought back 70 years after they were exterminated.

Horizon meets the scientists behind this radical scheme, and the people who now have to share their backyards with these dangerous predators.

Read more...

Scientism and the Militant Atheist: The Masked Religion of this Age.

It's no secret that the Christian religion has been--and continues to be--responsible for much human suffering throughout history; however, what is not so broadly publicized, therefore, overlooked by many, including Atheists, themselves, is the human suffering brought about--albeit, more recent history-- by another form of religion: Atheism (see video below)--not to be confused with Agnosticism, the view that the existence or non-existence of any deity is unknown and possibly unknowable--which claims to be anti-religious, despite it's passionate belief system.  I mean, one must ask why was the bloodiest century in history, the most secular century in human history?    That is, of course, the 20th century.

Of course, Atheists, like Richard Dawkins, argue that it wasn't militant atheism that was responsible for so much death and destruction; it was the result of communist leaders such as Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and Ceausescu, etc. Yet, the enforcement of atheism was a critical requirement for the success of communism, and thus it had to be implemented at all costs. Not to mention, if you're going to argue that millions were killed due to the insanity of a few men, the same argument could be used for all of the human suffering caused by Christianity. An even viscous leader like Hitler only feigned Christian belief, until it was no longer necessary. Hitler's acceptance of the ideas of Nietzsche and Darwin shaped his ideology and allowed him to justify his atrocities in the minds of Nazis and their supporters. In other words, his initial identification with Christianity was strictly a utilitarian move. The same might even hold true for Constantine the Great, well known for being the first Roman emperor to be converted to Christianity, the question remaining, "was his conversion, authentic, or purely political?” Moreover, conversion to Christianity had to be understood in the context of that time. Many early Christians were still polytheists, including Constantine, accepting a Christian God together with their old gods, and that Constantine was seen as a god, and saw himself as a god, and people revered gods not because they were gods, but because gods were "useful". In other words, it's more complex than the black and white issue portrayed.

“The crimes of atheism have generally been perpetrated through a hubristic ideology that sees man, not God, as the creator of values. Using the latest techniques of science and technology, man seeks to displace God and create a secular utopia here on earth. Of course if some people - the Jews, the landowners, the unfit, or the handicapped - have to be eliminated in order to achieve this utopia, this is a price the atheist tyrants and their apologists have shown themselves quite willing to pay. Thus they confirm the truth of Fyodor Dostoyevsky's dictum, "If God is not, everything is permitted." -- Dinesh D'Souza

Like many religious people, there are many atheists who want the world to believe as they do, that all life is an unintended consequence of coincidence, that life exists by mere chance.  This belief  is unsupported by scientific fact, thus, 100% faith based.  Therefore, militant atheism is the orthodox rejection of intelligence in the creation of life, and in physical reality.  Science, or some would say pseudo-science, is their god, because there is no scientific proof that life evolved from nothing, by chance.  Skeptics who advocate a materialistic or atheistic viewpoint can be just as militantly intolerant, authoritarian, and dangerous to society, as any fundamentalist religious zealot of any persuasion.

Some might say, yeah but, unlike Christianity, atheism lacks the organization necessary to exert any kind of influence or power.  Well, on the surface, that might seem to be true, but dig a little deeper and you will find a very well organized group of people, whose arsenal of persuasion and strategic influence is that much stronger due to its apparent non-existence.

On the surface, this might sound preposterous.  How could a few people do battle against the power and wealth of the Christian church?  Well, besides infiltrating the Church and the schools dating back to at least the 1950s, which senate hearing testimony proves,  today, advances in information technology and the proliferation of electronic media have, more or less, leveled the playing field between these two "religions" in the "war of ideas" After all, critics of Darwinian evolution-- Atheist doctrine--are labeled raving lunatics, fundamentalist Creationists or Right-wing zealots, despite the fact that Darwin's theory is based on post-hoc explanation. In fact, the addition of extraneous hypotheses to a theory to save it from being falsified is what saves the Big Bang theory from complete abandonment. Without the creation of black holes, dark matter, dark energy, the Big Bang theory would've died out long ago. Yet, this is what the public schools and mainstream media promote and teach.

The League of Militant Atheists or Goddless was the organization founded by the Bolshevik's regime in 1925 to spearhead its efforts to promote atheism and he presents the League's propaganda, activities, and personnel at both the central and the provincial levels.  Although this organization no longer officially exists, its ideological  followers are very influential and powerful in mainstream academia, and to a large extent control the public's understanding of  science through suppression of alternative theories, and censorship in the name of science dogma. Countless numbers of scientists have paid a heavy price for the heresy of opposing orthodox interpretations of the cosmos, of how life began...for going against the established paradigms, such as the "Big Bang" theory, and/or the doctrine of Darwinian evolution...

Take TED Talk, a nonprofit supposedly devoted to "Ideas Worth Spreading", and its recent censorship of Rodger Sheldrake and Graham Hancock because a few militant atheists declared that they were spreading pseudoscience. Not only that, they admit to having a number of dedicated activists working on the most popular online encyclopedic resource, Wikipedia--that advertises itself as a the democratic information editing platform--amongst other popular platforms of information dissemination that aren't always what they seem.  They admitted to it in The Skeptical Inquirer. , one of their publications as well as its British counterpart, the Skeptic.

Don't get me wrong. It's not that atheists aren't entitled to the same rights to free speech as everyone else.  Of course they are.  What I find objectionable is their intellectual conceit...that thay actually think they aren't involved in a religion, and their insidious effort to censor and suppress on the grounds that it denies scientific evidence, especially when they know these resources are used by the majority of young and non-skeptical readers.

Today, everyone has been indoctrinated taught to believe that enlightened modern man's knowledge is based on objective science and dispassionate secular reasoning, freed from religious superstitions.  But true science does not affirm nor reject any theory out of hand, but, instead, first carefully, and impartially, examines all available evidence before jumping to conclusion.  True science does not suppress or censor  dissenting viewpoints and voices.

That said, the establishment paradigm has conquered the physical sciences of astronomy, physics and biology, and has dug its heels in universities and lower schools everywhere. Questioning and/or non-acceptance of these paradigms is equivalent to career death for scientists.  So, it appears mainstream science is merely a veneer that masks a very powerful religion.

Martyred in the USSR is a documentary about militant atheism in the former Soviet Union. It tells the personal, emotional and horrific story of what people went through simply because they chose to cling to their faith, even at the risk of death. It did not matter what religion you practiced, if you believed in God in the USSR you were persecuted, and persecuted brutally. From 1917 to 1990 people of faith were shot, executed, thrown in the gulag and left to die because the Soviet Government hated religion. What makes this story extremely important is that the new generation in Russia knows nothing about their past and will deny that the brutality ever happened.

Read more...

Is The Island of Dr. Moreau a Reality?

In 1896, H. G. Wells wrote the novel, The Island of Dr. Moreau about a shipwrecked man rescued by a passing boat who is left on the island home of Doctor Moreau, who creates sentient beings from animals via vivisection. 100 years later it was made into a movie. 10 years later, it's become a reality.  This man obviously possessed an amazing sense of things to come, because almost 120 years later, it is certain that the island in Wells imagination, if it doesn't exist already, will exist in the near future.

In 2009, reuters asked the following questions in an article entitled, Scientists want debate on animals with human genes.

"A mouse that can speak? A monkey with Down's Syndrome? Dogs with human hands or feet? British scientists want to know if such experiments are acceptable, or if they go too far in the name of medical research.

Two years later, The Academy of Medical Sciences is calling for an international regulatory commission to oversee the creations they call Animals Containing Human Material (ACHM). Included within the ACHM classification are non-human primates (NHP). In other words, human-hybrids.

This report claims that "such approaches are long established" and that "thousands of different ACHM been used in biomedical research."  Furthermore, they claim, ACHM are used to study human biological functions or disease that cannot be accurately modeled; where experiments using humans are considered infeasible or considered unethical; and where modification of an animal's body makes it more closely represent that of a human."  The report concludes that the majority of ACHM research does not pose ethical or regulatory difficulties, but identifies 3 areas that will need careful oversight in future:

• Modification of an animal’s brain which might lead to human-like cognition;
• Changing an animal so it has human appearance or characteristics (e.g. skin, facial or limb features, speech); and the
• Development of human-derived sperm or eggs in an animal (especially if fertilization may occur).

The day after this study was published,  the Daily Mail reported on two of the tens of thousands of laboratories around the world conducting these types of experiments in secret.

"Scientists in British labs have created over 150 human-animal hybrid embryos in the past three years, which has caused concern that led to a call for major oversight from the Academy of Medical Sciences over animals containing human materials (ACHM).

Justifying these experiments with "cures for everything" is at the very least, disingenuous, when not only hasn't there been cures for anything in the last century, the rate of disease has increased 4000%. More than likely, the reason has much more to do with engineering the super soldier.

DARPA has millions of dollars allocated toward editing the DNA of our soldiers on the battlefield. From Darpa’s Lab-Grown Blood to turning humans into batteries to bullet-proof skin created using "goat's milk packed with spider-silk proteins, according to news reports. Their hope is that they can eventually replace the keratin in human skin -- which makes it tough -- with the spider-silk proteins."  Well, it just so happens that scientists are discovering a plausible explanation for the clinical and microscopic findings in Morgellons disease is connected to the hyper production of keratin.  Could it be that Morgellons is the result of the pentagon's endeavor to make human skin bullet-proof? Can you imagine what will happen should they re-engineer human skin  using genes from goats and spiders?  Why not? In 2010, DARPA invested over $6 million in order to create “synthetic organisms” that can live forever — or can be killed with the flick of a molecular switch.

From Timenolonger:

Julian Huxley, brother of Aldous who authored Brave New World, first used this word: Transhumanism. Huxley was a member of the British Eugenics Society, eugenics being the foundation of Transhumanism.

Eugenics is a science dedicated to a Darwinist philosophy applied to humanity, that the strong should thrive and evolve, while the weak are culled and eradicated.

Eugenics rests on a necessity of there being superior and inferior genetic pools in the human population. It might be very socially unacceptable to speak publicly of there being some races, ethnic or cultural groups who are inferior to the rest, yet in secrecy this is exactly what elite Eugenicists believe.

The public is guided to love the idea of Transhumanism by being persuaded that it is not a goal attached to race or ethnicity, but simply a means of bettering all of humanity. This is quite untrue.

Elite Transhumanists have no desire to “evolve” all humankind, their goal is one which seeks to advance only their own bloodlines and to leave the rest in disadvantage to them so that these unfortunate ones have no choice but to become their slaves, their lab animals and their labor force.

“The lowest strata are reproducing too fast. Therefore… they must not have too easy access to relief or hospital treatment lest the removal of the last check on natural selection should make it too easy for children to be produced or to survive; long unemployment should be a ground for sterilisation.” - Julian Huxley

The elite, as they are wrongly called, are blood relations of one another, descending from the hybrid tyrants who ruled in result of this same Transhumanist philosophy pre-flood.

Read more...

New Scientific Study Provides Evidence That Morgellons Is a Physical Illness

Contrary to what so many medical practitioners claim, the controversial illness, Morgellons Disease (MD) does, indeed, have a physiological basis, according to a new research report, "Morgellons Disease: A Chemical and Light Microscopic Study,” published in the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dermatology Research.

Characteristics of MD commonly described in the medical literature, include: insidious onset, dermatological signs and systemic symptoms, lack of response to immunosuppressive treatment and serological and clinical evidence linking this phenomenon with tickborne diseases such as Lyme borreliosis.

Patients with MD experience symptoms including fatigue, cognitive disability (described as “brain fog”), Fibromyalgia, joint pain, vision decline, neurological disorders, hair loss, disintegration of teeth, intermittent fever, low body temperature, sleep disturbances, reduced exercise capacity, peripheral neuropathy, delayed capillary refill, abnormal Romberg’s sign, decreased body temperature, cardiac arrhythmias, and tachycardia, and many patients with MD report inability or impaired ability to work.

For the first time, this study showed that MD filaments contain keratin (fibrous structural proteins, and the key of structural material making up the outer layer of human skin). "These observations suggest that hyperkeratosis and keratin filament production associated with spirochetal infection is a plausible explanation for the clinical and microscopic findings in MD."

Links:

Filament formation associated with spirochetal infection: a comparative approach to Morgellons disease

Read more...

Post Humanity: Unlimited Supply of Humans in Labs.

Scientists will soon be able to create an unlimited supply of humans in the lab.  We already know stem cells can differentiate into any cell, potentially replacing neurons, islet cells, kidney cells and more. However, now, lab-grown egg cells could revolutionize fertility - and even banish menopause. That's right. The The first human egg cells that have been grown entirely in the laboratory from stem cells could be fertilized later this year.

The first human eggs grown from human stem cells could be fertilized with human sperm cells later this year, potentially adding one more peg in the ladder toward reproduction sans human interaction. In this case it would entirely bypass a woman's donation of her eggs. But it could also turn stem cells into an infinite loop, of egg cells into embryos into stem cells, and on and on, in a fractal-like repetition of reproduction.

So, that means they are going to create a human being, right? Okay, for some, a zygote, or embryo. What will they do with this "being" after they create it? Well, I believe the plan is to either freeze it or destroy it. And for what? Menopause is part of the natural cycle. Women cannot have children after a certain age, and for good reason.

Read more...

Darwinism: A Theory to Justify the Exploitative Crimes of the Ruling Class?

Believe it or not, The Origins of Species By Means of Natural Selection or Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, by Charles Darwin was not the first time a proposal for the diversity of life included an evolutionary explanation. In fact, evolutionary concepts about life date as far back as 5,000 years ago. 

According to the 4,000 year old Babylonian text, Enuma-Elish, life first appeared spontaneously in water and then evolved  one species from one another. Many years later, the myth of evolution found fertile ground in  Ancient Greece. Some Greek philosophers, calling themselves "materialists", accepted only the existence of matter and counted matter as the original source of life. Consequently, they resorted to the myth of evolution, inherited from the Sumerians, to explain how living beings came into existence.

Much later, in 1803, Jean Baptiste Lamarck gave a detailed account of the theory of evolution. From there, in 1859, Darwin published his theory of evolution which is basically a more detailed account of the Sumerian myth. Nevertheless, his theory gained political momentum because it provided a "scientific" basis for the ruling class to this very day.

The fossil record revealed that things did not under go an evolutionary process from primitive to the complex. Even things that lived hundreds of millions of years ago possessed the same complex structure of their counterparts living today.  There was no trace of transitional forms that Darwin assumed to have existed, and were supposed to link one species to another. Biochemistry revealed that life was too complex to have emerged by chance.

According to Michael Behe, author of Darwin's Black Box:

"Highly sophisticated molecular machines control every molecular process. Thus the details of life are finely calibrated and the machinery of life enormously complex... The simplest self-sufficient cell has the capacity to produce thousands of different proteins and other molecules…synthesis, degradation, energy generation, replication, maintenance of cell architecture mobility, regulation, repair, communication…All of these functions take place in virtually every cell, and each function itself requires the interaction of numerous parts.”
[...]
A child can die because of a single defect in one of the many machines needed for taking protein to the lysosome. A single flaw in the cell’s… protein transport pathway is fatal. Unless the entire system were immediately in place, our ancestors would have died. Attempts at a gradual evolution are a recipe for extinction”.

In 1871, Darwin went on to write The Descent of Man, claiming man evolved from apes without evidence to back it up. Moreover, he claimed certain races of human beings - Caucasians - were more evolved than others, suggesting further, that the less evolved races would eventually be totally annihilated.  After all, life was based on a bloody struggle between the weak and the strong.

The Piltdown Man Fake: The Greatest Forgery of the 20th Century

In 1912, Charles Dawson discovered Eoanthropus dawsoni, the "Piltdown man" giving credence to Darwin’s theory of evolution. Of Dawson's discoveries, 38 were found to be fakes.  In 1953, a scientist named Kenneth Oakley examined the Piltdown man and discovered the jaw of an ape had been attached to a human skull.  One of his partners was none other than Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, who in turn, really pushed evolution on the Catholic Church.  Teilhard would go on to work in China and take part in the Peking man discovery, a collection of would be missing links – 175 fossil fragments - that mysteriously disappeared in 1941 before anyone could fully examine them.

Darwin's theory provided the foundation for a ruthless ideology (Communism, Nazism), that humanity could be exalted through struggle and violence, to leaders and thinkers, such as Hitler, Mussolini, Mao Tse Tung, Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin.

Engels, after finishing Darwin's book, wrote to Marx: "Darwin, whom I am just now reading is splendid." In response, Marx replied: "This is the book which contains the basis in natural history for our view."

In a nut shell, Darwin's theory lacking a scientific basis has generated nothing more than a dark legacy to humanity.

Read more...

Technotronic Society: Living to 1,000 Years Old and Technological Feudalism.

The "technetronic" society - "a society that is shaped culturally, psychologically, socially, and economically by the impact of technology and electronics—particularly in the area of computers and communications." that Zbigniew Brzezinski predicted in his book, Between Two Ages : America's Role in the Technetronic Era is here.  In this book, he argued that in order to prevent global instability from emerging from economic equality, developed nations would have to come together to coordinate policy.  In other words, a new world order.

It's interesting to note that two years prior to writing the book, "Between Two Ages", Brzezinski wrote an article called "America in the Technetronic Age" for the CIA-funded publication , "Encounter Magazine" which is no longer published, of which he wrote:.

"At the same time, the capacity to assert social and political control over the individual will vastly increase. As I have already noted, it will soon be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and to maintain up-to-date, complete files, containing even most personal information about the health or personal behaviour of the citizen, in addition to more customary data.

These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities. This will encourage tendencies through the next several decades toward a technotronic era, a dictatorship, leaving even less room for political procedures as we know them.

Finally, looking ahead to the end of the century, the possibility of biochemical mind control and genetic tinkering with man, including beings which will function like men and reason like them as well, could give rise to some difficult questions". - Zbigniew Brzezinski, "America in the Technetronic Age" The Encounter. January, 1968

There is no doubt that humanity is on the cusp of developing the capacity to transcend itself, creating a superior life-form that will transcend human limits. This, hands down, is the biggest challenge to society in this new age...actually,  in the history of humankind, this potential ability to transform man into Nietzsche's "Overman" (Übermensch), essentially, god-men.

According to gerontologist Aubrey de Grey the person who lives to be 1,000 years-old has already been born. This should raise the question, who gets to live to be 1,000-years old? Because, surely, this only applies to those who can afford to live that long. We can't even deal with the extended life span of baby boomers, most of which will not even make it to 100 years!  Not to mention, our current materialistic value system, where, as Martin Luther King said, "machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people", makes the likelihood of an extension of even 50 years very problematic for the 99%.

The exploitative transnational elites.

And unfortunately, from what we've seen thus far, the maxim, 'power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely, is absolutely true. Not so long ago, the manifestation of this maxim was clearly seen in Nazi Germany, which one can argue, lurks beneath the surface of our current political power structure. Truth be told, a covert system of eugenics and classism is already in place.  Granted, this system cannot be compared to Hitler's system; however, the less money, the less white, the less power and status you have, the less likely it is that you will receive health care,  or have the resources needed to extend your lifespan.   However, now that we're face to face with the prospect of people living 1,000 years, to be sure, the emergence of a bolder, in your face techno-eugenics system of mass control and technological feudalism/classism is all but inevitable. That is, if left in the hands of the exploitative, transnational elites, which, of course, it will be..

In 1958, Aldous Huxley wrote in Brave New World Revisited, “The future dictator’s subjects will be painlessly regimented by a corps of highly trained social engineers.” He quotes an advocate of this new science: "The challenge of social engineering in our time is like the challenge of technical engineering 50-years ago. If the first half of the twentieth century was the era of technical engineers, the second half may well be the era of social engineers." He then went on to say, “The twenty-first century, I suppose, will be the era of World Controllers, the scientific caste system and Brave New World.”

As Brzezinski noted, "in the industrial age, the introduction of the machine was the beginning of utopia; for others it meant the unleashing of evil".  In the technotronic age, the introduction of transhumanism is the beginning of utopia; for the great majority it means the potential unleashing of an evil that most cannot imagine.

"Human life is reduced to real suffering, to hell, only when two ages, two cultures and religions overlap. . . .There are times when a whole generation is caught in this way between two ages, two modes of life, with the consequence that it loses all power to understand itself and has no standard, no security, no simple acquiescence." —Herman Hesse, Steppenwolfe

Related Links:

In An Appraisal of the Technologies of Political Control, author Steve Wright observed that a revolution in military affairs was indeed occurring, and warned that the technology will be used by the security forces of various countries for suppressing internal dissent.

Read more...

Avoiding Global Collapse: The Cyborg Solution

Is the solution to our problems, a machine vision of the world? A self-organizing model, based on an underlying order of nature - that was completely disproved in 1981 - and taken from the cold and logical world of machines, where humans are reduced to mechanistic nodes? Or, has the environmental movement been hijacked by "right winged think tanks" and "cold war technocrats" who were using the balance of nature as a political trick? In other words, is this idea of the "balance of nature", "equilibrium" "web of life" "self-regulating Eco-system" an attempt by the powerful to maintain the status quo?

Read more...

The Death of Humility: Becoming God.

Is there an esoteric agenda that we, the mostly complacent white people (marginalized minorities - especially poor blacks - are already well aware of the diabolical nature of those in charge as they have been their targets for centuries), are helping to forward in absolute ignorance? Could it be that "transhumanism" - a term coined by Julian Huxley, a prominent eugenicist - upon closer inspection, is really a repackaged form of eugenics? After all, both transhumanism and eugenics seek to breed better human beings, and desire to perfect humanity through science.

“Initially, however, the greatest advantages will go to those who have the resources, the skills, and the willingness to learn to use new tools. One can speculate that some technologies may cause social inequalities to widen. For example, if some form of intelligence amplification becomes available, it may at first be so expensive that only the wealthiest can afford it. The same could happen when we learn how to genetically enhance our children. Those who are already well off would become smarter and make even more money. This phenomenon is not new. Rich parents send their kids to better schools and provide them with resources such as personal connections and information technology that may not be available to the less privileged. Such advantages lead to greater earnings later in life and serve to increase social inequalities.”

Scientism, the religion of the future, is the practice of science as religion, and is currently the religion of the elites, whether they admit to it or not. Achieving "godhood" is their ultimate goal and if history has anything to say about it,  this envisioned “technotopia” will be off-limits to the masses.

Read more...

Read more...

Besting God: The Versace Body Design.

Are people becoming obsolete?

"After all the body is an extension of fashion...We will have cyborg bodies. We will have augmented bodies.  We will auto-morph ourselves into whatever vehicle keeps us in existence for the longest period of time with the most pleasure, the least pain, and the most ease, the most elegance ." - Natasha Vita More transhumanist artist in documentary, TechnoCalyps, below

Non – biological intelligence is growing exponentially, while biological intelligence is not growing at all. Does this mean that one day machines will have consciousness? Will rule us?

At the dawn of the third millennium, we face the possibility of fully merging man and machine, radically changing mankind as we know it. Technology is about to take over the torch of history and guide us into a new era with the goal of transcending human limits and creating a more evolved species. This begs the question, what will happen to human beings? Like the Neanderthals, will human beings become a fossil of history? Or, will the new evolved species enslave human beings?

Read more....

Read more...

If Technology is Advancing Exponentially, Why Does Oncology Remain in the Dark Ages?

Cancer's been around forever, it seems, yet very little progress has occured in its treatement. In fact, more people than ever are getting cancer, and, very often, the prescribed treatment: chemotherapy, is more lethal than the disease. Not to mention, the mental anguish, physical suffering, and poor quality of life cancer patients are encouraged to endure by almost every doctor who talk or scare them into undergoing chemotherapy.

So, if technology is advancing exponentially, why does oncology remain in the "dark ages"? Could it be the economics behind chemotherapy? In other words, cancer is big business, and healthy individuals interfere with the profit mechanism that depends on the proliferation of cancer patients. Something as simple and cheap as baking soda and sunshine is a complete anathema to the cancer industry. Promoting baking soda as an alternative treatment for cancer plunders the profits of the parasitic industries who sell themselves as our friends.

On the other hand, what do you have to lose from considering alternatives to this extraordinary costly, and barbaric form of cancer treatment that oncologists push today? Nothing, especially if you consider it before the "industry" gets a chance to wrap its parasitic tentacles around you.

When in doubt, ask yourself, cui bono ("To whose benefit?"). The answer is simple. The unscrupulous powers that work to maintain the status quo of the medical and pharmaceutical industry at any cost, including the lives of millions of people.

Dr. Tullio Simoncini scrapped the current cancer paradigm and started from scratch. His findings show cancer is caused by the progression of a fungus called Candida Albicans. Based on this hypothesis, Dr. Simoncini treats cancer with sodium bicarbonate, the most potent enemy of fungi, and his rate of success is encouraging.







And finally, a man named Vito Johnston, who claimed to have cured stage 4 prostate cancer with Baking Soda Molasses Cancer Protocol Solutions.

Read more...

Are Potential Cancer Cures Being Ignored?

If you visit the following website, Cancer is DEAD: Cancer Killers from A to Z , you will find a vast array of mostly natural substances and compounds (over 90) with cancer fighting properties that most people don't know about, and the scholarly studies behind them. What is most interesting is that most of the studies listed were conducted by our government...some ten years ago!   Whoever compiled this list should be highly commended, as I'm sure it involved a lot of time and hard work. He or she also noted, in so many words, that this compilation is just the tip of the iceberg.

Apoptosis is key:

If you've been diagnosed with cancer:

For best hope, you need to know your specific cell line, and your blood work needs to be focused on common cancer precursors. Doctors don't always do either, as learned first hand. There are potentially hundreds of specific cancer cell lines in any given organ, each of which may have it's own unique dynamics compared to others that may afflict the same organ. For instance, lung cancer is often called either Small Cell or Non-Small Cell, while there are almost 200 known lung cancer cell lines. To best know where to invest your money and efforts in complementary treatments the cell line is key. Once you know your cell line go to Google Scholar and search for: 'cell line' cancer apoptosis. This will bring up virtually every study ever done on your cell line, and then you'll need to go through them trying to spot complimentary foods and compounds that you might acquire on your own.

One reason you should know your cell line is to know whether it is "estrogen positive" or "estrogen negative". Positive means the cancer may be proliferated via estrogen, and negative means it shouldn't be affected by estrogen . This is important because many foods and compounds that are useful to cancer fighting in general may increase estrogen levels and need to be avoided. This all also applies for androgen, but this research didn't seem to find too many foods that affect testosterone levels.

Blood work is important because there are many common blood elements that are often associated with cancer diagnosis. Some examples include copper and melatonin. High copper is often found in cancer patients, and it has been found that cancer cells feed off of copper, which means foods high in copper should be avoided and ideally drugs that strip copper from the body will need to be requested. Low levels of melatonin is common in cancer patients, therefore consuming melatonin supplements should be an ideal complimentary treatment should that be your case.

In addition, Natalie Wolchover reports on the "long road to a cure".

One of Salk's admirers is Evangelos Michelakis, a cancer researcher at the University of Alberta who, three years ago, discovered that a common, nontoxic chemical known as DCA, short for dichloroacetate, seems to inhibit the growth of cancerous tumors in mice. Michelakis' initial findings garnered much fanfare at the time and have recirculated on the Web again this week, in large part because of a blog post ("Scientists cure cancer, but no one takes notice") that ignited fresh debate with people wondering if it was true.

The mechanism by which DCA works in mice is remarkably simple: It killed most types of cancer cells by disrupting the way they metabolize sugar, causing them to self-destruct without adversely affecting normal tissues.

Following the animal trials, Michelakis and his colleagues did tests of DCA on human cancer cells in a Petri dish, then conducted human clinical trials using $1.5 million in privately raised funds. His encouraging results — DCA treatment appeared to extend the lives of four of the five study participants — were published last year in Science Translational Medicine.

The preliminary work in rodents, cell cultures, and small trials on humans points to DCA as being a powerful cancer treatment. That doesn't mean it's the long-awaited cure — many other compounds have seemed similarly promising in the early stages of research without later living up to that promise — but nonetheless, Michelakis believes larger human trials on DCA are warranted.

So, are potential cancer cures being ignored? I think it's safe to say, it is certain.

Read more...

The Ultimate Transhumanism Manifesto

Believe it or not, a very large percentage of the ruling elite imagine an ideal society that will one day resemble a human beehive.  What does that mean?  Basically a scientifically designed slave race that will never rebel. Not coincidentally, the transhumanists coined a popular term, "hive mind", which refers to the giant collective intelligence which will be created when people the world over link their brains together with technology.

"Biometry, for example; Their one aim is to create the new man, the man adapted to technical functions. The creation of the ideal man will soon be a simple technical operation." -- Jaques Ellul, The Technological Society, 1954

Sir Charles Galton Darwin, former president of the British Eugenics Society and author of The Next Million Years, describes five great revolutions throughout human history, the fifth of which had not yet happened. The fifth revolution involved using science to alter human nature itself, possibly creating a race of supermen (post human). He goes on to say that eugenics operations will become a necessity in order to control population growth. He applauds China for its long history of civil services and holds it up as the model civilization for a world that will ultimately be unified through technology. Humans should resemble workers on an ant hill.

"There might be a drug which without other harmful side effects removed the urgency of sexual desire, and so reproduced in humanity, the status of workers in a beehive." -- Sir Charles Galton Darwin

Below, the documentary The Age of Transitions - a phrase coined by Newt Gingrich in 2001 - is about converging technology, transhumanism, artificial intelligence, life extension, brain implants, social science, propaganda, nanotechnology, eugenics, geopolitics, world revolution, much more.

"Those countries that ignore these patterns of change will fall further behind and find themselves weaker, poorer, and more vulnerable than their wiser, more change-oriented neighbors." -- Newt Gingrich

While most of us were reinforcing our own, and other's patriotism, on December 3, 2001,  the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Department of Commerce (DOC) organized a workshop on December 3-4, 2001. (A pre-publication online version of the report incorporating the views expressed at the workshop by leading experts from government, academia, and the private sector)

The title of the report: "Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance - Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science".

The integration and synergy of the four technologies (nano-bio-info-cogno) originate from the nanoscale, where the building blocks of matter are established. This picture symbolizes the confluence of technologies that now offers the promise of improving human lives in many ways, and the realignment of traditional disciplinary boundaries that will be needed to realize this potential. New and more direct pathways towards human goals are envisioned in working habits, in economic activity, and in the humanities.

In the early decades of the twenty-first century, concentrated efforts can unify science based on unity in nature, thereby advancing the combination of nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology, and new humane technologies based in cognitive science. With proper attention to ethical issues and societal needs, converging technologies could determine a tremendous improvement in human abilities, societal outcomes, the nations productivity, and the quality of life. This is a broad, cross-cutting, emerging and timely opportunity of interest to individuals, society and humanity in the long term.

The phrase convergent technologies refers to the synergistic combination of four major NBIC (Nano-Bio-Info-Cogno) provinces of science and technology, each of which is currently progressing at a rapid rate: (a) nanoscience and nanotechnology; (b) biotechnology and biomedicine, including genetic engineering; (c) information technology, including advanced computing and communications; (d) cognitive science, including cognitive neuroscience.

Some of the participants:

White House, Department of Defense, DARPA, National Science Foundation, Department of Commerce, Newt Gingrich, NASA, National Institutes of Health, Hewlet Packard, IBM, Raytheon, Lucent, Stanford University, Sandia National Labs, MIT, Tissue Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, NYU Medical School, University of Calgary, Duke, University of Texas, UCSB, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Carnegie Melon University, University of Virginia, University of Maryland, Institute of Nanotechnology, The EPA…

The idea behind this workshop was to set an agenda for the future; the key goal, "enhancing human performance" (merging human biology with technology) that would lead to "a more efficient societal structure". In other words, making plans to alter human nature itself.

From this elitist gathering, Memetics, was born. Founded on the principles of universal Darwinism, memetics is the study of memes, which is any idea which passes from one person to others eventually becoming a norm throughout society. Memetics would allow a deeper understanding of the collective cognitive processes throughout societies. Applications are oriented toward social Darwinism.

The 2001 report also provides solutions for the war on terror.

Socio-tech can help us win the war on terrorism. It can help us understand the motivations of the terrorists, and so eliminate them. - 2001 report

Since 9/11 a mountain of legislation has been passed including The Patriot Act, The Military Commissions Act, The John Warner Defense Act, and countless others, all which have rendered the term, terrorist, so ambiguous that anyone could be designed a terrorist.

At this point, you could be taken to a prison without charges, without habeus corpus, and with no rights whatsoever. These laws were not written on a whim. They were specifically designed to give the government carte blanch authority over the people during the chaos and confusion of the Age of Transitions.

The Huxley Brothers:

Julian Huxley, grandson of Thomas Henry Huxley (president of the Royal Society and one of the biggest advocates of Darwinism) came up with the term, transhumanism to replace the term, eugenics, after WWII for obvious reasons. Eugenics means good genes and encouraging the best and brightest to breed. Of course, it's the elite who are considered the best and the brightest. Per Francis Galton, it was because, in the struggle for life, they made it to the top of society, hence, the best humanity had to offer.

"The lowest strata are reproducing too fast. Therefore... they must not have too easy access to relief or hospital treatment lest the removal of the last check on natural selection should make it too easy for children to be produced or to survive; long unemployment should be a ground for sterilisation." -- Julian Huxley

On March 20, 1962, Aldous Huxley, author of Brave New World, gave a lecture at UC Berkeley, in which he clearly laid out the vision of this planned future society. He said,

"In the ultimate revolution, where man can act directly on the mind body of his fellows. The nature of the ultimate revolution is precisely this: we're now in the process of developing a whole series of techniques, which will enable the controlling oligarchy, who have always existed and and probably always will, to get people to actually love their servitude. First of all, to standardize the population; to iron out an inconvenient human difference, create mass produced models of human beings arranged in some kind of scientific caste system..."

Links:

Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance NANOTECHNOLOGY, BIOTECHNOLOGY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCE

The Physics of Collective Consciousness

Read more...

Evidence of Chain Reaction at Fukushima Unit 1.

Recent press reports have discussed the possibility that Fukushima Unit 1 may be having a nuclear chain reaction. Neutron bursts were detected 13 times, about a mile away from the reactor, as well as the presence of an “ethereal blue flash,” above the plant. Moreover, new data released by TEPCO indicates that even though Fukushima Unit 1 was shut down during the March 11 earthquake, it appears to have "gone critical" again.

In the video below, Arnie Gundersen, Chief Nuclear Engineer from Fairewinds Energy Associates, explains that the presence of neutrons inside a nuclear reactor means that a chain reaction is definitely occurring.  The discovery of isotope Chlorine-38, not present in nature, in Fukushima #1 reactor,  is more than likely, created by Chlorine-37, present in seawater, absorbing a neutron.  This chain reaction must be responsible for turning on a  portion of the nuclear core in reactor #1, without human intervention, considering it was shut down, at the same time as all of the other reactors, which do not show signs of the isotopes present in #1.

Read more...

Japan's Triple Disaster: An Act of Genocide?

Over 11,000 people died and 16,500 are still missing from the triple disaster that devastated Japan on March 11, 2011. Moreover, millions...possibly billions of people, worldwide, will suffer consequences from this horrific event. So, I hope that what geoscientist and international radiation expert, Leuren Moret says about the Japanese earthquake and tectonic warfare is not true; however, she sure seems to know what she's talking about.

From March 20, 2011:



From March 27, 2011:




Two Flyovers shot in high definition on 24 March 2011 of the smoldering ruins of the Fukushima nuclear plant



Links:



Bodies of 1,000 Too Toxic to Handle.

Read more...