It Makes Perfect Sense.

I've read about, posted about, watched about, listened about big brother, big data, big tech, big "you-name-it", knowing full well that every keystroke I've every keyed; every website I've ever visited; every search I've ever searched; every Youtube I've ever watched; every post I've ever posted; every "like" I've ever liked; every download I've ever downloaded, etc., were and still are most certainly being stored, recorded, and/or deposited somewhere out there in the great big beyond, but it wasn't until I came across this post in Threadreaderapp.com-- and apparently this understates the problem considerably because what you get when you request your data, even if it's comparatively nothing because you'd already disabled all that, is still only a fraction of the total data they have for you -- that it really hit me, and kind of, sort of blew my mind., yet, like I said, of course, this didn't surprise me at all if that makes any sense. There's a kind of disconnect between what I know and what I know if that makes any sense. I mean, I know things in my head in an abstract intellectual sense that I don't really know in my heart if that makes any sense.

No, it doesn't make any sense?

Well, for example,  I might know lots about evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plans formulated in secret by two or more persons, yet when I see real life evidence of these, dare I say, conspiracies, I'm startled, as in my heart beats faster, my eyes get larger, my blood pressure rises, while at the same time, I'm  telling myself, "no surprise here," and to the very few people I have tried to convince of these, dare I say, conspiracies, whether they're there or not, I say, "I told you so."

I know this sounds like the ramblings of a lunatic, and maybe it is, but I need an outlet.  I need to pretend someone's paying attention to me, pretend that's someone is taking me seriously,  pretend that someone's reading this and just hope it's not anyone I know, or that if they do know me that they don't find out it's me blogging all of this stuff.  Because, yes, I'm a coward.

 However, now it's very clear to me that whether or not anyone's reading this stuff now, there is no doubt that everything I've ever posted about, read about, watched about, listened about, etc, is all out there for anyone to pull up in a heartbeat, connect it to me and...and that's kind of scary because those certain someones--multi-millionaire/billionaire class of data owners--certainly won't like what I've posted about, read about, listened about, watched about, etc...in other words, they won't like what I thought about.

But I'm just a nobody.  Why in the world would they care what I think?  That's what I've told myself all along so I kept on posting, reading, watching, listening, downloading....

More than ever before, I hope I'm being paranoid because surely, I'm a needle in a haystack or more aptly, a needle in a mountain of needles.  Surely, I'm a winning half-a billion-dollar lottery ticket,  a grain of sand on a beach, a book at the Library of Congress, a leaf in a forest, a blade of grass in a meadow...well, you get the picture.  

See how that works?  My need to outlet far exceeds my need to shut the hell up.

“So we are in a really bad state of affairs right now, in my opinion. It is eroding the core foundation of how people behave by and between each other. And I don’t have a good solution. My solution is I just don’t use these tools anymore. I haven’t for years. -Chamath Palihapitiya, former Vice President of user growth @Facebook.

Links:

How Facebook Figures Out Everyone You've Ever Met

The Social Ties that Unbind

GDPR Reports

On May 25th, 2018, the new EU rules called General Data Protection Regulation(GDPR) goes into effect. It applies to companies who have users that are EU citizens, residents or visitors. The fine to companies that violate the rules can be 20 million euro or up to 4% of global revenue. The new rules requires opt-in for data collection and deletion of data when users withdraw their consent. It also lets a user request user data from a company that has data on a user, the company has to send it within a month for free.

GDPR Subject Access Requests

Everybody (in the EU) vs. Facebook

Framasoft runs various open source services

Surveillance and Capture: Two Models of Privacy

TrackMeNot

Read more...

Solving the Brutal Murder of a Prominent Orthopedic Surgeon and World Renowned Expert in Cancer Research

Dr. Mary Stults Sherman and the apartment building she was found murdered

Prominent orthopedic surgeon and world renowned expert in cancer research,  Dr. Mary Sherman (left) was brutally murdered on July 21, 1964 (the same day the Warren Commission started taking testimony on Lee Harvey Oswald’s activities in New Orleans) in her apartment building on St. Charles Avenue, in New Orleans. This 'assassination' remains officially unsolved--maybe because of the memo from J Edgar Hoover telling SAC-NO (Special Agent-in-charge of the New Orleans FBI office) that no active FBI investigation was to be conducted into the Mary Sherman murder--but there are some investigators and authors, in particular, Edward T. Haslam, author of Dr. Mary’s Monkey: How the Unsolved Murder of a Doctor, a Secret Laboratory in New Orleans and Cancer-Causing Monkey Viruses are Linked to Lee Harvey Oswald, the JFK Assassination and Emerging Global Epidemics, and Mary, Ferrie and the Monkey Virus: Story of an Underground Medical Laboratory, who discovered the truth regarding this very strange murder and, believe it or not, the assassination of John F. Kennedy is closely intertwined. 

Dr. Sherman was stabbed in the heart, liver, arm, leg, and stomach, and her right arm and rib cage were completely incinerated, totally disintegrated, yet the hair on her head remained untouched. The incinerated body parts supposedly occurred due to a small mattress fire, but the investigators determined that the massive burns inflicted upon her could not have occurred in her apartment.  Of course, the details of her missing arm and ribs were not released to the public.  Moreover, the wound to the heart hemorrhaged but the wound to the liver did not, indicating that she was alive at the time of the heart wound but already dead by the time the wound to the liver was inflicted.

Who? What? Why?



A little more history on the subject:

Read more...

Is AIDS a Deliberately Created Biological Agent?

We've been led to believe that AIDS came from African Green Monkeys, but  many very intelligent people, including doctors, lawyers and Nobel Peace Prize winners seem to think that this fatal leap from ape to man theory is pure rubbish, backed up by politically motivated, psuedoscience. Moreover, they can prove Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) was created in a lab with documentation. And some, such as Dr. Body 'Ed' Graves, J.D., have experienced, first hand, the ramifications of not only exposing that evidence, but through his personal experience with HIV/AIDS.

In 2004, ecologist Wangari Maathai, the first African woman to win the Nobel Peace Prize, claimed that the AIDS virus was a deliberately created biological agent, a genocidal plot against the third world. She won the prize for her work in human rights and reversing deforestation across Africa.

How is this possible when genetic manipulation is, from what we've been told, fairly recent technology? Well, according to Dr. Romesh Senewiratne, if you read the work of Macfarlane Burnet (biological warfare expert) and publications of the Walter and Eliza Hall institute in the 1950s and 60s you will find that techniques for genetic manipulation of viruses through a range of means was underway long before the appearance of HIV. In fact, you can trace the genetic engineering/manipulation back to the early 1900s, beginning with the Rockefeller-funded research of Peyton Rous, who transplanted cancer between species in the early 1900s.

“When "kuru" (a New Guinean term [to represent] infective spongiform encephalitis [now referred to as prion]) ) was first described by Carlton Gadjusek and MacFarlane Burnet as an infective agent "spread by cannibalism" in the 1950s, it was described as a "slow virus". These were later termed "retroviruses". In fact, the infection they called "kuru" is pathologically indistinguishable from a sheep virus known as "scrapie". It so happens that the epidemic broke out very close to an ANZAC Second World War base, and that Macfarlane Burnet (from Melbourne University) and Gadjusek (from NIH) were both biological warfare experts.
[...]
HIV was developed as a retrovirus (previously called a 'slow virus') by scientists in Australia, USA, Japan and France. It was seeded into targeted populations through a number of means - infected batches of vaccines, blood transfusions and other blood products, and possibly specially bred mosquitoes (entomological warfare, at which Australia's CSIRO are world leaders)...
[...]
My research suggests that HIV was manufactured from selective splicing of pathogenic genes into the sheep retrovirus known as "scrapie" using bacteriophage technology (in which the Australian scientist Sir Frank MacFarlane Burnet was a pioneer in the 1940s, 50s and 60s). Infected batches of vaccines (notably hepatitis B vaccines, injected polio and smallpox vaccines) are implicated in the initial epidemics in Africa and the USA and subsequent epidemics in New Guinea and the Pacific Islands.-- Dr. Romesh Senewiratne

One more thing. HIV/AIDS is not a gay disease, which becomes evident once you begin looking at the epidemiological facts. Since this biological agent began ravaging sub-Saharan Africa--which is home to just over 12% of the world’s population but two-thirds of all people infected with HIV, 13 women for every 10 men--in the early 1980s it has NOT been associated with either homosexuality or injecting drug use there.












"Eugenics and Genocide in the Modern World - the Cause of the AIDS Epidemic"

Read more...

The Bizarre and Strange Circumstances Surrounding the Death of JFK Jr.

Mostly taken from the documentary Dark Legacy II The Murder of JFK Jr.

The report of the National Transportation Safety Board came out on August 8, 2000 (on January 8, 2001, the NTSB removed their original posting, and greatly edited the contents of the report. The unedited original NTSB report, downloaded from the NSTB website in August of 2000, can be read at link), 13 months after the plane crash of JFK Jr.  It contradicts many of the lies pushed in the media.

Timeline:

On John’s fatal last Friday, he told his staff not to worry about their jobs, because, “As long as I’m alive, this magazine will continue to publish.” This would be a really cruel thing for a guy to say who was planning to kill himself in a few hours.

At 8:30, 45 minutes after arriving, John, his sister-in-law, and his wife took off from Caldwell Airport in NJ, and headed northeast toward Martha’s Vineyard ascending to a cruising altitude of 5,500 feet. An NTSB radar analysis shows the final moments of the flight in great detail.

At 9:33, the plane, still headed northeast, began descending from its cruising altitude of 5,500 feet.

At 9:38 the plane while still descending began a slight turn to the right so that it was headed due east, lining itself up with the southern coast of Martha’s Vineyard.

At 9:38 and and 20 seconds the plane completed the turn and stopped its descent, leveling off at 2200 feet. But it’s against FAA regulations for a plane to fly below 2,500 feet without first contacting the tower. So in a manner that’s typical of John’s carefulness and following procedures, he brought the plant back up to 2,500 feet.

At 9:38 and 50 seconds, with wings level, the plane was on final approach, with 14 miles to go to the airport. At 200 mph, the plane would land in about 5 minutes.

At 9:39 John contacted the tower.

At 9:40 and 15 seconds, one minute and 15 seconds later, the plane suddenly dove out of the sky, falling 2,500 feet in 45 seconds, crashing into the water at 200 mph.

At 10:00 Adam Budd (link is cached page because link was removed from Boston.com) reported the missing plane to the FAA.

“An employee of Martha's Vineyard Airport alerted federal aviation officials that John F. Kennedy Jr.'s plane was unaccounted for nearly four hours before a phone call from a Kennedy family friend early Saturday morning triggered a massive air and sea search.

The first phone call - which cited Kennedy by name - prompted no action by the Federal Aviation Administration. It was made at 10:05 p.m. Friday, only 25 minutes after Kennedy's plane was lost on radar and presumably crashed into the ocean.

''Actually, Kennedy Jr.'s on board. He's, uh, they wanna know, uh, where he is,'' Adam Budd told an unidentified FAA employee at the Bridgeport Automated Flight Service Station.

Until the plane is found, there is no way to say if an earlier search would have made a difference in the survival chances of Kennedy, his wife, Carolyn Bessette Kennedy, or her sister, Lauren Bessette.

However, a transcript of Budd's call, obtained by the Globe, adds fuel to questions about whether the FAA responded as promptly as it should have, and as quickly as its own regulations specify, to concerns about Kennedy's missing plane.

FAA officials said they responded appropriately to the call.

''We've researched the matter and found the FAA was not told that the aircraft was overdue, or that there was any indication there was a problem or a cause for concern that would raise warning flags,'' said Eliot Brenner, a senior FAA spokesman.

Kennedy was flying to Martha's Vineyard to drop off Lauren Bessette, after which he planned to fly to Hyannis to attend the wedding of his cousin Rory Kennedy. A well-dressed couple with a child who had come to the airport to meet Lauren Bessette grew concerned when the plane did not arrive as expected by 10 p.m.

They sought help from Budd, 21, a Bridgewater State College student from Sharon, Mass. In a telephone interview last night, Budd said he is also a licensed pilot who has worked for the past month as a ramp attendant at the airstrip.

Budd said he first called the airport tower, but was told Kennedy's plane was not expected - Kennedy had filed no flight plan - and that it had made no radio contact.

Budd then called the FAA outpost in Bridgeport, Conn., a repository for flight plans that also provides pilots with weather information and notices about flight restrictions.

During his conversation with the unidentified FAA employee, Budd asked if the FAA could track an airplane. Budd said he was with airport operations at Martha's Vineyard, then mentioned Kennedy's name and provided two possible aircraft numbers for Kennedy's plane.

The employee questioned Budd repeatedly about who he was and where he was calling from. After Budd gave his name, the FAA employee asked if he was, in fact, with airport operations. He ultimately told Budd, ''We don't give this information out to people over the phone.''

At that point Budd gave up, saying, ''I'll just have 'em wait,'' and then, ''All right, it's no big deal.''

In the interview, Budd said the transcript tells only part of the story.

''You have to hear his tone of voice, because the guy was kind of rude to me, making me feel uncomfortable,'' he said. ''I've called before and they were happy to help me out. The guy might have been having a bad day or something. I don't know.''

Brenner, the FAA spokesman, said the problem with the tone was Budd's. ''There was no tone of concern in the voice or anything out of the ordinary,'' Brenner said. ''There needed to be some expression that this airplane is overdue.''

In the end, no action was taken until a 2:15 a.m. Saturday phone call from Carol Ratowell, a Kennedy family friend. Her call to the Coast Guard set in motion a multiagency search that began with calls to regional airports and officially became a search and rescue mission at 3:28 a.m.

Globe correspondent Jennifer Babson contributed to this report.

No search and rescue

Breaking news broadcasts at the time of the incident reported that there was final communication between the FAA and JFK Jr’s plane at the precise moment of 9:39 PM according to Petty Officer Todd Burgun from the Coast Guard base in Boston. This is absolutely consistent with the radar information from the NTSB that was used to reconstruct the last moments of the plane before it crashed therefore his report is credible, otherwise he could not have identified the exact minute that the plane was holding at 2,500 feet, waiting to get clearance from the tower before descending. He had to have gotten that information from FAA flight personnel in the tower at Martha’s Vineyard Airport.

This contact by JFK Jr. to the airport is very important for numerous reasons. Whenever you contact air traffic control, your particular radar blip is then entered into the FAA’s air traffic computer system. If anywhere on your flight path your plane should happen to descend below 100 feet, the computer will automatically set off an alarm at the FAA Traffic Control Facility. Therefore, as a result of Kennedy’s 9:39 contact with the tower, the computer should’ve set off a low altitude alarm in the FAA’s traffic control offices when the plane descended below 100 feet.

The FAA should’ve begun the search at 9:40 when this low altitude alarm went off. They knew before the plane hit the water. FAA regulations require that a search commence anytime a plane contacts the tower on its final approach and then fails to land within 5 minutes. As a result of JFK Jr’s contact with the tower,, the FAA also should’ve begun a search at 9:44 when JFK Jr’s plane failed to land.

How long did it take the FAA to begin a focused search... searching the approaches to the Martha Vineyard’s airport?

15 ½ HOURS!

The cover up:

The information containing JFK Jr’s contact with the FAA was disappeared. At 12:30 Burgun was removed/silenced from any further reports of any kinds. In fact, all government agencies went silent and reporters were referred to the Pentagon spokesman, Col. Steven Roark.

The report from Todd Burgun wasn’t the only on-the-scene reporting that disappeared from the news by the Pentagon. According to the Pentagon the families of both JFK Jr and Carolyn Bessette waited 4 hours to report them missing. Total lie! Friends of Lauren Bessette, Carolyn’s sister, were waiting at the airport and when the plane didn’t land at around 10:00, quickly reported it to the FAA officials, who did nothing.

One hour later, at 11 PM Senator Edward Kennedy contacted the FAA to let them know the plane was missing. The FAA officials did nothing.

Since the FAA refused to act, at 2:15 AM a family friend, Carol Radziwill, contacted the Coast Guard. The Coast Guard contacted the FAA. The FAA then contacted the Air Force who told the Coast Guard that they were in charge and sent the Coast Guard on a wild goose chase, to search an area 100 miles away from anywhere the plane may have gone down.

Linda Killian from People Magazine questioned Lt. Col. Steve Roark, the director of the U.S. Air Force's National Search and Rescue School at the time and former director of the Air Force Rescue Coordination Center, on TV about the time discrepancy regarding official notification of the missing plane. Raw uninterrupted static cut her off before she could even finish the question. This question never got answered and never got asked again and never got any mention in any media outlet.

At 6:30 AM Ted Kennedy woke up John Podesta, Clinton’s Chief of Staff. At 7:00 AM, Podesta woke up Clinton. At 7:15, Clinton told Podesta to call the Air Force and warn them if they didn’t have a search underway in 15 minutes, they shouldn’t bother to come to work Monday morning because they would all be fired, if they weren’t in jail.

So the Air Force scattered two planes and two helicopters across 20,000 square miles of ocean. The Air Force kept them searching this vast expanse for the next five and a half hours.

click image to enlarge

Of course, there were honest employees at the FAA who did their job, one of which is to perform what is called an “N-Tap” radar analysis. An “N-Tap” goes back to take-off, starting with the plane identifying itself to the tower, giving its “N number” its registration number, in this case, N529JK. The plane’s radar blip is identified at take-off. And this particular blip is then followed along its flight path until it disappears, indicating the crash site. The New York Times said this report was available at 5 AM.

When Col. Roark was asked why he his search was scattered all over the Atlantic, when the “N-Tap” report was available 8 hours earlier, pinpointing the location of crash, he said he would continue on the same track, stating that “we have nothing that absolutely pinpoints to one area as opposed to another, so we can’t rule out the entire flight.” When asked again about the radar position of the crash site, Roark lied and said it was just a “possible” position.

Moreover, all civil aircraft are required to carry an emergency beacon, an ELT (Emergency Locator Transmitter), which are crash activated. The ELT sends out a signal that is received by a network of satellites that can instantly locate the crash within a matter of a few feet. 

In other words, the FAA knew where JFK Jr's plane went down before it hit the water.  But, it wasn't until 1:00 the next afternoon when Lauren Bessette's suitcase washed up on shore that the Coast Guard was able to focus on something remotely near the crash site.

click to enlarge

JFK Jr was a careful and conscientious pilot, who did file a flight plan and who always flew his relatively new plane with a flight instructor as he was working on his instrument rating, not to mention his injured ankle.   He was not the careless, irresponsible daredevil that the media portrayed.  JFK Jr had a 17 year record--more than 300 hours--of careful, meticulous adherence to safety procedures.

Missing Pieces:

Where did the backup battery--necessary to preserve the last few words of the pilot on the radio and in the cockpit--to the cockpit voice recorder go?

Who was JFK Jr talking to minutes before he took off?  What as he talking about?  But it's missing despite the fact that it's supposed to be in the NTSB report.

Where is the aquamarine duffel that JFK Jr kept his flight log, which records who was on the plane?

What about the flight instructor who was reported--by family friend, Carol Radziwill--to be on the plane taken from the earliest statements after the crash? JFK Jr never flew his new plane without a flight instructor.  Later on, "the family" reported the flight instructor was not on the plane and that JFK Jr didn't even have a license to pilot the plane that crashed, when he most certainly did.

So who is this person identifying themselves as "the family" and spreading lies?  
Arnold Schwarzenegger, perhaps?



And where did the missing airplane seat go? Portions of five of the six seats were recovered. Could it be the reason for the delayed search?  They had to recover the body of the flight instructor who wasn't on the plane according to unreliable or coerced sources?

Read more...

Titanic: The Real Story.

Today, 100-years ago, the "unsinkable" "Titanic", accompanied by an ostentatious display of fanfare, departed from the English port city, Southampton, on its ill-fated "maiden voyage". Why so many words enclosed by quotation marks? Read on - and watch - and you shall see.

Last month, I blogged about the social amnesia of the collective that followed the SS Eastland disaster, where  close to 1,000 people (wiping out 22 entire families) died within a span of 6-minutes, when the packed-to-the-gills, top-heavy streamlined ship tipped over in the Chicago River, merely 3-years after the sinking of the "Titanic". Well, it appears the deep-seated corruption that contributed to the Eastland horror show that dreadful morning, played an even bigger role on April 15, 1912 when 1,507 people lost their lives. Only, we certainly didn't forget this tragedy. Every single American over 6-years old can tell you exactly what happened that sorrowful day in history. Or, can they?

The following film is based on extensive research and includes evidence of both British and American inquiries, the eyewitness reports of survivors, newspapers of the day, photographs, film and radio broadcasts. The views and opinions are based on evidence and legitimate inference.

What you are about to see is a reconstruction of events behind the disaster and the reasons for it.

Read more...

Trillion Dollar Fraud Investigation and High Profile Financial Services Executives Dropping Like Flies.

In addition to the OPEC covering Wall Street Journal reporter,  David Bird, who went missing on January 10, 2014,  within two weeks,  at least seven high profile financial executives have died under mysterious circumstances. 

On January 26, 2014, Tim Dickenson, a U.K.-based communications director at Swiss Re AG, died  The circumstances surrounding his death are undisclosed.

That same day, William Broeksmit, a former senior manager at Deutsche Bank--under investigation for potentially rigging the Foreign Exchange markets-- with close ties to co-Chief Executive Anshu Jain, was found hanging in his home, from an apparent suicide.

The next day, January 27, 2014, 51-year old Karl Slym, handpicked by Ratan Tata to revive the fortunes of Tata Motors in India, died in Bangkok on Sunday in a freak accident at the hotel where he was staying. Police said he may have committed suicide. 

The next day, January 28, 2014, Gabriel Magee, a 39-year-old senior manager at JP Morgan’s European headquarters, jumped 500ft from the top of the bank’s headquarters in central London on January 27, landing on an adjacent 9 story roof.

The next day, January 29, 2014, Mike Dueker, the chief economist at Russell Investments, fell down a 50 foot embankment in what police described as a suicide. 

“Mike Dueker, the chief economist at Russell Investments, was found dead at the side of a highway that leads to the Tacoma Narrows Bridge in Washington state, according to the Pierce County Sheriff’s Department. He was 50.

He may have jumped over a 4-foot (1.2-meter) fence before falling down a 40- to 50-foot embankment, Pierce County Detective Ed Troyer said yesterday. He said the death appeared to be a suicide.

Then, on February 3, 2014,  37-year old, JP Morgan Global Equities Trading Executive, Ryan Henry Crane, was found dead.  Crane, who oversaw the trade platforms had close working ties to the aforementioned deceased Gabriel Magee of JP Morgan's London office.  The cause of death will be determined when a toxicology report is completed in about six weeks.

Soon after, on February 7, 2014, Richard Talley, 57, founder of American Title Services in Centennial, Colorado, was found dead after apparently shooting himself  seven or eight times in the head and chest with a nail gun.  Suicide?  Really? That ranks up there with strangling oneself as Veritas Capital Founder Robert B. McKeon --who later purchased DynCorp, the private military contractor with a history of child trafficking--apparently accomplished.

So what's going on, here? Were these men killed because they knew too much? Did they flip during prosecution investigation? Thus, assassinated to prevent insider testimony concerning the colossal multi-trillion dollar fraud in the global financial casino ? Or did they all just decide to kill themselves after reading the writing on the wall?

Read more...

Assassination of JFK: Could it be Overlapping Agendas By Multiple Players?

Will America ever learn the truth of what happened that tragic day, 50 years ago? No, at least not in our lifetime, because, increasingly, reporting the truth, and/or the pursuit of truth is considered treason. History is handed down to us by the privileged classes, who are not only its authors, but the keeper of all important records. They, the privileged class, keep us immobilized as citizens by creating and maintaining a state of confusion where anything can be believed but nothing can be known for sure. That's precisely the kind of environment that was created right after the assassination of JFK.

Desipte the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collections Act of 1992,  there are more than 50,000 pages of documents regarding the assassination in the national archives yet to be released solely because the CIA doesn't want them released. So should we automatically assume the CIA killed John F. Kennedy? Not entirely. Remember that state of confusion they like to create? Well, there were plenty of different factions of government, industry, and even amongst nations, who had "good" reason, albeit, different reasons, for wanting Kennedy dead. You see, JFK was killed in order to change the direction of the nation on more than a few important policies.

The CIA, no doubt, had plenty of reason.  They were furious over Kennedy pulling the plug on the Bay of Pigs, for the firing of Allen Dulles, for threatening to destroy the agency completely, not to mention, his strong desire to end the Vietnam war. Then you have those pesky Texas oil billionaires who did not like Kennedy’s policy concerning oil depletion allowance.  Then you have organized crime who believed Kennedy had betrayed them after all the help they had given him to get elected. And what about Israel, who was furious that Kennedy refused to allow them to acquire nuclear weapons? And finally, members of the Federal Reserve who were very angry over Kennedy’s executive order 11110, which put $4.5 billion in currency into circulation to power commerce without accruing interest to the private central bank. In other words, re-established the Treasury’s power to print money. The assassination occurred 5 months after JFK signed EO 11110.

Executive Order 11,110

AMENDMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10289 AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS AFFECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:

Section 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended-

By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j): (j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12,1933, as amended (31 U.S.C.821(b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denomination of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption and—

By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof. Sec. 2. The amendments made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made.

John F. Kennedy

The White House, June 4, 1963.

When you have overlapping agendas by multiple powerful institutional self-interests, they will all cooperate to make it happen, and that is exactly what happened.  Though we'll probably never know the details, the truth is that all of these powers contributed, either directly or indirectly, in a very compartmentalized operation (need-to-know basis), giving everyone involved plausible deniability concerning both the assassination plot and subsequent coverup.

In the following videos, Peter Janney, author of Mary's Mosaic: The CIA Conspiracy to Murder John F. Kennedy, Mary Pinchot Meyer, and Their Vision for World Peace, whose father was a high-level CIA official involved in the death of JFK's mistress (the last two yeras of his life), Mary Pinochot Meyer, reveals "hidden facts and dark official secrets" which resulted in the assassination and cover up of JFK, not to mention, the subsequent assassination of the love of his life. 

“Vulnerability isn't necessarily a sign of weakness. Very often, it's the emerging strength of a healing heart crying out for connection. - Peter Janney,

Links:

Disappearing Witnesses: Over 100 murders, suicides and mysterious deaths - the strange fate of those who saw Kennedy shot

The Death Of John Kennedy: Convenient Deaths

Read more...

Sandy Hook: Sorting Fact From Fiction

With good reason, more than a few people remain skeptical of the official story regarding what happened in Sandy Hook that fateful morning, December 14, 2012. Once again, we're told to swallow whatever the mainstream media tells us without question, no matter how ludicrous. Misinformation abounds making the truth almost impossible to discern, however, by analyzing the timeline, it's possible to, at the very least, come to the conclusion that something is very wrong.

Mark Howitt has done an outstanding job collecting, assembling and analyzing information and evidence from the Sandy Hook shooting, and consolidating it into a two-hour documentary. He includes an investigation of the timeline of recordings of the police and medical scanners, which illuminates the order of events down to the second. As you will hear for yourself, the police audio reveals that there were seven suspects if you include Adam Lanza, who, by the way, died on December 13, 2012, according to the Social Security Death Index--and that's not the only date discrepancy, at least, three Sandy Hook memorial web pages were created and uploaded, from November 10 to December 13-- the day before the shooting. The audio also reveals that they were looking for a purple van with two people in ski masks, and one or more people dressed as nuns.  Not only that, at 9:55:44, an officer is heard stating" End the life of Adam."  End the life of Adam?  What's that supposed to mean?



On 12/14/2012, the same day of the Sandy Hook school shooting, the State of Connecticut Department of Homeland Security scheduled the course, FEMA L-366 Planning for the need of Children in Disasters only 20 minutes north of Newtown.

Read more...

Questioning the Unquestionable.

Philip Marshall is accused of shooting his children Alex, right and
Macaila Marshall, left, before turning the gun on himself

Last week, veteran airline captain, former government "special activities" contract pilot, and leading aviation expert on the September 11th attack, 54-year old Philip Marshall (left) supposedly killed his two teenage children, 14-year-old Macaila Marshall, and 17-year-old Alex Marshall, his dog and then himself in what appears to be a double murder-suicide. Of course, the few headlines that you'll read about this tragedy tout him as one of those horrific "conspiracy theorists," implying this is what these wretched people do.

And that's all it takes, just mention, "conspiracy theorist", and all logic, reason, critical thinking, common sense, etc., goes out the window, because god-forbid you get the label "conspiracy theorist". You better accept the official story, even when those official stories are riddled with glaring inconsistencies, giant holes, magical explanations and downright Orwellian idiocy.

Now, it's not that conspiracies do not exist, they do, however, in the U.S., the only people capable of evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plans formulated in secret by two or more persons are We the Useless Eaters.  You see, the most powerful and privileged class are incapable of creating surreptitious or covert schemes to accomplish some end. Never mind that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Never mind that the history of the United States is chock full of well-documented conspiracies at the highest levels. Never mind that that powerful people will do whatever they have to in order to preserve themselves and the established order. The bottom line is that by labeling and discrediting researchers, questioners, and the inquisitive-minded, the powers that be can keep the truth from worthless and highly annoying masses.

But if you've read any of Phillip Marshall's books, the latest being, The Big Bamboozle: 9/11 and the War on Terror, listened to any of his interviews, or read about his history flying planes for the CIA during Iran Contra, and do not question the official story, at least a little bit, you must've drank more than your share of the Kool-Aid.

Philip Marshall was a fairly sturdy guy, it seems. In the 1980s he flew missions for the U.S. government in connection with the DEA and CIA including a DEA sting on Pablo Escobar, and later participated in the covert arming of the Nicaraguan Contras. Marshall researched and wrote 30-years worth of covert government special activities and about the revolving door of Wall Street tricksters, media moguls, and their well funded politicians. 

Here's what Philip Marshall wrote days before on Jan 24, 2013. The title of this site is The Big Bamboozle

"One Saudi official in particular, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, Saudi Ambassador to the United States from 1983 to 2005, was quickly traced to direct funding of the hijackers, through cashier’s checks, not from him he would say, but from his wife. Alabama Senator Richard Shelby, Maine Senator Susan Collins and Florida Senator Bob Graham learned that Saudi officials had directed agents in the United States to assist the future hijackers. These senators would quietly back out of the investigation after the White House threatened them with “leaking classified information” and a criminal probe. Senator Graham was told in no uncertain terms to back off and shut up in telephone calls from Vice President Cheney. This evidence alone on the Saudis provided more plausibility than two chapters of KSM’s ramblings. Here was opportunity to provide airplanes and instructors for hijackers who were solidly linked to Saudi operatives working for Prince Bandar."

It's interesting to note that last year, two former American senators--Bob Graham and Bob Kerrey-- involved in federal inquiries regarding the 9/11 terrorist attacks asked the US to re-examine the possibility that Saudi Arabia played a pivotal role in the tragedy, which is at the heart of Phillip Marshall's book. Of course, the Bush Administration played the Saudi role down as much as possible--even giving the Bin-Ladens special flying privileges only hours after that fateful day whilst every one else in the USA was grounded--distracting us, instead, on Afghanistan first, then Iraq.

This firm belief in a Saudi Royal Family and Government connection has been sworn to by both Graham and Kerrey in open federal district court. These legal statements were made within the context of a multi-billion dollar lawsuit that is finally allowed to proceed against the Saudi Government and Royal family by the families of the 9/11 victims. In Graham's book, "Intelligence Matters," he makes clear that some details of that financial support from Saudi Arabia were in the 27 pages of the congressional inquiry's final report that were blocked from release by the administration, despite the pleas of leaders of both parties on the House and Senate intelligence committees.

Why "suicide" him and murder his family after the book is already out? Wouldn't that draw more attention? While it might draw more attention to his book, the fact that he was purportedly insane enough to kill his kids, himself and his dog certainly discredits everything he has to say, and at the same time, sending a clear message to those who might try to expose the un-exposable.

Of course, there is the very real possibility that the news as it is reported "officially" here, may very well be accurate. Nevertheless, that should not mean we can't ask questions to ascertain its validity, especially, considering how many lies we've been told.

Links:

New evidence links Saudis to 9/11

"Weeks after terrorists brought down the World Trade Center, FBI agents swarmed into a Sarasota gated community to investigate the mysterious disappearance of a wealthy young Saudi couple who apparently had ties to some of the hijackers. The couple and their two children abandoned their home abruptly, just a week or so before Sept. 11, leaving behind cars, furniture and food on countertops. According to one published report, the FBI discovered phone calls between the house and at least two of the hijackers and several other terrorism suspects stretching back a year. Yet until a Fort Lauderdale website reported the news this week, no mention of the couple has ever appeared publicly — not in the Sept. 11 commission report, nor in FBI briefings to congressional investigators, former Florida Sen. Bob Graham said Friday.

Read more...

Anatomy of a Massive Cover Up at the Highest Levels.

An inquest of an inquest:

The following documentary asks these questions:

Was it pure coincidence that Diana told people she would be deliberately killed in a car crash?

Why did the CCTV cameras along the route apparently fail to record anything?

Were the driver's blood samples tampered with to make him appear wildly drunk even though he seemed to be sober?

Why were Diana's phone calls being bugged by the secret service?

Who was driving the white Fiat Uno who may have caused the crash?

And last but certainly not least, why weren't the press more suspicious?

The unelected extended family of extremely wealthy aristocratic free-loaders, the Royals, like to present themselves as a benign and freedom loving tradition, thanks mostly to their highly paid establishment sycophants who wouldn't dare cross them. Wouldn't dare cross them?  Wait.  I thought the royals were figureheads whose birthright is upheld only to entertain and charm the masses with their quaint pageantry.

Not true.  I mean, the Queen has the power to unseat an elected Prime Minister.  That's right. According to the Constitution, all public power (executive, legislative and judicial) is created and commanded by the Queen. She has the power to: dismiss and appoint a Prime Minister (she may choose a Prime Minister of her own choice, though nominally she appoints the individual most capable of commanding the House of Commons); to dismiss and appoint other ministers; to summon, prorogue and dissolve Parliament; to grant or refuse Royal Assent to bills (making them valid and law; to commission officers in the Armed Forces; to command the Armed Forces of the United Kingdom; to appoint members to the Queen's Council; to issue and withdraw passports; to grant Prerogative of mercy (though Capital Punishment is abolished, this power is still used to remedy errors in sentence calculation); to grant honors; to create corporations via Royal Charter. She also has the power to shape foreign policy by: the power to ratify and make treaties; to declare War and Peace; to deploy the Armed Forces overseas; to recognize states; to credit and receive diplomats. Does that sound benign, or as if the Queen's merely a figurehead to you?

Which brings us to the car "accident" that killed Princess Diana, her driver, and her betrothed, Dodi Fayed. It was just after midnight, on August 31, 1997, that the much celebrated couple and their driver, Henri Paul, left the Paris Ritz in a Mercedes and then proceeded to crash into a concrete pillar in the Pont de l'Alma road tunnel, ten years later, leading to the largest, most sensational inquest in British history. Hundreds of witnesses were called.

"Whether you think it's an accident or murder, it was chillingly convenient for the Windsors that Diana died when she did."

Before continuing to read, keep in mind that there is no doubt that the media had already reached their verdict long before the inquest started, while at the same time, declaring it a waste of time and money. Many media organizations, including the BBC,  sent their royal reporters to cover it, rather than their legal ones. Even though Diana was no longer a royal at the time of her death After all, their job is to suck up to the palace and present the royals in a favorable light.

The French report of the "accident" was kept secret. The British report was riddled with contradictions. Several coroners came and went when attempts to hold the inquiry without a jury was finally overturned.

The inquest was held at the Royal Family's own court,  Royal Courts of Justice.  So is it any wonder that the royal representative in charge, the so called "judge", or coroner as it's called in the court system, in this case, Lord Justice Scott Baker, who has sworn an oath of allegiance to the Queen, has already decided that the key royal suspects need not even appear at the inquest in order to be questioned?

From the outset, it was clear that the coroner was on the side of the establishment, which is not surprising considering he is a part of it. He led the jury in the direction of it being an accident, despite the fact that right from the start, the circumstances surrounding the crash were very suspicious. Within minutes after the crash, the French police allowed a road sweeping van to wash away all of the evidence. That's exactly what the Pakistan police did on December 27, 2007 in Rawalpindi, Pakistan after Benezir Bhuto was assassinated.

Moreover, less than one day after the accident, the French authorities leaked a story to the press that this was an accident and that the driver was "dunk as a pig" before the blood test results were even complete. Later it came out that he only consumed two Ricards, one-quarter the alcohol the French authorities claimed.

The coroner even prevented the jurors from knowing the state of the relationship between Dodi and Diana. Prince Philip's very hostile letters to the Princess were redacted, or "censored into incomprehensibility." One witness, Simone Simmons, a friend of Diana, received a gag order, stating she could not mention these letters. She was not the only one to receive one. Makes you wonder how many people were paid off to stay silent.

In the days/weeks/months leading up to her murder, Princess Dianna and her affair with Dodi Fayed plastered the tabloid headlines, speculating on possible marriage, baby, etc. Diana said,

"The most daunting aspect was of the media attention, that I seemed to be on the front of the newspaper every single day, and the higher the media puts you...place you, the bigger the drop."

The inquest exploited this prior media frenzy for all it was worth by devoting several weeks to a minute investigation of her period, contraceptives and her sexual habits. Was she, in fact, impregnated by Dodi. It was as if the establishment wanted to de-mythologize her in the eyes of ordinary people.

Diana died after arriving at the hospital and although having been stripped of her royal status in life, in death, her corpse mysteriously became royal property. Within hours, royal representatives had given orders for her body to be partially embalmed, a process that conveniently made it impossible for anyone to tell if she had been pregnant.

What's more, Diana's attorney gave a sworn statement from Diana, predicting her death in a car "accident"--devastating evidence about Diana's security--and handed it over to Police Commissioner Condon (1993-2000) who concealed it for three years, who then passed it on to his replacement, Stevens, who concealed it for another 3 years. Both were made Lords by the queen for their good work.

Another thing, Diana habitually wore a seat belt with the exception of that fateful night when she sat in the rear right seat. Why? Well, when the car was subsequently examined by a crash expert on behalf of Metropolitan police , the rear right seat belt was found to be defective, "jammed in the retracted position because part of the integral mechanism had become displaced." Had it been tampered with? And why wasn't the inquest told about this?

Now most people still blame the paparazzi for causing the "accident", however, it was clearly demonstrated that they were not involved. While it's true some of the paparazzi outside the hotel set off in hot pursuit, they never caught up. Their scooters and motorcycles were unable to keep up with the much more powerful car. Police evidence given at the inquest confirmed, by the time the Mercedes entered the Pont de l'Alma road tunnel all the pursuing paparazzi had been left far behind.

Yet several witnesses had seen several motorcycles and a white Fiat Uno surrounding the Mercedes, along with several motorcycles, and blocking its progress as it entered the tunnel. They saw a very bright flash and then saw the white fiat collide with the Mercedes, which then lost control and crashed headfirst into a concrete pillar. Who was driving the other vehicles?? Because the paparazzi had been excluded after a very close analysis of all the known paparazzi who were on duty that night and they could all be accounted for.

What about the infamous cameras embedded all over the UK? Well, the always on CCTV at the entrance of the tunnel was conveniently switched off when Dodi and Diana's car entered its underground passage. But too many witnesses identified the car, and motorcycles, not to mention, the paint from the white Fiat Uno was found on the Mercedes. So who was driving this car? It's believed that James Andanson, a millionaire photographer, who owned a white Fiat Uno, connected to intelligence, and who was not present at the hotel when Diana and Dodi left, drove the car. Also, he gave contradictory alibis. Moreover, in the year 2000, Andanson's body was found in the trunk of a burned up car with two bullet holes in his skull, and no keys to be found anywhere. Despite those facts, the authorities declared it a suicide. Really? He drove the car without keys, shot himself in the head, twice! and then set the car on fire.

What about the "drunken pig" of a driver, Henri Paul?

Well, if he was really a chronic alcoholic, this would've been diagnosed during the stringent medical evaluation he underwent three days before the crash while renewing his pilot's license...that he passed with flying colors. So why wasn't the doctor who gave him a clean bill of health at the inquest or questioned by the police. In fact, Police Commissioner Stevens (2000-20006) stated to Paul's parents that Henri Paul was not drunk and that he was driving at a lower speed than indicated in the French proceedings.

Six weeks later, after Paul's parents testified at the inquest, Police Commissioner Stevens published a report that Paul was drunk. Henri Paul's residence was searched twice by the French Police. The first time, all that was found was an unopened bottle of champagne and a quarter bottle of a martini which hardly supports the claim that he was an alcoholic. So the police returned a few days later, and this time they found enough alcohol to stock an entire bar!

Here's another thing. The coroner at the inquest said Paul had no links to the security services. But Paul's bank accounts show that he received 349,800 French francs (34,980 pounds) during the final months of his life, mostly by checks. But the inquest never investigated who wrote those checks, nor investigated the transactions on his five credit cards, not to mention his mobile phone records.

That's not all. An autopsy was carried out by Dr. Dominique Lecomte, a doctor notorious in France for covering up medical evidence that would be embarrassing to the state. She committed 58 basic errors during the autopsy. Not only were her results inept, but "biologically inexplicable" as well. Every scientist involved in the inquest signed a joint statement stating that the blood test results for Henri Paul were "biologically inexplicable". There was a good chance that the blood samples were not even from Henri Paul.

But both doctors--Lecomte and Papal--did not attend the inquest even though as citizens of the European Union, they were legally obliged to. They were protected by the French government, who publicly sighted reasons of public order for their refusal, however the real reason was protection of state secrets in the essential interests of the nation.

In 2006, a team of scientists offered to do a DNA analysis of the blood samples to determine if they were in fact, from Henri Paul. The French government told them the samples no longer exist.

And what about the 3 hours and 41 minutes it took to get Princess Diana to the hospital? While Dodi Fayed and Henri Paul died instantly, and the bodyguard Trevor Reese was seriously injured, Diana was still conscious and alert. It was Dr Jean-Marc Martino, an emergency specialist who oversaw the Princess's treatment from shortly after the crash, who made a series of bizarre decisions that sealed her fate. It took an astonishing 37 minutes after the crash for Dr. Martino to remove the still conscious Diana from the Mercedes to the ambulance. The back of the car was undamaged, so there is no excuse for the delay. Then, it took an extraordinary 81 minutes for the ambulance to set off for the hospital, and another inexplicable 1 hour and 43 minutes for the ambulance to travel the three miles of empty roads to finally arrive at the hospital!

At the inquest, experts agreed that Diana's life could've been saved if not for the suspiciously slow and furtive actions of Dr. Martino and his crew.

But, why would anyone, let alone the powerful secret services of France, Britain and America want Diana dead? The secret services would never kill anyone, right? After all, Richard Dearlove, head of British Intelligence in 1997 calmly announced we have never killed anyone in the last 50 years. But Richard Tomlinson, a former MI6 agent gave testimony at the inquest by video link in France that contradicted that absurd statement. He couldn't come to Britain because if he had he would've been arrested. Tomlinson "outlined the execution of an assassination of a Serbian leader--Milosevic-- that involved arranging a car "accident" in a tunnel by flashing a very "bright flashing strobe gun to disorient Milosevec's chauffeur while the cavalcade passed into the tunnel. The advantage of a tunnel crash that there would be fewer incidental witnesses and greater chance of fatality." Sound familiar?

But, still, why would they want to kill Diana? Perhaps, it was her campaign to ban land mines. On January 15, 1997 Diana visited Angola to partake in the greatest photo opportunity the campaign had ever had, followed up in February 1997, by a photo op in Bosnia. Afterwards, she received a call from a British government defense minister who threatened her saying not to meddle in things she doesn't understand, and that accidents happen.

All of her calls were being monitored by British and American secret service. The Americans finally admitted to having over 1200 pages of transcripts in a National Security Council report, dated, January 5. 1999. Her campaign was clearly infuriating the armaments industry

Then, less than three weeks after the crash, the OSLO meeting in Norway, September 19, 1997 began. With Diana out of the way, most of the press didn't even bother attending. And Bill Clinton was the only western leader who voted AGAINST the ban on landmines, something he would've had a hard time doing if he had to look in Diana's eyes.

The only senior representative of the royal household to appear at the inquest was Sir Robert Fellowes, the Queen's private secretary. On Day 68 of the inquest, he stated that he was not at the palace before, during or after Diana's death because he was on vacation. Really?

In The Blair Years: The Alastair Campbell Diaries, Campbell writes of contact with Robert Fellowes from August 31 through September 5, 1997, proving Richard Fellowes was not on vacation and at the very center of Diana's funeral arrangements, overseeing her burial throughout the week.  Diana described Fellowes as one of the men that she fears. She said "he hates me and will do anything he can to get me out of the royals." Sir Robert Fellowes was made a lord in 1998 for his good work.

So why weren't the press more suspicious? Well, journalists have to answer to their editors who must answer to their proprietors, and in the UK, they all want knighthoods. The upshot is that most journalists are instinctively pro-establishment, therefore all to willing to believe the official story of Dianas's death even though it does not make any sense. It's difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding something.

In conclusion, there is no doubt that the entire inquest was skillfully manipulated by powerful unelected forces to the advantage of the royal family. This could only happen because Britain is, in essence, a monarchy, not a democracy. Much of Britain still operates on a system of unelected power, and its center are the Windsors, the old aristocracy and their vast wealth. Just as in medieval times British royalty live a life of unfettered privilege, the British taxpayers funding their lavish existence, officially 40 million pounds, unofficially, much, much more.

The letter Diana wrote to her butler predicting her death

Read more...

Woman Claims Her Daughter's Pic was Used as a Sandy Hook Victim

Ordinarily I would not post the following because there are some crazy people out there who might exploit even a tragic event like Sandy Hook for attention. However, considering all of the high weirdness that surrounds this tragedy, I wouldn't be surprised if this were true.

Woman claims daughter's picture is being posted as a Sandy Hook shooting victim.

Links:

Real Scoop on Sandy Hook Shooting

Read more...

Operation Mindfuck?

If there ever was a mindfuck--something that intentionally destabilizes, confuses or manipulates the mind of another person--this is it. Because nothing adds up, and maybe that's the point...I don't know. It involves a lawsuit (first press release supposedly April 23, 2012, but that link is no longer valid) alleged to involve the largest money laundering network in U.S. history, $43 trillion dollars taken from American taxpayers in banking schemes, a major news outlet, and murdered children.  Read on and see if you can make sense of this mindfuckery.

Not even one day after the mainstream news organization, CNBC published "Major Banks, Governmental Officials and Their Comrade Capitalists Targets of Spire Law Group, LLP's Racketeering and Money Laundering Lawsuit Seeking Return of $43 Trillion to the United States Treasury," CNBC executive Kevin Krim's two children were found murdered. viciously stabbed to death, supposedly, by the Krim family's 50-year old nanny Yoselyn Ortega, who was also found with what is being reported as "self-inflicted" stab wounds.  The mainstream story goes, she slit her own throat right after she stabbed the Krim children. 

Now, despite the mainstream reporting of the largest money laundering and racketeering lawsuit in US history, said to involve the most powerful people in the world, it could very well be a "frivolous law suit," that will fizzle out before it even gets started because the law firm, "Spire Law Group" may not be on the up and up. Perhaps this is an intentional effort to smear legitimate grievances against banks and their predatory lending practices. Who knows?  But then we have the murdered children of the  senior vice president of the mainstream news source occurring within hours of the press release.

Although, I certainly can't commit to a conspiracy here, as correlation does not necessarily indicate causality--granted the correlation here is very thin-- the inconsistencies and anomalies in this story alone, abound. Such as, why did the corporate-owned media automatically assume the nanny stabbed herself from the start? Suicide by slitting ones own throat is extremely rare, less than one percent of all suicides, primarily committed by men with military experience.  And as far as women are concerned, it's almost unheard of.

As for inconsistency, check out the conflicting reports from the NY Times:

10/25/12

"When Ms. Krim returned around 5:30 p.m., the commissioner said, she found a dark apartment. She went back down to the lobby to ask the doorman if he had seen the nanny and her children. When told that they had not left the building, she returned to the apartment. She looked around in the quiet rooms. Finally, she turned the lights on in the bathroom — and discovered her two children in the bathtub and the nanny unconscious on the floor.

10/26/12

"On Thursday evening around 5:30, Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly said, Marina Krim returned to her Upper West Side apartment with her 3-year-old daughter to discover her two other children, a 2-year-old boy and a 6-year-old girl, dead of knife wounds in the bathtub and Ms. Ortega slashing herself with the same bloodied kitchen knife used on the children.

Of course, police have released very little information other than they have no idea why the nanny did this as she was reported to be a "caring nanny."

"The superintendent of the building where Ortega lives said that the nanny is “a very nice woman” and “very religious,” continuing, “To me, she has always been very, very stable.”

Then, there's this: Three hours before these murders were reported, there were NYPD reports of a HOSTAGE SITUATION at the Krim's address involving at least two adults and three children.

NYCityAlerts @NYCityAlerts
Manhattan: *Hostage* 57 West 75 St Barricaded perp stabbed holding hostage 3 adults  2 kids, ESU enroute Level 1 mobilization called.NY03
2:42 PM - 25 Oct 12 ·

NYCityAlerts @NYCityAlerts
Manhattan: *Multiple Stabbing* 57 West 75 St. NYPD advising perp stabbed 4 victims   then stabbed himself, EMS requested on a rush. NY03
2:50 PM - 25 Oct 12 ·

NYCityAlerts @NYCityAlerts
Manhattan: *Multiple Stabbing* 57 West 75 St & Central Park West. EMS o/s advising 2 pediatrics in traumatic arrest. NY03
2:55 PM - 25 Oct 12 ·

Here is some more information about the lawsuit from the Wall Street: Journal (linked above):

"NEW YORK, Oct. 25, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Spire Law Group, LLP's national home owners' lawsuit, pending in the venue where the "Banksters" control their $43 trillion racketeering scheme (New York) - known as the largest money laundering and racketeering lawsuit in United States History and identifying $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money by the "Banksters" and their U.S. racketeering partners and joint venturers - now pinpoints the identities of the key racketeering partners of the "Banksters" located in the highest offices of government and acting for their own self-interests.

In connection with the federal lawsuit now impending in the United States District Court in Brooklyn, New York (Case No. 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML) - involving, among other things, a request that the District Court enjoin all mortgage foreclosures by the Banksters nationwide, unless and until the entire $43 trillion is repaid to a court-appointed receiver - Plaintiffs now establish the location of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money in a racketeering enterprise participated in by the following individuals (without limitation): Attorney General Holder acting in his individual capacity, Assistant Attorney General Tony West, the brother in law of Defendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris (both acting in their individual capacities), Jon Corzine (former New Jersey Governor), Robert Rubin (former Treasury Secretary and Bankster), Timothy Geitner, Treasury Secretary (acting in his individual capacity), Vikram Pandit (recently resigned and disgraced Chairman of the Board of Citigroup), Valerie Jarrett (a Senior White House Advisor), Anita Dunn (a former "communications director" for the Obama Administration), Robert Bauer (husband of Anita Dunn and Chief Legal Counsel for the Obama Re-election Campaign), as well as the "Banksters" themselves, and their affiliates and conduits. The lawsuit alleges serial violations of the United States Patriot Act, the Policy of Embargo Against Iran and Countries Hostile to the Foreign Policy of the United States, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly known as the RICO statute) and other State and Federal laws.

In the District Court lawsuit, Spire Law Group, LLP -- on behalf of home owner across the Country and New York taxpayers, as well as under other taxpayer recompense laws -- has expanded its mass tort action into federal court in Brooklyn, New York, seeking to halt all foreclosures nationwide pending the return of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000.00) by the "Banksters" and their co-conspirators, seeking an audit of the Fed and audits of all the "bailout programs" by an independent receiver such as Neil Barofsky, former Inspector General of the TARP program who has stated that none of the TARP money and other "bailout money" advanced from the Treasury has ever been repaid despite protestations to the contrary by the Defendants as well as similar protestations by President Obama and the Obama Administration both publicly on national television and more privately to the United States Congress. Because the Obama Administration has failed to pursue any of the "Banksters" criminally, and indeed is actively borrowing monies for Mr. Obama's campaign from these same "Banksters" to finance its political aspirations, the national group of plaintiff home owners has been forced to now expand its lawsuit to include racketeering, money laundering and intentional violations of the Iranian Nations Sanctions and Embargo Act by the national banks included among the "Bankster" Defendants.

The complaint - which has now been fully served on thousands of the "Banksters and their Co-Conspirators" - makes it irrefutable that the epicenter of this laundering and racketeering enterprise has been and continues to be Wall Street and continues to involve the very "Banksters" located there who have repeatedly asked in the past to be "bailed out" and to be "bailed out" in the future.

The Havens for the money laundering schemes - and certain of the names and places of these entities - are located in such venues as Switzerland, the Isle of Man, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Cypress and entities controlled by governments adverse to the interests of the United States Sanctions and Embargo Act against Iran, and are also identified in both the United Nations and the U.S. Senate's recent reports on international money laundering. Many of these entities have already been personally served with summons and process of the complaint during the last six months. It is now beyond dispute that, while the Obama Administration was publicly encouraging loan modifications for home owners by "Banksters", it was privately ratifying the formation of these shell companies in violation of the United States Patriot Act, and State and Federal law. The case further alleges that through these obscure foreign companies, Bank of America, J.P. Morgan, Wells Fargo Bank, Citibank, Citigroup, One West Bank, and numerous other federally chartered banks stole trillions of dollars of home owners' and taxpayers' money during the last decade and then laundered it through offshore companies.

This District Court Complaint - maintained by Spire Law Group, LLP -- is the only lawsuit in the world listing as Defendants the Banksters, let alone serving all of such Banksters with legal process and therefore forcing them to finally answer the charges in court. Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, nor the Office of the Attorney General, nor any State Attorney General has sued the Banksters and thereby legally chased them worldwide to recover-back the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) and other lawful damages, injunctive relief and other legal remedies.

James N. Fiedler, Managing Partner of Spire Law Group, LLP, stated: "It is hard for me to believe as a 47-year lawyer that our nation's guardians have been unwilling to stop this theft. Spire Law Group, LLP stands for the elimination of corruption and implementation of lawful strategies, and that is what we're doing here. Spire Law Group, LLP's charter is to not allow such corruption to go unanswered."

Comments were requested from the Attorney Generals' offices in NY, CA, NV, NH , OH, MA and the White House, but no comment was provided.

Links:

Derivatives: The $600 Trillion Time Bomb That's Set to Explode

Read more...

9/11 Conspiracy in Under 5 Minutes

Read more...

Collusion Found Between German Secret Service and Neo-Nazis.

Germany's secret service - Ver­fas­sungss­chutz (VS) - is at the center of a scandal involving a very well armed neo-Nazi terrorist cell operating in Germany since 2000. Last week, it was found that the Ver­fas­sungss­chutz destroyed files containing vital information on  the National Social­ist Underground (NSU), the day before it was supposed to be turned over to federal prosecutors.

The VS was built up after 1955 by Hubert Schrübbers, who had served the Nazi regime as a member of the SA storm troopers and as attorney general. According to Wikipedia, he filled a huge number of posts in the secret service with former members of the SS and its intelligence service, the SD.

 Heinz Fromm, head of the VS has resigned following an investigation initiated by the German judiciary on a series of unsolved murders dating from the period 2000-2010. During the investigations, the investigators have established a connection between the German Secret Service and the terrorist organization "clandestinity National Socialist" (NSU), a neo-Nazi terrorist cell accused of at least 10 murders.

The resignation of Fromm represent the latest chapter of an investigation started by magistrates last November. After careful analysis, the investigators concluded that the secret services were not only aware of the terrorist organization, but at the time of the opening of investigations have conveniently destroyed seven folders containing information provided by the militant neo-Nazi group, used as intelligence informants.

Fromm's resignation will not stop the work of the investigators intending to clarify the links between the NSU and intelligence agencies. Meanwhile, German politicians have spoken out in favor of the former intelligence chief, believed by the majority and the opposition "intact and unconnected with the facts on which the investigations are conducted."

This may be hard to believe, but according to a survey done by the Free University of Berlin, from a sample of 7,500 students over 15 years, 50% do not know who Adolf Hitler was, and, of those who do know, one-third believe he was a protector of human rights!

Operation Gladio was part of a post-World War II program set up by the CIA and NATO:

Read more...

The 2012 Transformation?

New Age gurus are everywhere, it seems. They galvanize people to their cult cause by mixing a wee bit of truth in with fables, legends, folk tales, and flat out disinformation, especially about 2012.

One such guru is Michael Tsarion, who has acquired quite a cult following. However, do not question his so-called historical/conspiracy research unless you want an "Irish handshake".

Read more...

Quattuordecillion in Secrert Sovereign Wealth Funds?

I was still trying to conceptualize $1 trillion when I came across the concept of $1 "quattuordecillion" - that's one, followed by 45 zeros:  $1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000! Enough money to buy a gold cube the size of the orbit of Saturn!  Now, I don't know about you, but I was never taught to count that high. In fact, to be honest, I never knew such a word existed; let alone, the idea of that much wealth.  So, one has to ask: who possesses this unbelievable accumulation of wealth?  If in fact, it exists. Well, who do you think? That infinitesimally small group of people who possess and control everything else: the global elite. Of course, they have done everything in their power to keep this a big secret, including a launching a disinformation campaign on the Internet that includes all the big players: Wikipedia, Google, etc.

The global GDP is reported to be $55 trillion annually, but you see governments maintain two sets of accounting books. One which is displayed to the public which contains official data issued by the government, and another secretive version which is used between sovereign entities. It is this secretive ledger that contains both the collateral accounts and Saint Germain's Foundation Divine and World Trust

Okay, for those of you who do not equate deep research with conspiracy fruitcakes, a little history:

In 1875 the wealth and assets of the royal families and nations held under colonial rule were centralized into one combined account to be used to the benefit of all nations. Then in 1921 the Royal Families and nations that owned the wealth in the Collateral Accounts agreed to establish the Trilateral Trillenium Tripartite Gold Commission to house and oversee these combined funds that contain deliverable precious metals and currencies worth upwards of one quattuordecillion dollars.  The  Combined International Collateral Accounts of the Global Debt Facility, contains within its ledger, the World Trust which is now worth $1 quatrodecillion dollars

From 1944/5 - 1994/5 The Trilateral Trillenium Tripartite Gold Commission (TTTGC) was organized and implemented, by the Nations of the World, with a Term period of 50 years. During this term period the Commission held the Mandate, Rights and Authorities over The Combined International Collateral Accounts of the Global Debt Facility. Following the expiry of the 50 year term, the Nations of the World, disappointed with the biased way The Combined International Collateral Accounts had been utilised within the 50 years, agreed not to extend the term of the TTTGC, but instead appointed a single independent person to the position of International Treasury Controller with full rights, authority, and legal ownership of the Combined International Collateral Accounts.

Extensions of this agreement were expanded through international treaties, some of which are still classified as top secret, including:

Jekyll Island Treaty (1910)
The London Treaty (1920)
The Second Plan of the Experts (1929)
The Hague Agreement (1930)
The Far East Combined Depositories Agreement (1932 1945)
The Bretton Woods Agreement (1944)
The B.I.S. / Allies Agreement (1948)
The Green Hilton Agreement (1963)
The Schweitzer Conventions (1968)
The Election / Appointment of Sole Arbiter Agreements (1995)
The Washington Panel (1998)
The Treaty for Respecting the Rights (2003)

These treaties were ratified by the sovereign nations of the world.. Proof of such is recorded in every nations charter of the U.N. The USA charter is based on the constitution and thus subject to constitutional law. Only Kings/Queens, Presidents, Prime Ministers, and in some cases Minsters of Finance or Foreign Affairs are granted access to these accounts. Verification is undertaken through a specific office under specific protocols dictated by the Head Office of the United Nations.

To curtail - or possibly, escalate illegal activities -  in 1995, the Trillenium Trilateral Tripartite Commission was stripped of its power and placed under the control of the International Treasury Controller and the Office of International Treasury Control, at the United Nations. Additionally, they now have jurisdiction over the IMF, World Bank, and the Bank of International Settlements which are all part of the Collateral Accounts. Despite this; the IMF, World Bank, and BIS continue to use the assets illegally for their own financing without giving any thought to the needs of the people of the world.

A controversial whistle blower has said that the US did not like that result and so the US, UK and France and their allies have continued to act as rogue nations attempting to keep stolen assets (and seeking to steal more) from the Collateral Accounts. These nations are, supposedly, covertly hindering the work of the OITC; hiding behind the secrecy provisions in the various treaties that established the OITC, as they seek to limit and even destroy the OITC's global wealth creation initiatives. He has also claimed that some of the assets were deposited at Ft. Hood, in an underground facility.

Who, in particular, is in charge of all this wealth? The Office of International Treasury Control?  Well, a man named Dr. Ray C. Dam is currently Chairman of this little known office.  Dam was appointed by the nations of the world as International Treasury Controller, Legal Decadency to Heir, Sole Arbiter, Owner and Controller of all Combined International Collateral Accounts of the Global Debt Facility, under International Legal Transfer Record RCD1088.   However, Dr. Ray C. Dam is a person, but His Excellency Dr. Ray C. Dam is a certified and indemnified international Central Banking financial institution operating as The Office of International Treasury Control.

The Assets of the Combined International Collateral Accounts are in constant use, assisting to finance countries and such organisations, either in part or full, as the International Monetary Fund, The World Bank, The International Finance Corporation, International Development Banks, United Nations, and additionally under-pinning the US Dollar as the World’s Reserve Currency.

George Freund posted the documents "purporting the sovereign wealth of those who claim to be sovereign".  And below you will find a letter that has been verified as being issued by Russell L. Munk, International Division, US Treasury, General Counsel, International Department, US Treasury, Washington D.C. 20220, USA, as of the date of the letter.
Now, for the important part. How do these funds reach you and me? Oh, I didn't tell you. These prosperity funds were created, in part, for the common man; although, we're at the bottom of the heap, because they must first travel down through 30.000 different trust funds beginning with the World Trust, at the highest level, under the world court.

• Level one: Saint Germain's Foundation Divine and World Trust
• Level two: 180 Royal Trusts. Examples include the French Trust, Russian Trust, Vatican Trust
• Level Three: Illuminati Family Trusts. Examples include Warburg Trust, Rothschilds Trust Rockefeller Trust
• Level Four: 250+ Corporate Trusts including GE, Lockheed, and at&t
• Level Five: Prosperity Program Trusts and 72 Bank Roll Programs managed by the IMF under the guidance of Saint Germain Bank roll programs include Bergavine, Omega and Freedom

The funds travel through each level they must be signed off by 4-5 trustees per trust

Starting at 38:40, the video below explains the collateral accounts

Ecclesiastes 6:2 A man to whom God hath given riches, wealth, and honour, so that he wanteth nothing for his soul of all that he desireth, yet God giveth him not power to eat thereof, but a stranger eateth it: this is vanity, and it is an evil disease.

Related Links:

Global Settlement Foundation: Finality of Settlement

Finality of Settlement Part II
Green Hilton Agreement 

Read more...