Showing posts with label Saudi Arabia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Saudi Arabia. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Once Again the U.S. is Fomenting War.

The United States is sending heavy weapons--mortars, rocket-propelled grenades and anti-tank missiles -- from Libya to jihadist Syrian rebels.  Not that this should come as any surprise considering our history of covertly facilitating upheaval, unrest and destabilization of nations, from Operation Gladio, which, controlled by the CIA and Britain’s MI6, orchestrated terrorist attacks in Western Europe, which were blamed on Communist entities to Operation Cyclone, the program to arm and finance the Mujahideen during the Soviet war in Afghanistan, 1979 to 1989, to Iran-Contra where the Reagan administration used proceeds from arms sale to Iran to fund the right-wing Contras in an effort to overturn Nicaragua’s democratically elected, Sandanista government. 

"The Americans have bought some of the weapons from the stockpiles of Muammar Gadaffi, the Libyan dictator killed last year. They include SA-7 missiles, which can be used to shoot down aircraft.
According to Fox News, Ambassador Chris Stevens, murdered on the anniversary of 9/11, while on a highly secretive U.S. mission in Benghazi was really there to "to negotiate a weapons transfer in an effort to get SA-7 missiles out of the hands of Libya-based extremists."

Moreover, supposedly, leaked documents from the Saudi Interior Ministry show that criminals convicted of drug trafficking, murder and rape have been given a choice to fight in Syria. Documents show that 105 Yemenis, 21 Palestinians, 212 Saudis, 96 Sudanese, 254 Syrians, 82 Jordanians, 68 Somalis, 32 Afghans, 194 Egyptians, 203 Pakistanis, 23 Iraqis, 44 Kuwaitis had taken up the offer of a death row pardon.

After arming Libyan rebels and taking out their leader, we're now arming Syrian rebels.  Why are we supporting Islamic extremists--the very people the U.S. government pegs as terrorists--to overthrow Assad? 

Again, this is nothing new. The not-so-mainstream media has been reporting this for a very long time.

Links:

'Annex' hit in Libya terror attack was CIA post, officials say

CIA Takes Heat for Role in Libya


Rep: 'Blissful silence' from Pentagon on questions over arms shipments from Libya to Syria

NATO-backed terrorists along Turkish-Syrian border establish Al Qaeda-style "Virtue, Vice Police," heralding the West's true designs for Syria.

Read more...

Monday, May 19, 2008

Divorce Saudi Arabian Style

A Saudi Arabian woman, after 30 years of marriage, wants a divorce.

Why?

Her husband, slightly curious, tried to lift her veil as she slept to take a look at her face. Something tells me if her husband had succeeded and unveiled his bride, he would be the one demanding a divorce.

Just a hunch.


After 30 years of marriage, cynics might say most husbands and wives would have seen quite enough of each other, thank you very much.

But not in the case of one Saudi Arabian man who managed to live with his wife for three decades without setting eyes on her face.

Not that he had much choice about it. His 50-year-old wife followed the tradition of her native village near the south-western city of Khamis Mushayt and kept her features veiled at all times.

Until one night last month, that is, when the husband was finally overcome by curiosity and tried to lift his wife's veil as she slept to take a look at her face.

Scroll down for more ...

Tradition: In the village in South West Saudia Arabia, women keep their features veiled at all times (file picture)

It was an error he is unlikely to be given a chance to repeat for his outraged wife woke up during his sneak peek and is now demanding a divorce.

'After all these years, he tries to commit such a big mistake,' she told Saudi newspaper Al-Riyadh after leaving the house in disbelief.

She said her husband apologised and promised never to do it again, but she insisted she wanted a divorce. It is not the first example of Saudi husbands with wives forever shrouded in mystery.

There was the case of Ali al-Qahtani whose wife had been wearing a face veil for the entire ten years of their marriage. When he tried to take it off she threatened to leave and only decided to stay after he swore never to try again.

And neither the husband or children of Om Rabea al-Gahdaray, 70, have ever seen her face. It was a family tradition, also followed by her mother and sisters, which her husband accepted and never tried to change, she said. When asked how she could have children without her husband ever seeing her face, she replied: "Marriage is about love, not faces."

Many Islamic countries such as Saudi Arabia and Iran require women to cover their faces in public but in the privacy of their homes there is no such compulsion.

But always remaining veiled - even in front of your husband - is not an Islamic practice, but a very old tradition practised by a tiny minority of women in remote areas of Gulf countries.

Most examples of it are in Saudi, one of the most conservative of countries.

Read more...

Sunday, July 15, 2007

Our Oil-Rich "Ally" Saudi Arabia Appears to be Our Biggest Enemy In Iraq


The majority of the 9/11 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia, our "ally". Now it appears that our "ally" is home to the majority of all the foreign militants attacking our troops and Iraqi civilians as well.

The LA Times reports about 45% of all foreign militants zeroing in on U.S. troops and Iraqi civilians and security forces are from Saudi Arabia and almost half of the 135 foreigners in U.S. detention facilities in Iraq are Saudis.

"Fighters from Saudi Arabia are thought to have carried out more suicide bombings than those of any other nationality, said the senior U.S. officer, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the subject's sensitivity,

...He said 50% of all Saudi fighters in Iraq come here as suicide bombers. In the last six months, such bombings have killed or injured 4,000 Iraqis."
It's almost impossible to believe the Saudis are not aware of this situation.

Iraqi Shiite lawmaker Sami Askari, an advisor to Prime Minister Nouri Maliki, accused Saudi officials of a deliberate policy to sow chaos in Baghdad.

...The fact of the matter is that Saudi Arabia has strong intelligence resources, and it would be hard to think that they are not aware of what is going on," he said.


Invade Iran? What about this enormous elephant in the room?

Read more...

Thursday, March 29, 2007

Saudi King Condemns US Occupation in Iraq

King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia told Arab leaders on Wednesday that the American occupation of Iraq is “illegal,” and he warned that unless Arab governments settle their differences, foreign powers like the United States would continue to dictate the region’s politics.

The king’s speech, at the opening of the Arab League summit meeting here, underscored growing differences between Saudi Arabia and the Bush administration as the Saudis take on a greater regional leadership role, partly at American urging. The Saudis seem to be emphasizing that they will not be beholden to the policies of their longtime ally.

Read more...

Saturday, February 24, 2007

Saudi's Cutbacks Raise Oil Concerns

By MICHAEL E. KANELL
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 02/20/07

Drivers who remember those $3-a-gallon days of the past two years, be warned.

Oil prices are up and the world's biggest producer has been cutting back — a recipe for those prices to keep on climbing.

But whether they are still arching skyward by the time summer driving starts depends largely on just why Saudi Arabia has been pumping less crude.

No one outside the kingdom really knows for sure, but some oil experts think the Saudis' oil reserves may not support increased production.

Official Saudi explanations for production cuts cite the recent dips in global prices, arguing that a little shrinkage in supply will help stabilize the market. So when demand accelerates this summer, a little boost to Saudi production would keep prices from soaring.

But what if the Saudis cut back because they had no choice?

"It's going to be a different world if Saudi Arabian production is going into decline," said economist James Hamilton of the University of California, San Diego. "If that is the world we are in, we really need to be making plans."

The price of a regular gasoline averaged $2.10 a gallon in metro Atlanta on Monday, up a dime in a month, according to GasBuddy.com. During that same period, the global price of oil has risen about 14 percent.

Meanwhile, Saudi production is reportedly down about 1 million barrels a day from an average of about 9.5 million barrels a day through much of 2005.

It is not just the decline that is troubling, Hamilton said. "I don't know for sure what the answer is, but I find the facts disturbing."

• Cutbacks started when prices were high.

• The Saudis have been nearly frantic in their recent drilling for more oil.

• Some reports show the Saudis increasingly relying on lower-quality, less valuable oil.

The questions about Saudi Arabia tap into an ongoing controversy.

Nearly all geologists agree that sooner or later the world will reach the midway point in the era of oil, the moment when half the Earth's crude has been pumped. But there is a small, vocal contingent who have been warning that the world is approaching peak oil very soon.

Or is already there.

From the moment "peak oil" arrives, the search will be on for cost-efficient alternative fuels. Meanwhile, producers will have an incentive to hunt for and pump lower-quality or hard-to-find crude.

Relentless economic pressures will send oil — now selling for just under $60 a barrel — steadily toward the stratosphere, Hamilton said. "If Saudi Arabia is in decline, then oil is way too cheap."

Saudi Arabia has long claimed a massive oil reserve and — since the decline of U.S. production and the breakup of the Soviet Union — it has been the global production leader.

But many of Saudi Arabia's fields are more than a half-century old.

In the early 1970s, the Saudis led the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Counties in aggressive action. Some of the goals were political, some strictly about boosting revenue.

But a tripling of oil prices spurred recession among the world's largest economies, who were also OPEC customers. For the next several decades, the Saudis pursued a careful strategy: Keep prices high enough to fill the country's coffers, but not so high that customers get serious about conservation and alternative forms of energy.

The Saudis are not always successful, but hardly anyone else could even make the attempt. Saudi Arabia has been virtually the only producer with enough extra capacity — and discipline — to move the market.

Saudi skeptics, like oil investor turned critic Matthew Simmons, say the Saudis cannot admit that their market power is dribbling away. But the scramble to find more oil, Simmons says, is evidence of desperation.

For their part, the Saudis dismiss the concerns — and many experts back them up.

Amy Myers Jaffe, associate director of the energy program at Rice University in Houston, said that the Saudis are spending enormous amounts of money finding more oil, and they are likely to make up for fields that have peaked — and then some. "They are like people on a treadmill who have to run a little faster," she said.

The Saudis aim to expand capacity by 3 million barrels a day so they can maintain their role, she said. "The Saudis have been explicit. They need more capacity so they can continue to balance the market."

Yet there are other short-term issues, like Iran.

Concern about Iran's ambitions — and a possible confrontation with the United States — only makes it harder to read the Saudis.

Iran is a Shiite state and the world's fourth-largest oil producer. Saudi Arabia is dominated by a Sunni sect that has often been at odds with the Shiites. The two nations are seen as supporters of opposing sides in Iraq, even as they vie for a larger leadership role in the region.

Yet experts say Saudi Arabia, where oil production is relatively cheap, can handle low oil prices better than Iran — whose government has used oil revenue to smooth over recent economic trouble.

So why would the Saudis lower production and raise prices when it serves their Iranian rivals?

It may be, Jaffe argues, that the Saudis do not want to push Iran into a corner yet. It may also be that they want to have lots of extra pumping capacity ready if there is a crisis.

Now, the market is mostly balanced, she argues.

"I'd be surprised to see the price go to $75 a barrel again," Jaffe said. "But if they get into a war and start blowing up each other's oil facilities, the price is going to go way past $75."

Read more...

Friday, February 23, 2007

Saudi Arabia hangs and then publicly crucifies four expats

Saudi Arabia hanged and then crucified four Sri Lankan expats convicted of robbery and put their mutilated bodies in public display, according to the Sri Lanka Foreign Ministry.

Human Rights groups have condemned the action by Saudi Authorities for executing without prior notification the men who were originally only sentenced to imprisonment.

“The execution of these four migrants, who had been badly beaten and locked up for years without access to lawyers, is a travesty of justice,” said Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East and North Africa director at Human Rights Watch. “International law only allows states to use the death penalty for the most serious crimes and in the most stringent of circumstances – and neither condition was met in this case.”

The Sri Lankan embassy identified the men as Victor Corea, Ranjith Silva, Sanath Pushpakumara and Shamila Sangeeth Kumara.

The men were convicted for armed robbery by the General Court in Riyadh according to a judgment delivered in October 2004, but Amnesty International alleged that the trial did not meet minimum international standards of justice.

The Sri Lanka Embassy in Riyadh, responsible for around 350,000 Sri Lankan migrants are estimated to be working in Saudi Arabia, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Colombo had been closely following up this case and the Government presented two appeals for clemency first by former President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga and subsequently by President Mahinda Rajapakse to the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz.

The latter appeal was delivered by hand by the President’s Special Envoy Minister Hon. A H M Fowzie, Minister of Petroleum and Petroleum Resources Development to Crown Prince Sultan bin Abdulaziz in Riyadh on 29th May 2006.

Amnesty International reported that Saudi Arabia has executed 17 persons already in 2007.

Read more...

Saturday, February 03, 2007

Could Iran Become an Ally?

by: Thomas Friedman

Here’s a little foreign policy test. I am going to describe two countries — “Country A” and “Country B” — and you tell me which one is America’s ally and which one is not.
Let’s start: Country A actively helped the U.S. defeat the Taliban in Afghanistan and replace it with a pro-U.S. elected alliance of moderate Muslims. Country A regularly holds sort-of-free elections. Country A’s women vote, hold office, are the majority of its university students and are fully integrated into the work force.
On 9/11, residents of Country A were among the very few in the Muslim world to hold spontaneous pro-U.S. demonstrations. Country A’s radical president recently held a conference about why the Holocaust never happened — to try to gain popularity. A month later, Country A held nationwide elections for local councils, and that same president saw his candidates get wiped out by voters who preferred more moderate conservatives. Country A has a strategic interest in the success of the pro-U.S., Shiite-led, elected Iraqi government. Although it’s a Muslim country right next to Iraq, Country A has never sent any suicide bombers to Iraq, and has long protected its Christians and Jews. Country A has more bloggers per capita than any country in the Muslim Middle East.
The brand of Islam practiced by Country A respects women, is open to reinterpretation in light of modernity and rejects Al Qaeda’s nihilism.
Now Country B: Country B gave us 15 of the 19 hijackers on 9/11. Country B does not allow its women to drive, vote or run for office. It is illegal in Country B to build a church, synagogue or Hindu temple. Country B helped finance the Taliban.
Country B’s private charities help sustain Al Qaeda. Young men from Country B’s mosques have been regularly recruited to carry out suicide bombings in Iraq. Mosques and charities in Country B raise funds to support the insurgency in Iraq. Country B does not want the elected, Shiite-led government in Iraq to succeed. While Country B’s leaders are pro-U.S., polls show many of its people are hostile to America — some of them celebrated on 9/11. The brand of Islam supported by Country B and exported by it to mosques around the world is the most hostile to modernity and other faiths.
Question: Which country is America’s natural ally: A or B?
Country A is, of course. Country A is Iran. Country B is Saudi Arabia.
Don’t worry. I know that Iran has also engaged in terrorism against the U.S. and that the Saudis have supported America at key times in some areas. The point I’m trying to make, though, is that the hostility between Iran and the U.S. since the overthrow of the shah in 1979 is not organic. By dint of culture, history and geography, we actually have a lot of interests in common with Iran’s people. And I am not the only one to notice that.
Because the U.S. has destroyed Iran’s two biggest enemies — the Taliban and Saddam — “there is now a debate in Iran as to whether we should continue to act so harshly against the Americans,” Mohammad Hossein Adeli, Iran’s former ambassador to London, told me at Davos. “There is now more readiness for dialogue with the United States.”
More important, when people say, “The most important thing America could do today to stabilize the Middle East is solve the Israel-Palestine conflict,” they are wrong. It’s second. The most important thing would be to resolve the Iran-U.S. conflict.
That would change the whole Middle East and open up the way to solving the Israel-Palestine conflict, because Iran is the key backer of Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah and Syria. Iran’s active help could also be critical for stabilizing Iraq.
This is why I oppose war with Iran. I favor negotiations. Isolating Iran like Castro’s Cuba has produced only the same result as in Cuba: strengthening Iran’s Castros. But for talks with Iran to bear fruit, we have to negotiate with Iran with leverage.
How do we get leverage? Make it clear that Iran can’t push us out of the gulf militarily; bring down the price of oil, which is key to the cockiness of Iran’s hard-line leadership; squeeze the hard-liners financially. But all this has to be accompanied with a clear declaration that the U.S. is not seeking regime change in Iran, but a change of behavior, that the U.S. wants to immediately restore its embassy in Tehran and that the first thing it will do is grant 50,000 student visas for young Iranians to study at U.S. universities.
Just do that — and then sit back and watch the most amazing debate explode inside Iran. You can bet the farm on it

Read more...
Iraq Deaths Estimator
Petitions by Change.org|Start a Petition »

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP